i love philippines t-shirt
i love philippines t-shirt
Butterball, a popular turkey company, is facing calls for a boycott ahead of the Thanksgiving holiday amid allegations of animal abuse that are circulating online . The claims about animal abuse stem from a video that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), an animal rights organization, shared on its X and Instagram accounts in November. That video accuses Butterball employees of abusing turkeys. “Do you know what happened to your Butterball turkey before they were killed?” the videos’ caption says. A VERIFY reader texted us to ask if Butterball turkeys have been recalled amid the abuse allegations. Google Trends data show other people online are also wondering if there’s a recall on Butterball turkeys. THE QUESTION Have Butterball turkeys been recalled amid abuse allegations? THE SOURCES The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Food and Drug Administration Butterball spokesperson People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) THE ANSWER No, Butterball turkeys have not been recalled amid abuse allegations. WHAT WE FOUND There isn’t a recall for Butterball turkeys, a spokesperson for the company and federal government websites confirm. The video circulating online alleging animal abuse is nearly 20 years old. If any food products were recalled, federal health officials would post notices on their websites. But that hasn’t happened as of Tuesday, Nov. 26. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) websites do not list any recent recalls for Butterball turkeys. A Butterball spokesperson also confirmed to VERIFY that none of the company’s products are recalled. The video accusing Butterball employees of abusing turkeys that sparked recall concerns is almost 20 years old, the company spokesperson said. "We are aware of a video from nearly 20 years ago, which is being re-shared across social media. This video is not current and was taken prior to Butterball becoming a private company and prior to our engagement and certification through American Humane,” the spokesperson told VERIFY. “Eleven years ago, Butterball was the first, and remains the only, turkey company to be American Humane certified. That means we have yearly audits conducted by a third party to ensure compliance with our 200+ science-based standards of best practice for care of turkeys, well exceeding industry best practices,” they added. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has a longer version of the video alleging turkey abuse posted on its website. That webpage links out to an article where PETA details an undercover investigation into a Butterball slaughterhouse in Ozark, Arkansas, that occurred nearly 20 years ago, from April to July 2006. During the undercover investigation, PETA investigators “documented that Butterball workers punched and stomped on live turkeys, slammed them against walls, and worse,” the animal rights organization said. In response to the old video recirculating online, the Butterball spokesperson added that the company has a “zero-tolerance policy for animal mistreatment."
, a global e-commerce powerhouse, has established itself as a leader in the online retail revolution. The company stands out as a prime investment opportunity, as the bull market continues to reward growth stocks. With its innovative platform, expanding global footprint, and strong financial growth, Shopify offers immense potential for long-term investors. Here are three compelling reasons to consider adding Shopify to your portfolio today. Shopify is synonymous with e-commerce innovation, providing entrepreneurs and businesses with a comprehensive platform to set up, manage, and grow their online stores. It has helped Shopify to become the digital backbone for more than 2.1 million businesses around the world. In addition, the strength of the company is its ability to change with the changing dynamics of the market and requirements of customers. Shopify is constantly evolving its platform, introducing new features like Shopify Markets, which makes cross-border selling much easier, and Shopify Plus for enterprise clients. This innovation helps Shopify maintain its position in an industry that will hit $7 trillion in global sales by 2025. The financial performance of Shopify underscores its resilience and growth potential. Despite macroeconomic challenges, the company has demonstrated consistent revenue growth, driven by higher merchant adoption and increased gross merchandise volume (GMV). Shopify’s Q3 2024 earnings showcased a robust 25% year-over-year increase in revenue, reflecting its expanding market share and merchant base. Furthermore, subscription-based revenue ensures a stable income flow, while its merchant solutions, including payment processing and logistics, add scalability. Shopify’s cost-efficiency measures have improved margins, making the company increasingly profitable, a key milestone for tech growth stocks. Moreover, Shopify’s ability to scale its operations is unmatched. Whether it is small businesses launching their first online stores or large enterprises like Heinz and Allbirds managing global operations, Shopify caters to a diverse audience. Shopify is not just dominating the North American market; it is strategically expanding into emerging markets with immense growth potential. Through initiatives like localized payment systems, regional language support, and international partnerships, Shopify is positioning itself as the go-to platform for global e-commerce. Key regions like Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa are witnessing exponential growth in online retail, fueled by increasing internet penetration and smartphone adoption. Shopify’s ability to cater to these markets through innovative solutions like mobile-first stores and integrated social commerce tools makes it a frontrunner in capturing this untapped potential. In addition, Shopify’s partnerships with major players like Google, Facebook, and TikTok amplify its reach, enabling merchants to connect with millions of potential customers globally. As these partnerships deepen and new ones emerge, Shopify’s ecosystem becomes even more indispensable for businesses looking to thrive in a connected world. Overall, Shopify is more than just a stock; it is a stake in the future of global commerce. With its leadership in the e-commerce space, strong financial growth, and strategic international expansion, Shopify is well-positioned to deliver significant returns in the coming years. Shopify represents a rare blend of innovation, scalability, and resilience for investors looking to ride the bull market wave. Its robust business model and unwavering focus on empowering merchants worldwide make it a must-buy stock on the TSX.
WASHINGTON (AP) — As a former and potentially future president, Donald Trump hailed what would become Project 2025 as a road map for “exactly what our movement will do” with another crack at the White House. As the blueprint for a hard-right turn in America became a liability during the 2024 campaign, Trump pulled an about-face . He denied knowing anything about the “ridiculous and abysmal” plans written in part by his first-term aides and allies. Now, after being elected the 47th president on Nov. 5, Trump is stocking his second administration with key players in the detailed effort he temporarily shunned. Most notably, Trump has tapped Russell Vought for an encore as director of the Office of Management and Budget; Tom Homan, his former immigration chief, as “border czar;” and immigration hardliner Stephen Miller as deputy chief of policy . Those moves have accelerated criticisms from Democrats who warn that Trump's election hands government reins to movement conservatives who spent years envisioning how to concentrate power in the West Wing and impose a starkly rightward shift across the U.S. government and society. Trump and his aides maintain that he won a mandate to overhaul Washington. But they maintain the specifics are his alone. “President Trump never had anything to do with Project 2025,” said Trump spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt in a statement. “All of President Trumps' Cabinet nominees and appointments are whole-heartedly committed to President Trump's agenda, not the agenda of outside groups.” Here is a look at what some of Trump's choices portend for his second presidency. The Office of Management and Budget director, a role Vought held under Trump previously and requires Senate confirmation, prepares a president's proposed budget and is generally responsible for implementing the administration's agenda across agencies. The job is influential but Vought made clear as author of a Project 2025 chapter on presidential authority that he wants the post to wield more direct power. “The Director must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the President’s mind,” Vought wrote. The OMB, he wrote, “is a President’s air-traffic control system” and should be “involved in all aspects of the White House policy process,” becoming “powerful enough to override implementing agencies’ bureaucracies.” Trump did not go into such details when naming Vought but implicitly endorsed aggressive action. Vought, the president-elect said, “knows exactly how to dismantle the Deep State” — Trump’s catch-all for federal bureaucracy — and would help “restore fiscal sanity.” In June, speaking on former Trump aide Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, Vought relished the potential tension: “We’re not going to save our country without a little confrontation.” The strategy of further concentrating federal authority in the presidency permeates Project 2025's and Trump's campaign proposals. Vought's vision is especially striking when paired with Trump's proposals to dramatically expand the president's control over federal workers and government purse strings — ideas intertwined with the president-elect tapping mega-billionaire Elon Musk and venture capitalist Vivek Ramaswamy to lead a “Department of Government Efficiency.” Trump in his first term sought to remake the federal civil service by reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers — who have job protection through changes in administration — as political appointees, making them easier to fire and replace with loyalists. Currently, only about 4,000 of the federal government's roughly 2 million workers are political appointees. President Joe Biden rescinded Trump's changes. Trump can now reinstate them. Meanwhile, Musk's and Ramaswamy's sweeping “efficiency” mandates from Trump could turn on an old, defunct constitutional theory that the president — not Congress — is the real gatekeeper of federal spending. In his “Agenda 47,” Trump endorsed so-called “impoundment,” which holds that when lawmakers pass appropriations bills, they simply set a spending ceiling, but not a floor. The president, the theory holds, can simply decide not to spend money on anything he deems unnecessary. Vought did not venture into impoundment in his Project 2025 chapter. But, he wrote, “The President should use every possible tool to propose and impose fiscal discipline on the federal government. Anything short of that would constitute abject failure.” Trump's choice immediately sparked backlash. “Russ Vought is a far-right ideologue who has tried to break the law to give President Trump unilateral authority he does not possess to override the spending decisions of Congress (and) who has and will again fight to give Trump the ability to summarily fire tens of thousands of civil servants,” said Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, a Democrat and outgoing Senate Appropriations chairwoman. Reps. Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico, leading Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, said Vought wants to “dismantle the expert federal workforce” to the detriment of Americans who depend on everything from veterans' health care to Social Security benefits. “Pain itself is the agenda,” they said. Trump’s protests about Project 2025 always glossed over overlaps in the two agendas . Both want to reimpose Trump-era immigration limits. Project 2025 includes a litany of detailed proposals for various U.S. immigration statutes, executive branch rules and agreements with other countries — reducing the number of refugees, work visa recipients and asylum seekers, for example. Miller is one of Trump's longest-serving advisers and architect of his immigration ideas, including his promise of the largest deportation force in U.S. history. As deputy policy chief, which is not subject to Senate confirmation, Miller would remain in Trump's West Wing inner circle. “America is for Americans and Americans only,” Miller said at Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally on Oct. 27. “America First Legal,” Miller’s organization founded as an ideological counter to the American Civil Liberties Union, was listed as an advisory group to Project 2025 until Miller asked that the name be removed because of negative attention. Homan, a Project 2025 named contributor, was an acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement director during Trump’s first presidency, playing a key role in what became known as Trump's “family separation policy.” Previewing Trump 2.0 earlier this year, Homan said: “No one’s off the table. If you’re here illegally, you better be looking over your shoulder.” John Ratcliffe, Trump's pick to lead the CIA , was previously one of Trump's directors of national intelligence. He is a Project 2025 contributor. The document's chapter on U.S. intelligence was written by Dustin Carmack, Ratcliffe's chief of staff in the first Trump administration. Reflecting Ratcliffe's and Trump's approach, Carmack declared the intelligence establishment too cautious. Ratcliffe, like the chapter attributed to Carmack, is hawkish toward China. Throughout the Project 2025 document, Beijing is framed as a U.S. adversary that cannot be trusted. Brendan Carr, the senior Republican on the Federal Communications Commission, wrote Project 2025's FCC chapter and is now Trump's pick to chair the panel. Carr wrote that the FCC chairman “is empowered with significant authority that is not shared” with other FCC members. He called for the FCC to address “threats to individual liberty posed by corporations that are abusing dominant positions in the market,” specifically “Big Tech and its attempts to drive diverse political viewpoints from the digital town square.” He called for more stringent transparency rules for social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube and “empower consumers to choose their own content filters and fact checkers, if any.” Carr and Ratcliffe would require Senate confirmation for their posts.UPDATE 1-On Christmas Eve, Pope Francis appeals for courage to better the world
As Trent Alexander-Arnold , Mohamed Salah , and Virgil van Dijk enter the final six months of their current contracts, clubs outside of the Premier League are watching with interest. While Liverpool will be keen to re-sign three of their most important players before their contracts expire on June 30, the decision could be out of their hands. As part of the groundbreaking 1995 Bosman ruling, clubs from other countries can discuss and finalise pre-contract agreements with players in England up to six months before the expiry of their current deals. Advertisement With so many high-profile players set to be out of contract in the summer, talk of pre-contract agreements will undoubtedly enter your radar in the coming weeks and days. To help you get your head around it all, The Athletic explains how it all works. What is a pre-contract agreement? A pre-contract arrangement is when a player agrees to join a different club at the expiry of their current contract. After the interested club provides written notice of their intent to do so, talks can begin up to six months before the expiry of a player’s current deal. According to the English FA’s regulations, breaches of this requirement can result in penalties. However, interested clubs often covertly contact a player’s intermediaries without express warning to the player’s current club to discuss a potential recruitment strategy well in advance of initiating formal pre-contract discussions. This six-month rule applies only to foreign clubs. For example, a Spanish club can enter pre-contract discussions with a Premier League player in January before a potential summer transfer, but other Premier League clubs cannot. When it comes to domestic free-agent transfers in England, a club cannot engage with a player playing for another club until they have entered the final month of their contract. Article 18.3 of FIFA ’s regulations for transfers states: “A club intending to conclude a contract with a professional must inform the player’s current club in writing before entering into negotiations with him. A professional shall only be free to conclude a contract with another club if his contract with his present club has expired or is due to expire within six months. Any breach of this provision shall be subject to appropriate sanctions.” In England, this rule applies exclusively when trying to sign players at clubs in other countries. But individual football associations are responsible for overseeing their own domestic transfers — and can therefore allow pre-contracts between clubs and players based in the same nation. How long have pre-contract agreements been around? Pre-contract agreements were part of the 1995 Bosman ruling on the freedom of movement of professional footballers. The rule is named after Jean-Marc Bosman, a Belgian footballer who wanted to transfer from RFC Liege in the Belgian first division to the French second-tier club Dunkerque after his contract in Belgium had expired. Advertisement Before the Bosman ruling took effect, players could not walk away from a club at the expiry of their contract. For a player to move on at the end of the deal, the interested clubs would either pay a fee to their current club or rely on that club allowing the player to walk away for free. In Bosman’s case, Liege demanded a transfer fee from Dunkerque after his contract expired in 1990, and the French club were unwilling to meet their valuation. When the deal fell through, Bosman had his wages cut by 75 per cent and was banned by the Belgian FA for not signing Liege’s contract proposal. Five years later, Bosman won a ruling against the Belgian FA, RFC Liege, and UEFA , citing the 1957 Treaty of Rome, which guaranteed the free movement of workers in the European Union. As part of the Bosman ruling, players with six months remaining of their current contract were permitted to begin negotiations with other clubs. What are the benefits? Like signing a player after their contract has expired, a club benefits by not having to pay a transfer fee. One of the most high-profile examples of a pre-contract agreement from the Premier League is Aaron Ramsey ’s transfer to Juventus in 2019. Before committing to the Italian club, Ramsey had reported discussions with Barcelona and Paris Saint-Germain , but he opted to join Juventus, who offered the Welshman a contract worth a reported £400,000 per week . Based on his basic salary, the deal made Ramsey the highest-earning British player in history. At the time, this arrangement was viewed as beneficial for the player and the club, with Juventus signing a top Premier League player without paying a transfer fee and Ramsey leveraging that situation to earn a large salary. The club also benefits from being able to secure a player’s future before the summer without interference from domestic clubs. Is this rare? While the Bosman rule is frequently used to sign players after their contracts expire, pre-contract agreements are relatively rare in English football. Southampton exercised its functions to sign Brazilian duo Welington and Juan, who are set to join the south coast club from Sao Paulo in January after agreeing terms in July 2024. Still, they remain one of the few clubs to have used the mechanism in the Premier League. In the men’s game, players leaving England for other leagues in this fashion does not happen often, but it’s becoming more frequent on the women’s side. In April 2024, Ellie Roebuck signed a pre-contract agreement to join Barcelona , leaving WSL side Manchester City after eight years. In a landscape where players are offered shorter contracts and players move upon the expiry of their deals more frequently compared to the Premier League, pre-contract agreements fit well in the women’s game. Advertisement However, in countries where the pre-contract agreement mechanism is not applied exclusively to foreign clubs, they are used much more routinely. Famously, Robert Lewandowski signed a pre-contract agreement to join Bayern Munich from Borussia Dortmund in January 2014, leaving one of Germany’s biggest clubs for another. How does it compare to Free Agency in the NBA and NFL ? American sports operate in an entirely different sporting sphere to European soccer, but there are some similarities. First, similar rules regarding ‘tampering’ exist in the Premier League, the NBA, and the NFL. Tampering rules prevent members of an organisation from engaging in discussions with a player to recruit them to their team. This includes formal discussions between executives and owners and players’ representatives, as well as informal player-to-player exchanges and coach-to-player dialogue. Regarding free agency — the period at the end of a player’s contract where they are free to pursue contract offers from other franchises — discussions are not permitted until the first day of the free agency period, which usually falls on the last day of June. However, like in the Premier League, it is an open secret in the NBA and NFL that breaches of the tampering rules occur frequently. It is very difficult for the league to police conversations between players and members of another franchise, and players’ representatives blur lines in all three leagues. Last summer, the NFL sanctioned the Atlanta Falcons for improper conduct in approaching quarterback Kirk Cousins — as well as wide receiver Darnell Mooney and tight end Charlie Woerner — before signing the 36-year-old to a four-year contract. For violating the anti-tampering policy, the Falcons forfeited their original fifth-round pick in the 2025 NFL Draft and paid a $250,000 fine. However, the salary cap in the NFL and NBA means a greater emphasis is placed on free agency than in the Premier League. There are set periods where trades (typically involving other players, future draft picks and minor cash considerations) can occur in those American leagues, but there is no transfer window where clubs recruit players from other clubs for significant fees. This means players move more frequently at the expiry of their contracts in the NBA and NFL than in the Premier League. Which Premier League players’ contracts expire this summer? Arsenal : Kieran Tierney , Thomas Partey , Jorginho Aston Villa : Robin Olsen , Kortney Hause Bournemouth : N/A Brentford : Ben Mee , Christian Norgaard *, Josh Dasilva * Brighton & Hove Albion: Tariq Lampety, Joel Veltman , Jakub Moder , James Milner Chelsea : N/A Crystal Palace : Remi Matthews , Nathaniel Clyne , Joel Ward , Will Hughes , Jeffrey Schlupp Advertisement Everton : Asmir Begovic , Joao Virginia *, Michael Keane , Mason Holgate , Ashley Young , Seamus Coleman , Abdoulaye Doucoure *, Idrissa Gueye , Dominic Calvert-Lewin Fulham : Kenny Tete , Tom Cairney , Adama Traore *, Raul Jimenez * Ipswich Town : Cameron Burgess , Luke Woolfenden , Massimo Luongo Leicester City : Danny Ward , Daniel Iversen , Jamie Vardy Liverpool: Virgil van Dijk, Trent Alexander-Arnold, Mohamed Salah Manchester City: Scott Carson , Ilkay Gundogan *, Kevin De Bruyne Manchester United : Tom Heaton , Victor Lindelof , Jonny Evans , Harry Maguire *, Amad* Newcastle United : Martin Dubravka , John Ruddy , Mark Gillespie , Fabian Schar , Jamaal Lascelles , Emil Krafth , Sean Longstaff *, Callum Wilson * Nottingham Forest : Harry Toffolo , Ola Aina , Chris Wood Southampton: Joe Lumley , Kyle Walker-Peters , Adam Lallana Tottenham Hotspur : Fraser Forster , Sergio Reguilon , Ben Davies *, Son Heung-min * West Ham United : Lukasz Fabianski *, Aaron Cresswell , Vladimir Coufal , Danny Ings , Michail Antonio Wolverhampton Wanderers : Craig Dawson , Nelson Semedo , Mario Lemina *, Pablo Sarabia * There are known clauses for clubs to trigger a one-year extension (Top photo: Paul Ellis/AFP via Getty Images)Taoiseach Simon Harris has insisted he is not aware that any member of his team tried to get RTE to take down a viral social media clip of a much-criticised encounter with a disability care worker. The Fine Gael leader was asked about the controversy in the first question posed during the second and final TV leaders’ debate of Ireland’s General Election campaign. Mr Harris apologised over the weekend for his handling of the discussion with Charlotte Fallon while canvassing in Kanturk in Co Cork on Friday evening. Tanaiste and Fianna Fail leader Micheal Martin, Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald and Taoiseach and Fine Gael leader Simon Harris with presenters Miriam O’Callaghan and Sarah McInerney during the final TV leaders’ debate at RTE studios in Donnybrook, Dublin (Niall Carson/PA) Mr Harris rang Ms Fallon on Saturday and said he unreservedly apologised for the way he treated her, however focus has since shifted to Fine Gael’s interactions with the national broadcaster about the social media video. At the outset of Tuesday’s TV debate, co-host Miriam O’Callaghan directly asked the Fine Gael leader whether a member of his party contacted RTE to ask for the clip to be taken down. “I have no knowledge of that whatsoever, because this clip was entirely appropriate,” said Mr Harris. “It was a very important moment on the campaign. “And RTE and indeed many media outlets have been with me throughout the campaign, covering many interactions that I’ve had with many, many people right across this country.” The Taoiseach said the approach by his team member was part of the “normal contact that happens between party politics and broadcasters on a daily basis”. Mr Harris’s partner-in-government in the last coalition, Fianna Fail leader Micheal Martin, said he was not aware of the approach to RTE by Fine Gael. Tanaiste and Fianna Fail leader Micheal Martin during the final TV leaders’ debate at RTE studios (Niall Carson/PA) “I think Simon has given his explanation to it. I’m not sure it’s as normal or as usual. I just get on with it every day. But, again, I think, you know, I’m not au fait with the details behind all of this, or the background to it. “The video didn’t come down, and it was seen by many, many people. “And I think it illustrates that out there, there are a lot of people suffering in our society. “Notwithstanding the progress we’ve made as a country, a lot of people are facing a lot of individual challenges, and our job as public representatives and as leaders in travelling the country is to listen to people, hear their cases, to understand the challenges that they are going through in their lives. “And when we go about in election campaigns, we have to open up ourselves to criticism and to people calling us to account.” Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald had earlier in the day described reports of the Fine Gael approach to RTE as “chilling”. Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald and Taoiseach and Fine Gael leader Simon Harris during the final TV leaders’ debate (Niall Carson/PA) Mr Harris previously branded the proposal a “dog whistle to conspiracy theorists” while Mr Martin said it was a “dangerous departure”. Ms McDonald defended the idea during the RTE Prime Time debate on Tuesday. “Politics and politicians should not try to influence editorial decisions or try and have clips taken down because they are inconvenient to them,” she said. “There has to be distance, there has to be objectivity. But I would say I am struck by the very defensive reaction from some to this (the review proposal). “The BBC, for example, a peer review looked at their coverage on migration. Politicians didn’t put their hands on it, and rightly so. “I think in a world where we have to rely on quality information, especially from the national broadcaster, which is in receipt of very substantial public funding, that has to be the gold standard of reliability. I think peer reviews like that are healthy.”
U.S. stock indexes drifted lower following some potentially discouraging data on the economy. The S&P 500 fell 0.5% Thursday, its third loss in the last four days. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.5%, and the Nasdaq composite dropped 0.7% from its record set the day before. A report earlier in the morning said more U.S. workers applied for unemployment benefits last week than forecast. A separate update showed that inflation at the wholesale level was hotter last month than economists expected. Adobe sank after issuing weaker-than-expected financial forecasts. Treasury yields rose in the bond market. On Thursday: The S&P 500 fell 32.94 points, or 0.5%, to 6,051.25. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 234.44 points, or 0.5%, to 43,914.12. The Nasdaq composite fell 132.05 points, or 0.7%, to 19,902.84. The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies fell 33.08 points, or 1.4%, to 2,361.08. For the week: The S&P 500 is down 39.02 points, or 0.6%. The Dow is down 728.40 points, or 1.6%. The Nasdaq is up 43.07 points, or 0.2%. The Russell 2000 is down 47.91 points, or 2%. For the year: The S&P 500 is up 1,281.42 points, or 26.9%. The Dow is up 6,224.58 points, or 16.5%. The Nasdaq is up 4,891.49 points, or 32.6%. The Russell 2000 is up 334.01 points, or 16.5%.
49ers at Packers, Week 12 predictions: Fans favoring Green Bay with Purdy sidelinedSavion Williams rushed for two touchdowns and Josh Hoover threw for 252 yards as TCU pulled away from Arizona in the second half, winning 49-28 on Saturday in Fort Worth, Texas. The Horned Frogs (7-4, 5-3 Big 12) scored touchdowns on five consecutive possessions, starting late in the first half after the Wildcats (4-7, 2-6) pulled within 14-13. Williams carried nine times for 80 yards, scoring on runs of 1 and 20 yards in the first half. Hoover completed 19 of 26 passes, with one touchdown and one interception, before being pulled midway through the fourth quarter when the Frogs were up by 21. TCU took control after leading 21-13 at halftime, going up 35-13 on a 38-yard reception to JP Richardson midway through the third. Arizona kept its hopes alive, ending a 15-play, 75-yard drive with a 3-yard touchdown pass to Chris Hunter on fourth down on the first play of the fourth quarter. The two-point conversion made it 35-21. But the Horned Frogs responded with another TD drive, capped by a 6-yard run by Cam Cook for a 42-21 advantage. Arizona added a 70-yard fumble return touchdown with one minute to go for the game's final score. Tetairoa McMillan caught nine passes for 115 yards to become the Arizona career leader in receiving yardage with 3,355. He surpassed his receivers coach, Bobby Wade (3,351), at the top spot. The Wildcats' Noah Fifita completed 29 of 44 passes for 284 yards with two touchdowns and an interception, which happened on the game's first snap. TCU promptly scored on a 4-yard run by Trent Battle, and Williams added a 1-yard TD run late in the first quarter for a 14-0 lead. But the Wildcats fought back, getting a 17-yard touchdown reception by Hunter and field goals of 53 and 43 yards from Tyler Loop to climb within 14-13 with 1:55 go before halftime. That's almost how the half ended, but the Horned Frogs converted third-and-18 on the ensuing drive and then gained 24 yards on third-and-25 to the Arizona 20. That set up a 20-yard run by Williams on fourth-and-1 with 13 seconds left for a 21-13 lead. --Field Level MediaBaburao Junior? Viral Instagram Reel of Little Boy’s Constant Attempt To Sing on the Mic at School Annual Function Reminds Netizens of Iconic ‘Hera Pheri’ Character, Watch Video
Trump taps Rollins as agriculture chief, completing proposed slate of Cabinet secretaries
White House mostly mum after Trump defeatIt takes more than rhetoric to shrink the state
Markets decline amid unabated foreign fund outflows, weak global trendsNone
KEYCORP DECLARES QUARTERLY CASH DIVIDEND ON COMMON SHARES AND PREFERRED STOCKSNYT Connections: Game #568 hints and answers for December 30, 2024: If you are struggling to come up with something to say for today's Connections, you might want to review these concepts and recommendations. NYT Connections: Game #568 hints and answers for December 30, 2024: Are you having issues with NYT Connexions right now? Don’t worry, here are some tips to help you get through it! For this exercise, you have to select four groups of sixteen words each, each with a different level of difficulty. The procedure is gradual and cautious. Every step you take makes it a bit more difficult. Here’s how to make it happen: You may thus begin with the easier stages and progress to the more difficult ones. The green, blue, and purple ones are the hardest, while the yellow one is one of the easiest. Although today’s job isn’t very challenging, it does call for focus and a thorough comprehension of social dynamics. Avoid making hasty decisions without giving them enough thought. I won’t go into too much depth, but the following tips should help you get started. Have fun and keep in mind that travelling to a new place for a holiday is quite fine. NYT Connections hints today If you think you can handle it, keep reading. Try using one of the following words to start each category: YELLOW – CLUB GREEN – BEANS BLUE – ANTE PURPLE – AIRPLANE NYT Connections Clues for December 30 (#568): Yellow Category: LUNCH ORDERS Green Category: USED TO MAKE COFFEE Blue Category: PAY, WITH “UP” Purple Category: NAMES FEATURING “!” NYT Connections Hints for December 30 (#568): YELLOW – Popular types of lunch orders. GREEN – Objects involved in crafting the perfect cup of coffee. BLUE – Verbs or terms often paired with “up” when discussing payments. PURPLE – Proper names or titles featuring an exclamation point. Don’t give up if you’ve tried everything; there’s always another method to find the answers. Examples of contemporary solutions that utilise the NYT Connexions include the following: NYT Connections Answers for December 30 (#568): Yellow Category: CLUB, HERO, MELT, WRAP Green Category: BEANS, FILTER, GRINDER, WATER Blue Category: ANTE, COUGH, PONY, SETTLE Purple Category: AIRPLANE!, JEOPARDY!, PINK!, YAHOO! Click for more latest Gaming news . Also get top headlines and latest news from India and around the world at News9. Pragya is an accomplished journalist known for in-depth reporting and a keen eye for detail. Delivers insightful and well-researched content that informs and engages readers. Latest News
i love philippines t-shirt
Butterball, a popular turkey company, is facing calls for a boycott ahead of the Thanksgiving holiday amid allegations of animal abuse that are circulating online . The claims about animal abuse stem from a video that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), an animal rights organization, shared on its X and Instagram accounts in November. That video accuses Butterball employees of abusing turkeys. “Do you know what happened to your Butterball turkey before they were killed?” the videos’ caption says. A VERIFY reader texted us to ask if Butterball turkeys have been recalled amid the abuse allegations. Google Trends data show other people online are also wondering if there’s a recall on Butterball turkeys. THE QUESTION Have Butterball turkeys been recalled amid abuse allegations? THE SOURCES The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Food and Drug Administration Butterball spokesperson People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) THE ANSWER No, Butterball turkeys have not been recalled amid abuse allegations. WHAT WE FOUND There isn’t a recall for Butterball turkeys, a spokesperson for the company and federal government websites confirm. The video circulating online alleging animal abuse is nearly 20 years old. If any food products were recalled, federal health officials would post notices on their websites. But that hasn’t happened as of Tuesday, Nov. 26. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) websites do not list any recent recalls for Butterball turkeys. A Butterball spokesperson also confirmed to VERIFY that none of the company’s products are recalled. The video accusing Butterball employees of abusing turkeys that sparked recall concerns is almost 20 years old, the company spokesperson said. "We are aware of a video from nearly 20 years ago, which is being re-shared across social media. This video is not current and was taken prior to Butterball becoming a private company and prior to our engagement and certification through American Humane,” the spokesperson told VERIFY. “Eleven years ago, Butterball was the first, and remains the only, turkey company to be American Humane certified. That means we have yearly audits conducted by a third party to ensure compliance with our 200+ science-based standards of best practice for care of turkeys, well exceeding industry best practices,” they added. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has a longer version of the video alleging turkey abuse posted on its website. That webpage links out to an article where PETA details an undercover investigation into a Butterball slaughterhouse in Ozark, Arkansas, that occurred nearly 20 years ago, from April to July 2006. During the undercover investigation, PETA investigators “documented that Butterball workers punched and stomped on live turkeys, slammed them against walls, and worse,” the animal rights organization said. In response to the old video recirculating online, the Butterball spokesperson added that the company has a “zero-tolerance policy for animal mistreatment."
, a global e-commerce powerhouse, has established itself as a leader in the online retail revolution. The company stands out as a prime investment opportunity, as the bull market continues to reward growth stocks. With its innovative platform, expanding global footprint, and strong financial growth, Shopify offers immense potential for long-term investors. Here are three compelling reasons to consider adding Shopify to your portfolio today. Shopify is synonymous with e-commerce innovation, providing entrepreneurs and businesses with a comprehensive platform to set up, manage, and grow their online stores. It has helped Shopify to become the digital backbone for more than 2.1 million businesses around the world. In addition, the strength of the company is its ability to change with the changing dynamics of the market and requirements of customers. Shopify is constantly evolving its platform, introducing new features like Shopify Markets, which makes cross-border selling much easier, and Shopify Plus for enterprise clients. This innovation helps Shopify maintain its position in an industry that will hit $7 trillion in global sales by 2025. The financial performance of Shopify underscores its resilience and growth potential. Despite macroeconomic challenges, the company has demonstrated consistent revenue growth, driven by higher merchant adoption and increased gross merchandise volume (GMV). Shopify’s Q3 2024 earnings showcased a robust 25% year-over-year increase in revenue, reflecting its expanding market share and merchant base. Furthermore, subscription-based revenue ensures a stable income flow, while its merchant solutions, including payment processing and logistics, add scalability. Shopify’s cost-efficiency measures have improved margins, making the company increasingly profitable, a key milestone for tech growth stocks. Moreover, Shopify’s ability to scale its operations is unmatched. Whether it is small businesses launching their first online stores or large enterprises like Heinz and Allbirds managing global operations, Shopify caters to a diverse audience. Shopify is not just dominating the North American market; it is strategically expanding into emerging markets with immense growth potential. Through initiatives like localized payment systems, regional language support, and international partnerships, Shopify is positioning itself as the go-to platform for global e-commerce. Key regions like Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa are witnessing exponential growth in online retail, fueled by increasing internet penetration and smartphone adoption. Shopify’s ability to cater to these markets through innovative solutions like mobile-first stores and integrated social commerce tools makes it a frontrunner in capturing this untapped potential. In addition, Shopify’s partnerships with major players like Google, Facebook, and TikTok amplify its reach, enabling merchants to connect with millions of potential customers globally. As these partnerships deepen and new ones emerge, Shopify’s ecosystem becomes even more indispensable for businesses looking to thrive in a connected world. Overall, Shopify is more than just a stock; it is a stake in the future of global commerce. With its leadership in the e-commerce space, strong financial growth, and strategic international expansion, Shopify is well-positioned to deliver significant returns in the coming years. Shopify represents a rare blend of innovation, scalability, and resilience for investors looking to ride the bull market wave. Its robust business model and unwavering focus on empowering merchants worldwide make it a must-buy stock on the TSX.
WASHINGTON (AP) — As a former and potentially future president, Donald Trump hailed what would become Project 2025 as a road map for “exactly what our movement will do” with another crack at the White House. As the blueprint for a hard-right turn in America became a liability during the 2024 campaign, Trump pulled an about-face . He denied knowing anything about the “ridiculous and abysmal” plans written in part by his first-term aides and allies. Now, after being elected the 47th president on Nov. 5, Trump is stocking his second administration with key players in the detailed effort he temporarily shunned. Most notably, Trump has tapped Russell Vought for an encore as director of the Office of Management and Budget; Tom Homan, his former immigration chief, as “border czar;” and immigration hardliner Stephen Miller as deputy chief of policy . Those moves have accelerated criticisms from Democrats who warn that Trump's election hands government reins to movement conservatives who spent years envisioning how to concentrate power in the West Wing and impose a starkly rightward shift across the U.S. government and society. Trump and his aides maintain that he won a mandate to overhaul Washington. But they maintain the specifics are his alone. “President Trump never had anything to do with Project 2025,” said Trump spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt in a statement. “All of President Trumps' Cabinet nominees and appointments are whole-heartedly committed to President Trump's agenda, not the agenda of outside groups.” Here is a look at what some of Trump's choices portend for his second presidency. The Office of Management and Budget director, a role Vought held under Trump previously and requires Senate confirmation, prepares a president's proposed budget and is generally responsible for implementing the administration's agenda across agencies. The job is influential but Vought made clear as author of a Project 2025 chapter on presidential authority that he wants the post to wield more direct power. “The Director must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the President’s mind,” Vought wrote. The OMB, he wrote, “is a President’s air-traffic control system” and should be “involved in all aspects of the White House policy process,” becoming “powerful enough to override implementing agencies’ bureaucracies.” Trump did not go into such details when naming Vought but implicitly endorsed aggressive action. Vought, the president-elect said, “knows exactly how to dismantle the Deep State” — Trump’s catch-all for federal bureaucracy — and would help “restore fiscal sanity.” In June, speaking on former Trump aide Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, Vought relished the potential tension: “We’re not going to save our country without a little confrontation.” The strategy of further concentrating federal authority in the presidency permeates Project 2025's and Trump's campaign proposals. Vought's vision is especially striking when paired with Trump's proposals to dramatically expand the president's control over federal workers and government purse strings — ideas intertwined with the president-elect tapping mega-billionaire Elon Musk and venture capitalist Vivek Ramaswamy to lead a “Department of Government Efficiency.” Trump in his first term sought to remake the federal civil service by reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers — who have job protection through changes in administration — as political appointees, making them easier to fire and replace with loyalists. Currently, only about 4,000 of the federal government's roughly 2 million workers are political appointees. President Joe Biden rescinded Trump's changes. Trump can now reinstate them. Meanwhile, Musk's and Ramaswamy's sweeping “efficiency” mandates from Trump could turn on an old, defunct constitutional theory that the president — not Congress — is the real gatekeeper of federal spending. In his “Agenda 47,” Trump endorsed so-called “impoundment,” which holds that when lawmakers pass appropriations bills, they simply set a spending ceiling, but not a floor. The president, the theory holds, can simply decide not to spend money on anything he deems unnecessary. Vought did not venture into impoundment in his Project 2025 chapter. But, he wrote, “The President should use every possible tool to propose and impose fiscal discipline on the federal government. Anything short of that would constitute abject failure.” Trump's choice immediately sparked backlash. “Russ Vought is a far-right ideologue who has tried to break the law to give President Trump unilateral authority he does not possess to override the spending decisions of Congress (and) who has and will again fight to give Trump the ability to summarily fire tens of thousands of civil servants,” said Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, a Democrat and outgoing Senate Appropriations chairwoman. Reps. Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico, leading Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, said Vought wants to “dismantle the expert federal workforce” to the detriment of Americans who depend on everything from veterans' health care to Social Security benefits. “Pain itself is the agenda,” they said. Trump’s protests about Project 2025 always glossed over overlaps in the two agendas . Both want to reimpose Trump-era immigration limits. Project 2025 includes a litany of detailed proposals for various U.S. immigration statutes, executive branch rules and agreements with other countries — reducing the number of refugees, work visa recipients and asylum seekers, for example. Miller is one of Trump's longest-serving advisers and architect of his immigration ideas, including his promise of the largest deportation force in U.S. history. As deputy policy chief, which is not subject to Senate confirmation, Miller would remain in Trump's West Wing inner circle. “America is for Americans and Americans only,” Miller said at Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally on Oct. 27. “America First Legal,” Miller’s organization founded as an ideological counter to the American Civil Liberties Union, was listed as an advisory group to Project 2025 until Miller asked that the name be removed because of negative attention. Homan, a Project 2025 named contributor, was an acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement director during Trump’s first presidency, playing a key role in what became known as Trump's “family separation policy.” Previewing Trump 2.0 earlier this year, Homan said: “No one’s off the table. If you’re here illegally, you better be looking over your shoulder.” John Ratcliffe, Trump's pick to lead the CIA , was previously one of Trump's directors of national intelligence. He is a Project 2025 contributor. The document's chapter on U.S. intelligence was written by Dustin Carmack, Ratcliffe's chief of staff in the first Trump administration. Reflecting Ratcliffe's and Trump's approach, Carmack declared the intelligence establishment too cautious. Ratcliffe, like the chapter attributed to Carmack, is hawkish toward China. Throughout the Project 2025 document, Beijing is framed as a U.S. adversary that cannot be trusted. Brendan Carr, the senior Republican on the Federal Communications Commission, wrote Project 2025's FCC chapter and is now Trump's pick to chair the panel. Carr wrote that the FCC chairman “is empowered with significant authority that is not shared” with other FCC members. He called for the FCC to address “threats to individual liberty posed by corporations that are abusing dominant positions in the market,” specifically “Big Tech and its attempts to drive diverse political viewpoints from the digital town square.” He called for more stringent transparency rules for social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube and “empower consumers to choose their own content filters and fact checkers, if any.” Carr and Ratcliffe would require Senate confirmation for their posts.UPDATE 1-On Christmas Eve, Pope Francis appeals for courage to better the world
As Trent Alexander-Arnold , Mohamed Salah , and Virgil van Dijk enter the final six months of their current contracts, clubs outside of the Premier League are watching with interest. While Liverpool will be keen to re-sign three of their most important players before their contracts expire on June 30, the decision could be out of their hands. As part of the groundbreaking 1995 Bosman ruling, clubs from other countries can discuss and finalise pre-contract agreements with players in England up to six months before the expiry of their current deals. Advertisement With so many high-profile players set to be out of contract in the summer, talk of pre-contract agreements will undoubtedly enter your radar in the coming weeks and days. To help you get your head around it all, The Athletic explains how it all works. What is a pre-contract agreement? A pre-contract arrangement is when a player agrees to join a different club at the expiry of their current contract. After the interested club provides written notice of their intent to do so, talks can begin up to six months before the expiry of a player’s current deal. According to the English FA’s regulations, breaches of this requirement can result in penalties. However, interested clubs often covertly contact a player’s intermediaries without express warning to the player’s current club to discuss a potential recruitment strategy well in advance of initiating formal pre-contract discussions. This six-month rule applies only to foreign clubs. For example, a Spanish club can enter pre-contract discussions with a Premier League player in January before a potential summer transfer, but other Premier League clubs cannot. When it comes to domestic free-agent transfers in England, a club cannot engage with a player playing for another club until they have entered the final month of their contract. Article 18.3 of FIFA ’s regulations for transfers states: “A club intending to conclude a contract with a professional must inform the player’s current club in writing before entering into negotiations with him. A professional shall only be free to conclude a contract with another club if his contract with his present club has expired or is due to expire within six months. Any breach of this provision shall be subject to appropriate sanctions.” In England, this rule applies exclusively when trying to sign players at clubs in other countries. But individual football associations are responsible for overseeing their own domestic transfers — and can therefore allow pre-contracts between clubs and players based in the same nation. How long have pre-contract agreements been around? Pre-contract agreements were part of the 1995 Bosman ruling on the freedom of movement of professional footballers. The rule is named after Jean-Marc Bosman, a Belgian footballer who wanted to transfer from RFC Liege in the Belgian first division to the French second-tier club Dunkerque after his contract in Belgium had expired. Advertisement Before the Bosman ruling took effect, players could not walk away from a club at the expiry of their contract. For a player to move on at the end of the deal, the interested clubs would either pay a fee to their current club or rely on that club allowing the player to walk away for free. In Bosman’s case, Liege demanded a transfer fee from Dunkerque after his contract expired in 1990, and the French club were unwilling to meet their valuation. When the deal fell through, Bosman had his wages cut by 75 per cent and was banned by the Belgian FA for not signing Liege’s contract proposal. Five years later, Bosman won a ruling against the Belgian FA, RFC Liege, and UEFA , citing the 1957 Treaty of Rome, which guaranteed the free movement of workers in the European Union. As part of the Bosman ruling, players with six months remaining of their current contract were permitted to begin negotiations with other clubs. What are the benefits? Like signing a player after their contract has expired, a club benefits by not having to pay a transfer fee. One of the most high-profile examples of a pre-contract agreement from the Premier League is Aaron Ramsey ’s transfer to Juventus in 2019. Before committing to the Italian club, Ramsey had reported discussions with Barcelona and Paris Saint-Germain , but he opted to join Juventus, who offered the Welshman a contract worth a reported £400,000 per week . Based on his basic salary, the deal made Ramsey the highest-earning British player in history. At the time, this arrangement was viewed as beneficial for the player and the club, with Juventus signing a top Premier League player without paying a transfer fee and Ramsey leveraging that situation to earn a large salary. The club also benefits from being able to secure a player’s future before the summer without interference from domestic clubs. Is this rare? While the Bosman rule is frequently used to sign players after their contracts expire, pre-contract agreements are relatively rare in English football. Southampton exercised its functions to sign Brazilian duo Welington and Juan, who are set to join the south coast club from Sao Paulo in January after agreeing terms in July 2024. Still, they remain one of the few clubs to have used the mechanism in the Premier League. In the men’s game, players leaving England for other leagues in this fashion does not happen often, but it’s becoming more frequent on the women’s side. In April 2024, Ellie Roebuck signed a pre-contract agreement to join Barcelona , leaving WSL side Manchester City after eight years. In a landscape where players are offered shorter contracts and players move upon the expiry of their deals more frequently compared to the Premier League, pre-contract agreements fit well in the women’s game. Advertisement However, in countries where the pre-contract agreement mechanism is not applied exclusively to foreign clubs, they are used much more routinely. Famously, Robert Lewandowski signed a pre-contract agreement to join Bayern Munich from Borussia Dortmund in January 2014, leaving one of Germany’s biggest clubs for another. How does it compare to Free Agency in the NBA and NFL ? American sports operate in an entirely different sporting sphere to European soccer, but there are some similarities. First, similar rules regarding ‘tampering’ exist in the Premier League, the NBA, and the NFL. Tampering rules prevent members of an organisation from engaging in discussions with a player to recruit them to their team. This includes formal discussions between executives and owners and players’ representatives, as well as informal player-to-player exchanges and coach-to-player dialogue. Regarding free agency — the period at the end of a player’s contract where they are free to pursue contract offers from other franchises — discussions are not permitted until the first day of the free agency period, which usually falls on the last day of June. However, like in the Premier League, it is an open secret in the NBA and NFL that breaches of the tampering rules occur frequently. It is very difficult for the league to police conversations between players and members of another franchise, and players’ representatives blur lines in all three leagues. Last summer, the NFL sanctioned the Atlanta Falcons for improper conduct in approaching quarterback Kirk Cousins — as well as wide receiver Darnell Mooney and tight end Charlie Woerner — before signing the 36-year-old to a four-year contract. For violating the anti-tampering policy, the Falcons forfeited their original fifth-round pick in the 2025 NFL Draft and paid a $250,000 fine. However, the salary cap in the NFL and NBA means a greater emphasis is placed on free agency than in the Premier League. There are set periods where trades (typically involving other players, future draft picks and minor cash considerations) can occur in those American leagues, but there is no transfer window where clubs recruit players from other clubs for significant fees. This means players move more frequently at the expiry of their contracts in the NBA and NFL than in the Premier League. Which Premier League players’ contracts expire this summer? Arsenal : Kieran Tierney , Thomas Partey , Jorginho Aston Villa : Robin Olsen , Kortney Hause Bournemouth : N/A Brentford : Ben Mee , Christian Norgaard *, Josh Dasilva * Brighton & Hove Albion: Tariq Lampety, Joel Veltman , Jakub Moder , James Milner Chelsea : N/A Crystal Palace : Remi Matthews , Nathaniel Clyne , Joel Ward , Will Hughes , Jeffrey Schlupp Advertisement Everton : Asmir Begovic , Joao Virginia *, Michael Keane , Mason Holgate , Ashley Young , Seamus Coleman , Abdoulaye Doucoure *, Idrissa Gueye , Dominic Calvert-Lewin Fulham : Kenny Tete , Tom Cairney , Adama Traore *, Raul Jimenez * Ipswich Town : Cameron Burgess , Luke Woolfenden , Massimo Luongo Leicester City : Danny Ward , Daniel Iversen , Jamie Vardy Liverpool: Virgil van Dijk, Trent Alexander-Arnold, Mohamed Salah Manchester City: Scott Carson , Ilkay Gundogan *, Kevin De Bruyne Manchester United : Tom Heaton , Victor Lindelof , Jonny Evans , Harry Maguire *, Amad* Newcastle United : Martin Dubravka , John Ruddy , Mark Gillespie , Fabian Schar , Jamaal Lascelles , Emil Krafth , Sean Longstaff *, Callum Wilson * Nottingham Forest : Harry Toffolo , Ola Aina , Chris Wood Southampton: Joe Lumley , Kyle Walker-Peters , Adam Lallana Tottenham Hotspur : Fraser Forster , Sergio Reguilon , Ben Davies *, Son Heung-min * West Ham United : Lukasz Fabianski *, Aaron Cresswell , Vladimir Coufal , Danny Ings , Michail Antonio Wolverhampton Wanderers : Craig Dawson , Nelson Semedo , Mario Lemina *, Pablo Sarabia * There are known clauses for clubs to trigger a one-year extension (Top photo: Paul Ellis/AFP via Getty Images)Taoiseach Simon Harris has insisted he is not aware that any member of his team tried to get RTE to take down a viral social media clip of a much-criticised encounter with a disability care worker. The Fine Gael leader was asked about the controversy in the first question posed during the second and final TV leaders’ debate of Ireland’s General Election campaign. Mr Harris apologised over the weekend for his handling of the discussion with Charlotte Fallon while canvassing in Kanturk in Co Cork on Friday evening. Tanaiste and Fianna Fail leader Micheal Martin, Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald and Taoiseach and Fine Gael leader Simon Harris with presenters Miriam O’Callaghan and Sarah McInerney during the final TV leaders’ debate at RTE studios in Donnybrook, Dublin (Niall Carson/PA) Mr Harris rang Ms Fallon on Saturday and said he unreservedly apologised for the way he treated her, however focus has since shifted to Fine Gael’s interactions with the national broadcaster about the social media video. At the outset of Tuesday’s TV debate, co-host Miriam O’Callaghan directly asked the Fine Gael leader whether a member of his party contacted RTE to ask for the clip to be taken down. “I have no knowledge of that whatsoever, because this clip was entirely appropriate,” said Mr Harris. “It was a very important moment on the campaign. “And RTE and indeed many media outlets have been with me throughout the campaign, covering many interactions that I’ve had with many, many people right across this country.” The Taoiseach said the approach by his team member was part of the “normal contact that happens between party politics and broadcasters on a daily basis”. Mr Harris’s partner-in-government in the last coalition, Fianna Fail leader Micheal Martin, said he was not aware of the approach to RTE by Fine Gael. Tanaiste and Fianna Fail leader Micheal Martin during the final TV leaders’ debate at RTE studios (Niall Carson/PA) “I think Simon has given his explanation to it. I’m not sure it’s as normal or as usual. I just get on with it every day. But, again, I think, you know, I’m not au fait with the details behind all of this, or the background to it. “The video didn’t come down, and it was seen by many, many people. “And I think it illustrates that out there, there are a lot of people suffering in our society. “Notwithstanding the progress we’ve made as a country, a lot of people are facing a lot of individual challenges, and our job as public representatives and as leaders in travelling the country is to listen to people, hear their cases, to understand the challenges that they are going through in their lives. “And when we go about in election campaigns, we have to open up ourselves to criticism and to people calling us to account.” Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald had earlier in the day described reports of the Fine Gael approach to RTE as “chilling”. Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald and Taoiseach and Fine Gael leader Simon Harris during the final TV leaders’ debate (Niall Carson/PA) Mr Harris previously branded the proposal a “dog whistle to conspiracy theorists” while Mr Martin said it was a “dangerous departure”. Ms McDonald defended the idea during the RTE Prime Time debate on Tuesday. “Politics and politicians should not try to influence editorial decisions or try and have clips taken down because they are inconvenient to them,” she said. “There has to be distance, there has to be objectivity. But I would say I am struck by the very defensive reaction from some to this (the review proposal). “The BBC, for example, a peer review looked at their coverage on migration. Politicians didn’t put their hands on it, and rightly so. “I think in a world where we have to rely on quality information, especially from the national broadcaster, which is in receipt of very substantial public funding, that has to be the gold standard of reliability. I think peer reviews like that are healthy.”
U.S. stock indexes drifted lower following some potentially discouraging data on the economy. The S&P 500 fell 0.5% Thursday, its third loss in the last four days. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.5%, and the Nasdaq composite dropped 0.7% from its record set the day before. A report earlier in the morning said more U.S. workers applied for unemployment benefits last week than forecast. A separate update showed that inflation at the wholesale level was hotter last month than economists expected. Adobe sank after issuing weaker-than-expected financial forecasts. Treasury yields rose in the bond market. On Thursday: The S&P 500 fell 32.94 points, or 0.5%, to 6,051.25. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 234.44 points, or 0.5%, to 43,914.12. The Nasdaq composite fell 132.05 points, or 0.7%, to 19,902.84. The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies fell 33.08 points, or 1.4%, to 2,361.08. For the week: The S&P 500 is down 39.02 points, or 0.6%. The Dow is down 728.40 points, or 1.6%. The Nasdaq is up 43.07 points, or 0.2%. The Russell 2000 is down 47.91 points, or 2%. For the year: The S&P 500 is up 1,281.42 points, or 26.9%. The Dow is up 6,224.58 points, or 16.5%. The Nasdaq is up 4,891.49 points, or 32.6%. The Russell 2000 is up 334.01 points, or 16.5%.
49ers at Packers, Week 12 predictions: Fans favoring Green Bay with Purdy sidelinedSavion Williams rushed for two touchdowns and Josh Hoover threw for 252 yards as TCU pulled away from Arizona in the second half, winning 49-28 on Saturday in Fort Worth, Texas. The Horned Frogs (7-4, 5-3 Big 12) scored touchdowns on five consecutive possessions, starting late in the first half after the Wildcats (4-7, 2-6) pulled within 14-13. Williams carried nine times for 80 yards, scoring on runs of 1 and 20 yards in the first half. Hoover completed 19 of 26 passes, with one touchdown and one interception, before being pulled midway through the fourth quarter when the Frogs were up by 21. TCU took control after leading 21-13 at halftime, going up 35-13 on a 38-yard reception to JP Richardson midway through the third. Arizona kept its hopes alive, ending a 15-play, 75-yard drive with a 3-yard touchdown pass to Chris Hunter on fourth down on the first play of the fourth quarter. The two-point conversion made it 35-21. But the Horned Frogs responded with another TD drive, capped by a 6-yard run by Cam Cook for a 42-21 advantage. Arizona added a 70-yard fumble return touchdown with one minute to go for the game's final score. Tetairoa McMillan caught nine passes for 115 yards to become the Arizona career leader in receiving yardage with 3,355. He surpassed his receivers coach, Bobby Wade (3,351), at the top spot. The Wildcats' Noah Fifita completed 29 of 44 passes for 284 yards with two touchdowns and an interception, which happened on the game's first snap. TCU promptly scored on a 4-yard run by Trent Battle, and Williams added a 1-yard TD run late in the first quarter for a 14-0 lead. But the Wildcats fought back, getting a 17-yard touchdown reception by Hunter and field goals of 53 and 43 yards from Tyler Loop to climb within 14-13 with 1:55 go before halftime. That's almost how the half ended, but the Horned Frogs converted third-and-18 on the ensuing drive and then gained 24 yards on third-and-25 to the Arizona 20. That set up a 20-yard run by Williams on fourth-and-1 with 13 seconds left for a 21-13 lead. --Field Level MediaBaburao Junior? Viral Instagram Reel of Little Boy’s Constant Attempt To Sing on the Mic at School Annual Function Reminds Netizens of Iconic ‘Hera Pheri’ Character, Watch Video
Trump taps Rollins as agriculture chief, completing proposed slate of Cabinet secretaries
White House mostly mum after Trump defeatIt takes more than rhetoric to shrink the state
Markets decline amid unabated foreign fund outflows, weak global trendsNone
KEYCORP DECLARES QUARTERLY CASH DIVIDEND ON COMMON SHARES AND PREFERRED STOCKSNYT Connections: Game #568 hints and answers for December 30, 2024: If you are struggling to come up with something to say for today's Connections, you might want to review these concepts and recommendations. NYT Connections: Game #568 hints and answers for December 30, 2024: Are you having issues with NYT Connexions right now? Don’t worry, here are some tips to help you get through it! For this exercise, you have to select four groups of sixteen words each, each with a different level of difficulty. The procedure is gradual and cautious. Every step you take makes it a bit more difficult. Here’s how to make it happen: You may thus begin with the easier stages and progress to the more difficult ones. The green, blue, and purple ones are the hardest, while the yellow one is one of the easiest. Although today’s job isn’t very challenging, it does call for focus and a thorough comprehension of social dynamics. Avoid making hasty decisions without giving them enough thought. I won’t go into too much depth, but the following tips should help you get started. Have fun and keep in mind that travelling to a new place for a holiday is quite fine. NYT Connections hints today If you think you can handle it, keep reading. Try using one of the following words to start each category: YELLOW – CLUB GREEN – BEANS BLUE – ANTE PURPLE – AIRPLANE NYT Connections Clues for December 30 (#568): Yellow Category: LUNCH ORDERS Green Category: USED TO MAKE COFFEE Blue Category: PAY, WITH “UP” Purple Category: NAMES FEATURING “!” NYT Connections Hints for December 30 (#568): YELLOW – Popular types of lunch orders. GREEN – Objects involved in crafting the perfect cup of coffee. BLUE – Verbs or terms often paired with “up” when discussing payments. PURPLE – Proper names or titles featuring an exclamation point. Don’t give up if you’ve tried everything; there’s always another method to find the answers. Examples of contemporary solutions that utilise the NYT Connexions include the following: NYT Connections Answers for December 30 (#568): Yellow Category: CLUB, HERO, MELT, WRAP Green Category: BEANS, FILTER, GRINDER, WATER Blue Category: ANTE, COUGH, PONY, SETTLE Purple Category: AIRPLANE!, JEOPARDY!, PINK!, YAHOO! Click for more latest Gaming news . Also get top headlines and latest news from India and around the world at News9. Pragya is an accomplished journalist known for in-depth reporting and a keen eye for detail. Delivers insightful and well-researched content that informs and engages readers. Latest News
-
"> -
">
-
">
-
">
