777 casino jili

Dragan Marković Palma was born on May 2, 1960 in the village of Končarevo near Jagodina. He comes from a very hard-working family that was engaged in agriculture and small-scale farming, where he himself acquired the habit of working. In his youth, he was involved in sports, and later he proved himself as a recognized sports worker. He is a private entrepreneur and the founder of the ATP "Palma" company, which also includes Palma plus television. Dragan Marković was declared the best Serbian entrepreneur in 1994, and the best Yugoslav manager in 1995. He has been a member of parliament for five terms, and in 2003 he was also a member of the Parliament of Serbia and Montenegro. He is the founder and president of the United Serbia party. Since 2004, he has been at the head of the city of Jagodina. He is the holder of a significant international recognition, the title of Honorary Citizen of the city of Katerini in Greece and Honorary Senator of the Senate of the Economy of Serbia, established in cooperation with the Senate of the Economy of Austria. As a great humanist, he received numerous awards for his achievements and humanitarian work. In 2006, Bishop Jovan of Šumadija presented Dragan Marković Palma with the Order of Saint Simeon the Myrrh-flowing First Degree, as the highest recognition of the Eparchy of Šumadija. The Holy Synod of Bishops of the Serbian Orthodox Church awarded Dragan Marković Palma the highest honor of the Serbian Orthodox Church - the Order of Saint Sava of the First Degree, which was presented to him by Serbian Patriarch Irinej. Dragan Marković Palma with his family and ATP "Palma", which is owned by the Marković family, are the founders of the church of St. John the Baptist in Končarevo. He is married to his wife Snezana, he is the father of sons Dalibor and Darko, of whom he has five grandchildren. This is an irreparable loss for his family, of which he was most proud, for the city of Jagodina, for his United Serbia, but also for all of Serbia. The public will be informed about the date of the funeral later. Podeli:

Social and economic inequalities remain stark. Welfare delivery is uneven and often inefficient, and a policy encouraging bigger households could exacerbate these issues On December 1, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat reignited the debate on India’s population policy with his recent call for parents to consider having three children instead of the current norm of two. Although he did not explicitly state it, Bhagwat was likely alluding to the relatively lower total fertility rates (TFRs) among Hindus compared to Muslims. Bhagwat’s comments have undoubtedly prompted a national conversation about India’s demographic future, highlighting the complex interplay between population growth, economic stability, and societal well-being. As the country grapples with its evolving demographic landscape, the question remains: should India shift its population policies to ensure a sustainable and prosperous future for all? India can take pride in its significant demographic achievement: the reduction in the TFR from over five births per woman in 1965 to 2.01 in 2022. This drop is notable because it has been achieved without resorting to the harsh civil rights abuses seen in China, where the government imposed a one-child policy for 36 years. India’s family planning success is remarkable, given that it has managed to reduce its fertility rate while maintaining a relatively democratic approach—bar the 21 months of Emergency rule in the 1970s. However, this decline in the TFR brings with it both positive and negative consequences. While a TFR below the replacement rate of 2.1 may seem like a sign of progress in controlling population growth, it also signals potential challenges. According to a study by The Lancet, India’s TFR is projected to fall to 1.29 by 2050, which could have serious long-term implications. If this trend holds, India could face the possibility of an ageing population—growing old before it grows rich. This demographic shift presents a set of complex challenges, including the potential for labour shortages, rising healthcare costs, and a shrinking working-age population. Today, as India faces the prospect of demographic stagnation and a falling growth rate, Bhagwat seems to view population expansion as a solution to the problem. While encouraging population growth might seem like an easy fix to accelerate economic growth, this approach overlooks several crucial issues. For one, the economic and social conditions in India are vastly different from those in Scandinavia and other European nations, where policies to encourage childbearing have been successful. In countries such as Sweden and Norway, the welfare state is highly developed, with robust systems of support for families, including equal parental leave, subsidised childcare, and generous social benefits. These policies have been able to balance the demographic goals with social progress, without regressing on gender equality. In contrast, India’s social and economic inequalities remain stark. The country’s welfare delivery is uneven and often inefficient, and a policy encouraging larger families could exacerbate these issues. A three-child norm could undermine the hard-won gains in women’s rights and gender equality in India. Women, particularly those from poorer and more conservative communities, would disproportionately bear the burden of such a policy. In many parts of the country, women are already responsible for the majority of childcare and domestic duties, and increasing family sizes would likely deepen this imbalance. This could have long-lasting consequences for women’s participation in the workforce, which remains low at just 37% – a figure that has been a persistent cause for concern. The trend towards smaller families, which has been led by women, particularly in urban and educated sectors, has been a key driver of their increasing educational and economic empowerment. Any policy that burdens women with additional children is unlikely to improve their labour market participation or their ability to advance in the workforce. The proposal for a three-child norm also raises concerns in specific states that have made significant progress in population control. States like Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, which have already seen the scrapping of two-child restrictions for local elections, may now consider incentivising larger families. This could potentially undermine the progressive policies that have been implemented in southern states such as Tamil Nadu and Kerala, which have been more successful in reducing fertility rates compared to the more populous states of northern India. These southern states, having seen demographic stabilisation, are now concerned that such a national policy would dilute their gains. In the context of Finance Commission awards, population-based resource distribution, and the upcoming delimitation of constituencies, these states may see their relative political power diminished. These concerns are valid and should be addressed at the policy level. Encouraging larger families could thus result in a major step backwards in India’s development trajectory. Rather than focusing on boosting population numbers, the emphasis should shift to strengthening the nation’s education and healthcare systems across the board. This would not only help improve quality of life and life expectancy but would also ensure that India’s workforce is better prepared for the challenges of a rapidly changing global economy. In conclusion, while demographic challenges such as a falling fertility rate need to be addressed, the solution does not lie in draconian policies like a three-child norm. Instead, India’s focus should be on improving public services, empowering women, and ensuring that the benefits of development are equitably distributed across the country. It is through these measures—rather than pushing for higher birth rates—that India can truly ensure a prosperous and sustainable future for its people. (Shivanand Pandit is a tax specialist, financial adviser, author, and guest lecturer based in Goa.)Tributes have poured in for legendary Ibiza DJ Alfredo Fiorito amid reports that he has died, aged 71. Known as the 'Father of the Balearic beat', Alfredo is best known for his work as a DJ on the island of Ibiza, reports the Mirror . It was previously announced that had experienced a stroke back in 2021 and a fundraiser to support him was later launched. This week, amid reports that he has died, there has been an outpouring of tributes. The club that launched his career , Amnesia, paid tribute to Alfredo with a statement about him on Instagram. It read: "Dear Alfredo, Thank you for the nights and beats we shared together. Your music and vision shaped the sound of Balearic Beat and the soul of Amnesia." The post shared on the platform on Tuesday continued: "So many memories were made through your energy, your legacy will live on our dancefloor forever. You will never be forgotten. Rest in peace, Alfredo. The Amnesia Family." There have also been tributes to Alfredo on X, formerly known as Twitter. Sister Bliss wrote: "Very sad to hear the news about DJ Alfredo - my first trip to Ibiza in 92 was to play for him at Amnesia ... safe to say he changed the world of music for the better. Fly high to the great gig in the sky." Whilst Rowetta - who was previously a member of the Happy Mondays - wrote: "So so sad to hear that our friend, Ibiza pioneer DJ Alfredo has left us. He was a legend when I first played KU in 1990 & he always will be. RIP Alfredo." Dave Pearce, a fellow DJ, said: "Sad to learn Ibiza dance music legend Dj Alfredo has passed away - he was a true pioneer of the Ibiza Balearic Sound through his creativity and diversity in the music he mixed creating a wonderful musical journey - Thoughts with his family and friends RIP." They weren't alone in paying tribute to Alfredo, with another post reading: "This is sad to hear. Legendary DJ Alfredo, one of the pioneers of the Balearic sound, has passed away." Someone else wrote: "The legend will be missed." "Will never forget your incredible music selection & DJ sets across the decades. A true inspiration," another person wrote in a post on social media this week. Whilst one fan wrote in a tribute post to Alfredo: "A true pioneer." He moved to mainland Spain in his twenties after growing up in Argentina. He later ended up on the island of Ibiza - which is now well known for its music club scene - where he ventured into DJing . Don't miss the latest news from around Scotland and beyond. Sign up to our daily newsletter .

She didn’t get an apartment because of an AI-generated score – and sued to help others avoid the same fate

New Delhi: Demolition of Babri mosque and Gujarat riots were the greatest failure of Indian Constitution, Trinamool Congress MP Saugata Roy said on Saturday, as opposition leaders from different parties accused the ruling BJP of undermining the Constitution. Participating in a debate on 75 years of the Constitution of India, Roy also accused the Union government of destroying federalist structure of the country. “The greatest failure of the Constitution was when Babri mosque was demolished by the ‘Hindutva walas.’ It was a matter of shame for the whole country,” Roy said. “Another big setback to the Constitution was when Gujarat riots took place under (then) chief minister Modi, that was a matter of shame,” he said. The TMC leader said, “While we are speaking of Savarkar, Modi is today’s Savarkar.” He accused the Centre of not giving states their due share, and said the government is “destroying federalism.” DMK leader A Raja hit out at the BJP, claiming that it would have changed the Constitution had the words “secular” and “socialist” not been added to the Preamble of the document during Emergency. Participating in the debate, Raja also dared the BJP to spell out the contribution of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Hindu Mahasabha to the making of the Constitution. A Union minister in the UPA government, Raja said democracy came under an assault when the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA) was imposed during Emergency, but under the BJP-led government, the basic structure of the Constitution, codified by the Supreme Court in the Kesavananda Bharti case, is under attack. “... in your regime, entire six elements (spelt out in the Kesavananda Bharati case), namely democracy, secularism, rule of law, equality, federalism, judicial impartiality, everything has gone,” Raja said. Congress MP Kumari Selja said, “It has become a trend to first demolish the Constitution and then attempt to resurrect it.” She said introduction of private and contractual jobs has taken away employment opportunities for Dalits. “We speak about the rights of Dalits, but today, equal opportunities have been taken away by introducing private and contractual jobs. What kind of equality are you talking about?” she said. “We demand a caste census because equality will only come when we acknowledge and address the realities... The wealth of the nation should accrue to its people. But today, is it being distributed equally? Without a caste census, who will be the beneficiaries?” she added. On the ongoing farmers’ protest, she said, “You have turned Haryana and Punjab’s borders into something resembling India-Pakistan. Farmers are sitting in protest, and they are being removed. You promised MSP (Minimum Support Price), but where is it? Where is the policy you claimed to have made?” National Conference MP Mian Altaf Ahmad saying that while the Congress apologised for imposing Emergency, the BJP ruling party has been silent on its own actions. Ahmad also slammed the BJP for bifurcating the state of Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories. “Congress has apologised for the Emergency but you are silent on various things you have done... Congress toppled elected governments, but you divided our state into two Union Territories, which was unnecessary,” he said. Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation MP Raja Ram Singh, meanwhile, said the idea of economic equality is also enshrined in the Constitution, and there should be a proportional difference in the salary of the President and a peon. “You want a peon for Rs 5,000 but the CEO gets paid Rs 2.5- 3 crore... Government in encouraging growing economic disparity,” he said. The MP also slammed the BJP for wanting to keep “Gandhi in one pocket, and Savarkar in the other pocket.” “This double standard would not work. BJP is playing with the Constitution, they want to bring communal fascism in this country,” he said. Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP) MP NK Premchandran also pointed out the “growing divide” between the rich and the poor, and referred to the directive principles which speak about minimising inequalities. He accused the BJP government of trying to concentrate wealth and means of production in a few hands. “The fruit of so-called economic development is not reaching the poor and the marginalised,” he said, adding a warning by BR Ambedkar against deepening economic and social inequalities that may destroy the foundation of democracy. Premchandran also said the secular fabric of the country was under threat. He said people of the country did not give absolute majority to the BJP because they wanted to protect the secular character of the nation. AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi expressed his concern over the situation of minorities. “What Babasaheb said 75 years ago remains absolutely true even today — no one wants the minority to share power,” he said. “Let me explain the measure of success of parliamentary democracy. Articles 25, 26, 29, 30, 14, and 21—these fundamental rights form the foundation. By focusing on these, I will illustrate whether justice has truly been served to the weaker sections of society,” he said, citing examples of incidents of harassment against Muslims in the country.USD 360 billion property, 1000 family members, this family is ruling an oil-rich nation since..., it’s not Saudi Arabia2 exciting ASX shares this fund manager thinks are buys

Loadbreak Connector: Power Up with ANHUANG's 24kV 400A Loadbreak Separarable Connector 12-27-2024 08:52 PM CET | Industry, Real Estate & Construction Press release from: ABNewswire Today, we are exploring the realm of load break connectors, especially the remarkable 24kV 400A load break separable connector from ANHUONG. You'll have fun if you've ever wondered how underground cables link to our critical distribution power networks. Let's dissect it understandably together. Image: https://c861.goodao.net/uploads/%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%8722.png Loadbreak Connector [ https://www.ahelek.com/400a-24kv-loadbreak-separable-connector-product/ ] Description Let's begin with the fundamentals. In electrical engineering, a load break connector is an essential component. Consider it as the superhero tying underground lines to power plants. Designed to provide our electrical infrastructure with a secure, dependable, and efficient connection, the 24kV 400A Loadbreak Separable Connector is Perfect for many uses, including pad-mounted transformers and surrounding power supply branch boxes; this particular connector is shielded and insulated. Maintaining the operationality of electrical systems during maintenance or fault conditions depends much on load break connectors. These connectors let one safely disconnect a part of the power system, reducing the hazards. The safety of specialists operating on the systems and the integrity of the power supply depend on it. Why 400A 24kV? You might now be wondering why one would concentrate on 24kV and 400A. These figures then represent the voltage and current the connector can manage. Said another way, 400A (amperes) denotes the current capacity; 24kV (kilovolts) is the highest voltage. Therefore, strong electrical systems depend on our load break connector since it effectively controls high power levels. Value of Voltage and Current Ratitudes The particular values of 24kV and 400A are not arbitrary; rather, they are vital to guarantee that the connector can meet contemporary electrical systems' needs. While the 400A rating implies that it can withstand high current loads and is frequently used in industrial and commercial power systems, the 24kV rating guarantees compatibility with medium voltage applications. This great capacity is especially essential in sectors with high demand for power, such as nuclear plants, where continuous and dependable power supply is non-negotiable. Connector's anatomy How, then, does the 24kV 400A Loadbreak Separable Connector tick? It's mostly about its elements! The bushing and connector inserts are two important players cooperating to create a safe connection. The bushing insert lets you safely transfer electrical energy from the underground cable into the connector. This arrangement greatly reduces the possibility of electrical problems, therefore benefiting safety! Parts and Utility The connector's outside is made to be durable and insulating. It shields the internal parts from external elements, including dust and moisture, that could cause electrical problems. Safely moving electrical energy depends on this component, a bushing insert. It keeps a barrier against unintentional touch and offers a channel for current to pass. Crucially for maintenance and troubleshooting, the detachable design lets workers disconnect the load without upsetting the system. Complete Shielded: The connector's shielding guarantees safety and lowers electromagnetic interference (EMI), influencing the operation of surrounding equipment. Load break Connector's advantages Let's discuss the advantages of running the 24kV 400A Loadbreak Separable Connector. Some notable elements are: Safety First: This connector shields against accidental contact with live components with its covered form. Any electrical arrangement has safety as its priority! This safety precaution is crucial for professionals who sometimes operate in dangerous surroundings. ANHUANG has designed this connector for simple installation, reducing the time spent fussing over intricate configurations and allowing more time to enjoy consistent power. User-friendly elements in the design enable faster assembly and disassembly. Made with premium materials, this connector can resist the stresses of different surroundings. This connector is made to last, whether it comes from heat, cold, or wetness. Its lifetime guarantees continuous operation and lessens the need for regular replacements. Whether you are working with a basic branch box or a nuclear power station, this connector can manage it all. Its adaptability adds great value to every electrical toolset. Urban infrastructure, rural electrification, and industrial uses are just a few places it finds use. Long-term, cost-effective savings from this connector come from guaranteeing dependability and lowering the frequency of maintenance and replacements. Over time, investing in premium parts such as the 24kV 400A Loadbreak Separable Connector can result in notable cost savings. Image: https://c861.goodao.net/uploads/%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%8732.png ANHUANG [ https://www.ahelek.com/]: Your Source for Medium Voltage Solutions Knowing the nuances of the 24kV 400A Loadbreak Separable Connector, let us now discuss ANHUANG, its manufacturer. Originally founded in 2004, ANHUANG has become a top producer of medium voltage cable accessories. Offering OEM and ODM services catered to customer needs, they have a committed staff designing and manufacturing molds in-house. An overview of a brief history Starting with high-voltage fuses, Anhang's path was developed to incorporate cable connectors and lightning arresters. Their dedication to effective management and quality control has driven them to unprecedented heights, allowing them to service customers throughout China and beyond-including nations like Italy, the USA, and Russia. The company's emphasis on invention and customer happiness helps to explain its explosive expansion. Excellence and Creativity ANHUANG distinguishes itself by always striving for excellence and innovation. The company guarantees its products meet and surpass industry criteria by actively investing in research and development. This dedication to quality has attracted a devoted clientele and established ANHUANG as a reliable name in the electrical components market. Who might find use for this connector? Not only do electrical engineers benefit from the 24kV 400A load break separable connector, but This connector is also made with you in mind whether your job is that of a facilities manager overseeing power systems, a contractor working on utility projects, or an electrician seeking dependable components. It's ideal for folks between eighteen and forty eager to keep or improve the electrical infrastructure. Training the Next Generation This connector also makes an excellent teaching tool for future engineers and electricians. Knowing its uses and operation will help one to have a great understanding of electrical systems and their parts. ANHUANG also supports educational projects by providing tools and training for anyone curious about medium voltage solutions. Finally, energizing your initiatives. The ANHUANG 24kV 400A Loadbreak Separable Connector [ https://www.ahelek.com/400a-24kv-loadbreak-separable-connector-product/ ] changes the field of electrical connections. Professionals and enthusiasts choose it first because of its safety aspects, simplicity of installation, durability, and adaptability. Look only at ANHUANG's load break connector if you can improve your electrical systems and guarantee a consistent power supply. Investing in premium components like this will make all the difference, whether your project starts from scratch or updates an old system. Media Contact Company Name: Anhuang Electric Power Technology Co., Ltd. Email:Send Email [ https://www.abnewswire.com/email_contact_us.php?pr=loadbreak-connector-power-up-with-anhuangs-24kv-400a-loadbreak-separ ] Country: China Website: https://www.ahelek.com/ This release was published on openPR.New York has repealed a seldom-used, more than century-old law that made it a crime to cheat on your spouse - a misdemeanour that once could have landed adulterers in jail for three months. Governor Kathy Hochul signed a bill repealing the statute, which dates back to 1907 and has long been considered antiquated as well as difficult to enforce. "While I've been fortunate to share a loving married life with my husband for 40 years - making it somewhat ironic for me to sign a bill decriminalising adultery - I know that people often have complex relationships," she said on Friday. "These matters should clearly be handled by these individuals and not our criminal justice system. Let's take this silly, outdated statute off the books, once and for all." Adultery bans are actually law in several states and were enacted to make it harder to get a divorce at a time when proving a spouse cheated was the only way to get a legal separation. Charges have been rare and convictions even rarer. Some states have also moved to repeal their adultery laws in recent years. New York defined adultery as when a person "engages in sexual intercourse with another person at a time when he has a living spouse, or the other person has a living spouse." The state's law was first used a few weeks after it went into effect, according to a New York Times article, to arrest a married man and 25-year-old woman. State Assembly member Charles Lavine, sponsor of the bill, said about a dozen people have been charged under the law since the 1970s, and five of those cases resulted in convictions. "Laws are meant to protect our community and to serve as a deterrent to anti-social behaviour. New York's adultery law advanced neither purpose," Lavine said in a statement Friday. The state's law appears to have last been used in 2010, against a woman who was caught engaging in a sex act in a park, but the adultery charge was later dropped as part of a plea deal. New York came close to repealing the law in the 1960s after a state commission tasked with evaluating the penal code said it was nearly impossible to enforce. At the time, lawmakers were initially on board with removing the ban but eventually decided to keep it after a politician argued that repealing it would make it seem like the state was officially endorsing infidelity, according to a New York Times article from 1965.

Tesla and X CEO Elon Musk spent over a quarter of a billion dollars to help get President-elect Donald Trump back in the White House, according to newly released campaign finance records. The billionaire tech mogul spent over $270 million of his own money through two super PACs that promoted Trump's candidacy and other Republicans, including one that appeared to refer to deceased liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, according to filings released Thursday night by the Federal Election Commission. Musk spent roughly $240 million on his pro-Trump super PAC America. The PAC was created after Musk endorsed Trump in July, which made Musk the single largest political spender in the shortest period of time. Half of the PAC's money came in the final weeks of the election and in the weeks following the election, and by Nov. 25, the PAC only had $2 million left in the account, according to the FEC. Much of the money was spent on direct mail, canvassing and phone calls, the PAC's filing showed. MORE: Hegseth, Trump's defense pick, paid settlement to woman who accused him of sexual assault, lawyer says The filing also showed a total of nine $1 million payments given to nine individuals labeled as "spokesperson consultant," which appeared to be the swing state voters that won Musk's controversial daily $1 million prize. Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner sued the PAC in October contending Musk was running an illegal lottery in Pennsylvania. Common Pleas Court Judge Angelo Foglietta denied an injunction request a few weeks later after an attorney for the PAC testified that the giveaway wasn't random, despite Musk's claims that they were. The PAC also reported roughly $433,000 in legal bills paid to THE GOBER GROUP PLLC, according to the FEC. A new filing showed that Musk was the sole funder of a pro-Trump super PAC named RBG PAC, giving $20 million to the group in the final weeks of the election. The PAC used the initials of former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg and ran online ads featuring women who claimed Trump would endorse potential national abortion bans. Trump has long boasted about his role in ending Roe v. Wade by taking credit for nominating three of the six conservative justices who voted to overturn the case in 2022. Clara Spera, Ginsberg's granddaughter, chastised the PAC in a statement to the Washington Post stating it "has no connection to the Ginsburg family and is an affront to my late grandmother’s legacy." Earlier in the election cycle, Musk had written big checks to groups supporting House and Senate GOP, including $12.3 million to two super PACs supporting Senate GOP candidates, and another $1.3 million supporting other down-ballot Republicans, according to FEC filings. MORE: Musk, Ramaswamy eyeing federal remote work policies to help slash $2T from budget In all, Musk spent at least $273 million in support of various Republicans up and down the ballot at the federal level. Musk has been tapped to co-lead, along with Republican businessman and failed presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, an outside advisory board called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which aims to cut as much as $2 trillion from the federal budget of what they called waste. The pair met with Republican leaders on the Hill Thursday to discuss their proposals including removing remote work options for federal workers.A Closer Look at Rumble's Options Market DynamicsThe Aaron Rodgers experience in New York has fallen flat, which leaves the Jets again thinking about the future at quarterback amid a lost season that is essentially dead before Thanksgiving Day. Owner Woody Johnson wanted head coach Robert Saleh and general manager Joe Douglas to dump Rodgers for backup quarterback Tyrod Taylor a month into the campaign when the team was 2-2. The brass refused, and both Saleh and Douglas have been fired since. Rodgers has one year remaining on his contract, but the Jets can release him or trade him ahead of next season, which both seem more likely outcomes now than the soon to be 41-year-old returning to the franchise in 2025. Joe Camporeale/Getty Images Free agency is shaky at best, with Sam Darnold of the Minnesota Vikings -- formerly the No. 3 overall pick of the Jets in the 2018 NFL draft, who bombed out in New York after three seasons -- entering the 2025 class as arguably the top available QB alongside Pittsburgh Steelers backup Justin Fields . Trading for a Super Bowl-caliber signal caller is exceedingly difficult, as the Jets just proved after their failed attempt to do so via a deal for Rodgers with the Green Bay Packers just two years ago. That leaves New York with one option -- the 2025 draft. That isn't a foolproof plan either, despite the fact that were the draft held today, the Jets would select No. 6 overall . The reasons for uncertainty are two: first, the 2025 class isn't overly deep at the QB position. Second, New York is currently behind at least three teams in the Las Vegas Raiders , New York Giants and Tennessee Titans that are liable to look QB as well come April. Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images However, the Jacksonville Jaguars currently own the No. 1 pick and just inked QB Trevor Lawrence to a $275 million extension that ties the franchise to him through 2030. So, the first pick in the draft could essentially come down to a scenario where the best trade offer to the Jags wins the rights to Colorado Buffaloes signal caller, Shedeur Sanders . The Jets would undoubtedly need to include the No. 6 pick and more, likely another first-round selection in 2026 and then some, to move up the five spots to secure Sanders. However, doing so might also allow New York to fill its head coaching vacancy in the process. Jeff Ulbrich is the interim head coach, but the Jets could potentially replace him with Deion Sanders -- Shedeur Sanders' father and head coach at Colorado -- as a package deal. There are other teams certainly that would be interested in Shedeur Sanders as the QB of the future, and there may also be multiple franchises interested in adding the dynamic father-son duo. The Jets could get into that game by making a big move ahead of the draft and trading into the No. 1 spot, which is what it will likely take to bring what is otherwise a contending-caliber roster in New York into the Super Bowl conversation in the coming years. Related: Could Shedeur Sanders Be Aaron Rodgers' Replacement?