jili slot game jiliasia

By EMILY WAGSTER PETTUS JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court should overturn Mississippi’s Jim Crow-era practice of removing voting rights from people convicted of certain felonies, including nonviolent crimes such as forgery and timber theft, attorneys say in new court papers. Most of the people affected are disenfranchised for life because the state provides few options for restoring ballot access. “Mississippi’s harsh and unforgiving felony disenfranchisement scheme is a national outlier,” attorneys representing some who lost voting rights said in an appeal filed Wednesday. They wrote that states “have consistently moved away from lifetime felony disenfranchisement over the past few decades.” This case is the second in recent years — and the third since the late 19th century — that asks the Supreme Court to overturn Mississippi’s disenfranchisement for some felonies. The cases use different legal arguments, and the court rejected the most recent attempt in 2023. The new appeal asks justices to reverse a July ruling from the conservative 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which said Mississippi legislators, not the courts, must decide whether to change the laws. Stripping away voting rights for some crimes is unconstitutional because it is cruel and unusual punishment, the appeal argues. A majority of justices rejected arguments over cruel and unusual punishment in June when they cleared the way for cities to enforce bans on homeless people sleeping outside in public places. Attorneys who sued Mississippi over voting rights say the authors of the state’s 1890 constitution based disenfranchisement on a list of crimes they thought Black people were more likely to commit. A majority of the appeals judges wrote that the Supreme Court in 1974 reaffirmed constitutional law allowing states to disenfranchise felons. About 38% of Mississippi residents are Black. Nearly 50,000 people were disenfranchised under the state’s felony voting ban between 1994 and 2017. More than 29,000 of them have completed their sentences, and about 58% of that group are Black, according to an expert who analyzed data for plaintiffs challenging the voting ban. Related Articles National Politics | Trump convinced Republicans to overlook his misconduct. But can he do the same for his nominees? National Politics | Beyond evangelicals, Trump and his allies courted smaller faith groups, from the Amish to Chabad National Politics | Trump gave Interior nominee one directive for a half-billion acres of US land: ‘Drill.’ National Politics | Trump’s team is delaying transition agreements. What does it mean for security checks and governing? National Politics | Judge delays Trump hush money sentencing in order to decide where case should go now To regain voting rights in Mississippi, a person convicted of a disenfranchising crime must receive a governor’s pardon or win permission from two-thirds of the state House and Senate. In recent years, legislators have restored voting rights for only a few people. The other recent case that went to the Supreme Court argued that authors of Mississippi’s constitution showed racist intent when they chose which felonies would cause people to lose the right to vote. In that ruling, justices declined to reconsider a 2022 appeals court decision that said Mississippi remedied the discriminatory intent of the original provisions in the state constitution by later altering the list of disenfranchising crimes. In 1950, Mississippi dropped burglary from the list. Murder and rape were added in 1968. The Mississippi attorney general issued an opinion in 2009 that expanded the list to 22 crimes, including timber larceny, carjacking, felony-level shoplifting and felony-level writing bad checks. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in a 2023 dissent that Mississippi’s list of disenfranchising crimes was “adopted for an illicit discriminatory purpose.”

Prosecutors play undercover recordings of Madigan at former speaker’s corruption trialRequiem for a Dream

Players have mixed feelings about being on the road on Christmas as NFL adds more holiday gamesTwo content creators are taking a battle for an online vibe to court. This past April, filed a lawsuit against alleging she "replicated" her "neutral, beige, and cream aesthetic" across various social media platforms. The lawsuit has been dubbed a first-of-its-kind case about content similarities between influencers, both of whom are fighting to prove that the photos and videos uploaded to their respective accounts online are uniquely their own. Per the April filing, obtained by PEOPLE, Gifford brought eight claims against the defendant. Among them include federal copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement, Digital Millennium Copyright Act violation, trade dress infringement and misappropriation. Gifford has been curating her "brand identity" and "credibility" online over the past five years, per the filing, becoming known for her promotion of Amazon products like apparel and household goods. She has "grown her business into a multi-thousand dollar operation," her lawsuit states. Related: While the influencers maintain a presence online, they met in person in December 2022 with the intent to support each other's businesses. They got together again in January the following year, which resulted in Gifford blocking Sheil from viewing her content a few days later, per the filing. On Monday, Aug. 5, four months after Gifford sued in April, attorneys for Sheil asked the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas to dismiss claims brought forth against the defendant. Per the court documents, Sheil denied "every allegation" in the complaint. "Sheil has never infringed on any work of Gifford’s, because Sheil’s work is independently developed, does not use anything belonging to Gifford, and is not based on anything posted by Gifford," the court document reads. In November 2024, the Gifford's original complaint against Sheil should move forward. Judge Robert Pitman of the US District Court for the Western District of Texas will be in charge of the final disposition, reports. Read on to learn more about the first-of-its-kind lawsuit about influencer aesthetics online. Sydney Nicole Gifford/Instagram Sydney Nicole Gifford is a 24-year-old social media influencer who's amassed nearly half a million followers across Instagram, TikTok and Amazon Storefront. She is from Austin, Texas, though lives in Minneapolis now, according to her Instagram bio. The content Gifford creates centers around her home, fashion and "must-have" items she finds on Amazon. She stands out because of her neutral-toned vibe, curating her content with shades of brown and tan hues. "I think I feel more calm in neutral spaces,” Gifford told in late November. “Now my favorite color is beige," she added, which explains the hashtag she'll occasionally use on her content (#sadbeigehome). "It is a sad beige home, and I like it." The influencer spends several hours every day of the week capturing and creating content to share with her followers online, all aligning with her neutral aesthetic. She often promotes brand products and services through her photos and videos. Related: Alyssa Sheil/Instagram Alyssa Sheil is a 21-year-old content creator who shares fashion and lifestyle content with her nearly half a million followers across Instagram and TikTok combined. She is from Williamson County, Texas. Like Gifford, Sheil curates her content to align with a beige aesthetic. All of her posts — like outfit of the day posts, home decor finds and beauty-related photos — are neutral-toned. "It’s definitely very calming,” Sheil said of her decor when speaking with , who visited the Texas-based influencer for an interview a few days prior to meeting up with Gifford in her Minneapolis home. "I just want it to all be cohesive and plain." Sydney Nicole Gifford/Instagram Gifford is suing Sheil for allegedly mimicking the vibe of her social media content — including fonts and camera angles, apartment decor, similar Amazon products and even physical appearance — and replicating it on her own page. Per the original filing in April, obtained by PEOPLE, Gifford brought eight claims: federal copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement, Digital Millennium Copyright Act violation, trade dress infringement, misappropriation, tortious interference with prospective business relations, unfair trade practices and unfair competition and unjust enrichment. Although they exist separately online, the two creators have a brief history together having both lived in Austin at one point. Per the filing, the replication of content began after they met up for a second time in January 2023 to discuss a potential collaboration. At the time, they conducted a photoshoot that would be promoted on their respective accounts. "A few days later, Alyssa blocked Sydney from viewing her content on Instagram and TikTok," the original filing reads, alleging that the defendant's "platforms changed ostensibly." The filing claims that Sheil began to post content that "replicated the neutral, beige and cream aesthetic" of Gifford's "brand identity," featured "the same or substantially Amazon products" she promoted and "contained styling and textual captions" that replicated hers. Related: Alyssa Sheil/Instagram Sheil's attorney responded to Gifford's lawsuit on Aug. 5, denying "every allegation in the complaint." According to the court document, the case "stems" from "jealousy." When the creators first met, per the filing, Sheil was "younger and more successful on certain social media platforms that Gifford had not yet maximized." The documents allege that "it was Gifford who asked Sheil" content-related questions. Still, Sheil didn't file "a meritless lawsuit" claiming that Gifford "stole her likeness," explaining that it's "the very nature" of the fashion and influencer industries. "Similar influencer content creators collaborate, adopt, and evolve on trends and looks to promote products to their audience and followers." When Sheil spoke with , she was confident about where she stands as a creator despite navigating lawyers and lawsuits. "I do think that there’s space and definitely enough money for everyone that’s in [the Amazon influencer] program,” she told the outlet. Many are invested in the first-of-its-kind case questioning if the legal system could essentially protect the vibe of a content creator's vibe online as the two influencers await trial. Per Gifford's Texas lawsuit, Sheil is being sued for damages that could reach into the millions. Read the original article on

A voting machine firm suing Fox News now wants to probe Murdoch family trust fightTravis Kelce, Jason Kelce Reveal Christmas Message They Received From Their Mother

Greenwave technology CEO Danny Meeks buys $248,821 in stockUpstart Holdings director Cooper sells $37,295 in stockI Regret To Inform You The Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare LED Mask Is Worth Every Penny

Zuora Reports Third Quarter Fiscal 2025 Results

Percentages: FG 43.478, FT .667. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

Attorneys want the US Supreme Court to say Mississippi’s felony voting ban is cruel and unusualLincoln man gets 20 years for distributing fentanyl that led to woman's overdose

Marietta Collaborative Divorce Lawyer Tori White Releases Insightful Article on Collaborative Divorce 12-04-2024 10:16 PM CET | Politics, Law & Society Press release from: ABNewswire Marietta collaborative divorce lawyer Tori White ( https://www.toriwhitelegal.com/marietta-collaborative-divorce-lawyer/ ), of the Tori White Legal Group, sheds light on an alternative divorce process designed to reduce conflict, protect privacy, and promote cooperation. Collaborative divorce, a modern approach to marital dissolution, emphasizes mutual respect and problem-solving rather than adversarial courtroom battles. This method can be an empowering option for families seeking a dignified resolution to marital conflicts. Tori White, a seasoned Marietta collaborative divorce lawyer, describes this process as a transformative way to address family challenges. Collaborative divorce encourages open communication and prioritizes the well-being of all parties involved, especially children. "The collaborative process allows couples to take control of their divorce by working together to find solutions that meet their unique needs," says White. This structured and cooperative approach offers an appealing alternative to traditional litigation, which can be costly and emotionally draining. In the collaborative divorce process, both spouses commit to resolving their differences without going to court. They work alongside their respective attorneys to negotiate terms in a series of private meetings. With a focus on transparency and fairness, this approach facilitates agreements on issues such as child custody, property division, and financial arrangements. The Marietta collaborative divorce lawyer can guide families through each step of this process, helping ensure that all legal requirements are met while maintaining a constructive dialogue. Collaborative divorce offers distinct advantages over traditional divorce methods, making it a preferred choice for many families in Marietta. At its core, the process is designed to minimize conflict and foster a cooperative environment. Couples engage in voluntary, confidential discussions where they can express their priorities and concerns. Unlike courtroom proceedings, which can be public and adversarial, collaborative divorce keeps negotiations private and focused on achieving mutually beneficial outcomes. Tori White highlights how this process addresses financial concerns effectively. "Reducing litigation and encouraging cooperative decision-making through collaborative divorce often saves couples both time and money," Tori White explains. The streamlined process helps spouses avoid the drawn-out disputes and high costs associated with court battles, providing them with greater control over the final agreement. A key feature of collaborative divorce is its focus on building a foundation for the future. This method is especially beneficial for families with children, as it emphasizes creating child-centered parenting plans and custody arrangements. Parents work together to develop agreements that prioritize their children's emotional and developmental needs, fostering stability and security during a challenging time. White underscores the importance of this collaborative focus, stating, "When parents approach divorce with a mindset of cooperation, they set a powerful example for their children and pave the way for a healthier post-divorce dynamic." Addressing both immediate and long-term concerns through the collaborative process helps families transition more smoothly into their new realities. While collaborative divorce offers significant benefits, it does require both parties to commit fully to the process. If either spouse is unwilling to engage in open, honest discussions, the process may falter. However, for those who embrace its principles, collaborative divorce provides a dignified and effective way to resolve disputes. Marietta families interested in exploring this option can rely on the Tori White Legal Group for guidance and support. With years of experience in family law, Tori White and the team are committed to helping clients achieve fair and respectful outcomes. The firm emphasizes thoughtful communication, transparency, and legal compliance to address all aspects of the divorce thoroughly. Collaborative divorce is more than a legal process-it's a philosophy of resolution that prioritizes mutual respect and cooperation. For families in Marietta, this approach can pave the way for healthier relationships and stronger foundations post-divorce. Tori White and the team at the Tori White Legal Group are dedicated to helping clients handle this process with professionalism and care. About Tori White Legal Group: The Tori White Legal Group, based in Marietta, Georgia, can provide comprehensive family law services with an emphasis on collaborative divorce. Led by Tori White, the firm is dedicated to offering families a respectful and cooperative alternative to traditional divorce, helping them achieve equitable and sustainable outcomes. Embeds: Youtube Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=El44mbs-SFk GMB: https://www.google.com/maps?cid=1652258947136673673 Email and website Email: info@toriwhitelegal.com Website: https://www.toriwhitelegal.com/ Media Contact Company Name: Tori White Legal Group Contact Person: Tori White Email:Send Email [ https://www.abnewswire.com/email_contact_us.php?pr=marietta-collaborative-divorce-lawyer-tori-white-releases-insightful-article-on-collaborative-divorce ] Phone: (770) 744-1529 Address:274 Washington Ave NE City: Marietta State: Georgia 30060 Country: United States Website: https://www.toriwhitelegal.com/ This release was published on openPR.

NoneAccess Hollywood star Kit Hoover SPLITS from husband Crowley Sullivan after 25 years of marriage Have YOU got a story? Email tips@dailymail.com By BRIAN MARKS FOR DAILYMAIL.COM Published: 21:09, 4 December 2024 | Updated: 22:25, 4 December 2024 e-mail 3 View comments Access Hollywood star Kit Hoover and her husband Crowley Sullivan have split. The 54-year-old anchor and Sullivan, who is the CEO of Athlete Advantage, were reported to be separating on Wednesday, according to People . The shock reveal follows a quarter-decade of marriage for the couple. DailyMail.com has reached out to representatives for Hoover for comment. The separating couple share three children: daughters Campbell and Hayes and son Crowley Jr. 'She’s been telling people she is single and getting divorced,' a source claimed to Us Weekly . Access Hollywood star Kit Hoover, 54, and her husband Crowley Sullivan have split, People reported on Wednesday Hoover and Sullivan's marriage dates back to 1999, but the couple had been dating for years beforehand; pictured in 1995 Hoover and Sullivan's marriage dates back to August 1999, but the couple had been dating for years beforehand. The television anchor — who co-hosts Access Daily with Mario Lopez — appears to have telegraphed news of her split, as her estranged husband has been absent from her Instagram posts in recent months. Read More Donald Trump’s notorious 2005 Access Hollywood tape can be used at his defamation trial She also appears to have stopped wearing her wedding ring in recent photos. Notably, Hoover shared a gushing anniversary tribute to her account back in August 2023 for the couple's 24th wedding anniversary, but the event was completely absent from her Instagram when they would have celebrated their silver jubilee this year. 'Holy Cow – We are 24 years old in this pic and NOW – Happy 24th anniversary Honeybun!!! Thanks for loving this lunatic and for our beautiful family that is my EVERYTHING. I love you,' she caption her throwback photo while adding the hashtags '#stillhavingfun,' '#stilltheone,' '#grateful' and '#joyfulliving.' In 2021, she celebrated 22 years of marriage with a throwback photo of the couple that she dated to 1995. One of her last mentions of her estranged husband was in May of this year, when she marked his birthday on social media. 'Happy Birthday to our Head Coach. We love you. GO GREEN!!!' she captioned a photo of Sullivan — who was wearing his wedding ring — and an image of him beaming with their three children. 'She’s been telling people she is single and getting divorced,' a source claimed to Us Weekly Hoover appears to have telegraphed her split, as Sullivan has been absent from her Instagram posts in recent months She also appears to have stopped wearing her wedding ring; pictured with Joe Manganiello Then, in June, she praised Sullivan while celebrating Father's Day. 'Happy Father’s Day to the leader of our wild band,' she wrote on Instagram. 'You’re an incredible Frontman. We love you Dah-Dah-Dadio.' In 2021, Hoover opened up to Woman's World about how she managed to balance her busy career with her marriage and family life. 'I love my work and I’m so grateful for it, but being a working mom, wife and daughter, it’s impossible to do everything well all of the time,' she said. 'There are times you can’t be where you need to be and so different aspects might suffer, but if I try to be present where I am, things usually work out. If you focus on what’s most important, I think it all comes out in the wash.' Hoover added that it was low-key moments at home with her family that brought her joy. 'My husband, kids and I have never been big TV watchers, but we’ve been having a blast bingeing shows these days!' she admitted. 'It’s great for our relationship because it really just gives us the time together as a family to do something fun. And in the tough moments, remembering that connection just brings us closer.' Share or comment on this article: Access Hollywood star Kit Hoover SPLITS from husband Crowley Sullivan after 25 years of marriage e-mail Add comment