jollibee 6 pcs www jilibet.com jollibee breakfast menu ubet casino login jolibet 3 login
Current location: jilibet slots > jollibee 6 pcs > is jilibet legit

is jilibet legit

Release time: 2025-01-15 | Source: Unknown
is jilibet legit
is jilibet legit HOUSTON , Dec. 19, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- The Sterling Group, a Houston -based, operationally focused middle market private equity firm, is pleased to announce that John Griffin and Claudine Lussier have been promoted to Partner. "We are excited to recognize the extraordinary contributions of John and Claudine," said Brad Staller , Partner at The Sterling Group. "Each has played a critical part in Sterling's success to date. We are thrilled to celebrate their accomplishments and welcome them as Partners." John Griffin , Partner, joined Sterling in 2018 from McKinsey & Company's Houston office where he focused on strategic and operational initiatives for industrial and energy companies. John has been a leader on the PrimeFlight Aviation, West Star Aviation, Fencing Supply Group, Tangent Technologies, and Lynx FBO Network investment teams. John has also been a key member of the firm's Operations Committee, which drives continuous improvement in Sterling's own value creation capabilities. Claudine Lussier , Partner, Human Capital, joined Sterling in 2017 to lead Human Capital at Sterling and its portfolio companies. During Claudine's time at Sterling, she has contributed to a significant build-out of the team and has driven a dramatic improvement in Sterling's ability to drive value creation through the Human Capital lever. Claudine is a critical business partner to investment teams and management teams alike. To learn more about a career at The Sterling Group, please visit www.sterling-group.com/careers/ About The Sterling Group Founded in 1982, The Sterling Group is a private equity and private credit investment firm that targets investments in basic manufacturing, distribution, and industrial services companies. Typical enterprise values of these companies at initial formation range from $100 million to $750 million . Sterling has sponsored the buyout of 73 platform companies and numerous add-on acquisitions for a total transaction value of over $24 billion . Sterling currently has $9.4 billion of assets under management. For further information, please visit www.sterling-group.com . Past performance is no guarantee of future results and all investments are subject to loss. View original content: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-sterling-group-names-two-new-partners-302336718.html SOURCE The Sterling Group, L.P.Digital e-readers have transformed the reading landscape in three significant ways: mobility, sustainability, and abundance. However, as many have predicted, has this medium truly changed the future of reading? Bibliophiles remain loyal to printed materials. They often use digital e-readers primarily as a backup. According to Google statistics, around 83% of readers are more likely to purchase a printed version of a new, popular, or classic book. At the same time, they use their e-readers to hold free or mediocre books they plan to read at a leisurely pace. Printed books have been a cornerstone of education and entertainment for centuries. “Paper” and “writing sources” have documented history and facilitated communication throughout the ages. Without writing, much of our past would remain unknown. Historians feel a responsibility to honor our history by preserving the art of writing on paper, and I believe this will never change. Books offer an immersive experience that many readers find comforting and nostalgic. The rustle of pages, the smell of paper, the need for beautiful bookmarks, and the tangible weight of a book provide a sensory experience that digital devices cannot replicate. Even with the rise of digital media, traditional books continue to thrive. As the population ages, will this change? Does the younger generation appreciate printed materials in the same way? Or will sustainability concerns outweigh the need for paper? Will books become mere fuel for future generations? Imagine a post-catapultic world where burning books is the new form of heating and electricity. Older people may cringe at this thought, while younger people might hold their e-readers high and say, we stored those books in here. What does it matter if we burn books when we need to save the world? Perspective and time are everything. There are notable advantages to printed books. They require no batteries or electricity, making them reliable in any setting, such as a cabin in the woods or a campsite where fire is the only light source. Books add an aesthetic value to a space, serving as decor and conversation starters. As e-readers become more prevalent, the value of printed books will increase. Like many other antiquated objects, they may become a symbol of wealth and prosperity. I suggest keeping your books in sealed plastic, which may become valuable. E-readers have revolutionized how we access and consume written content. Devices like the Kindle, Nook, and Kobo offer readers a portable library at their fingertips. With the ability to store thousands of books in a single device, e-readers cater to the modern reader’s mobility, convenience, and variety needs. However, they do not provide the exact immersive experience. E-ink technology simulates a paper-like feel, and with its lightweight and compact design, e-readers are perfect for on-the-go reading. And their long battery life makes them suitable for quick trips to the cabin. Features like adjustable font sizes, backlighting, and text-to-speech enhance accessibility for a broader audience, allowing all readers to access a vast array of books and publications. The rise of digital reading has also significantly impacted writing. It has changed how authors create and distribute their work. Independent authors can now self-publish and reach global audiences, allowing diverse voices to be heard. They can maintain creative control and receive a larger share of royalties. Writers can engage directly with their audience through social media and digital platforms, fostering a more interactive marketing strategy. For now, the coexistence of traditional books and e-readers reflects a broader trend in the media landscape, where digital and analog formats complement rather than replace one another. However, this ongoing battle will likely grow and change as the world gains more access to digital services and the need for sustainability rises to the forefront of global discussion. Global warming will take a back seat in the next few years, so it is unlikely that there will be an enormous shift in the reading world. Whether one prefers the classic charm of a hardcover or the sleek efficiency of an e-reader, the battle rages on, and no one knows for sure. Regardless, the love for reading and writing continues to thrive. Books and e-readers do not win readers’ hearts; the stories within them do. Image by from Writing has always been her passion and a voice for those who cannot speak. She considers herself fortunate to write every day and says her mantra is, "I drink coffee, write, and I know about people and technology." Her writing is diverse and can be found online on websites like LifeHack, You Have a Calling, Medium, TechCrunch and, She Knows.

Gandey (Giridih): The counting of votes for the 2024 Jharkhand Assembly elections begins on Saturday, with all eyes on the Gandey constituency in Giridih district. A crucial seat in the state, Gandey has witnessed intense competition this year, particularly between Kalpana Soren of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) and Muniya Devi of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The outcome is uncertain, as both parties have invested heavily in the region, with local issues and national politics fueling the electoral battle. In a state-wide election that saw a strong voter turnout of 68.01%, Gandey recorded an impressive 73.36% participation, underscoring the significance of this contest. Voting was conducted from 7 am to 6 pm on Wednesday, marking the end of an intense electoral exercise. Kalpana Soren, the sitting MLA and wife of Chief Minister Hemant Soren, is seeking re-election from Gandey. She has a solid track record, having won the seat in a by-election in May 2024 by a comfortable margin of over 27,000 votes. With strong local support, she remains a formidable contender, despite facing opposition from the BJP. Muniya Devi, a newcomer to mainstream politics, has been fielded by the BJP. Though relatively unknown at the state level, she has local experience, having served as the District Council member and president of the Jamua Council. Her entry into the BJP in 2023 has brought a fresh perspective to the party’s campaign in the region. Representing the Jharkhand Loktantrik Congress Morcha (JLKM), Md Aqueel Akhtar is seen as a lesser-known figure in the Gandey contest. His limited presence on the ground has made him less influential compared to the leading contenders. Bangladeshi Infiltration: One of the key issues dominating the Gandey election is the alleged infiltration of Bangladeshi nationals into the Santhal Pargana region. Hemant Soren has raised concerns about how this issue is affecting the tribal demographic. He has accused the BJP-led central government of not addressing illegal immigration, further politicizing the matter. Corruption Allegations: Corruption has been a major talking point for the BJP, with allegations against the ruling JMM government. The BJP has also criticized JMM's monthly cash transfer scheme, calling it ineffective and a tool for political manipulation, while JMM defends it as essential welfare for the poor. In the 2019 Jharkhand Assembly elections, the seat was won by Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmad of JMM, who defeated BJP’s Jai Prakash Verma by 8,855 votes.Amazon Offering Kindle Unlimited For Just 99p in the UK



A 7-year-old rivalry between tech leaders Elon Musk and Sam Altman over who should run OpenAI and prevent an artificial intelligence "dictatorship" is now heading to a federal judge as Musk seeks to halt the ChatGPT maker's ongoing shift into a for-profit company. Musk, an early OpenAI investor and board member, sued the artificial intelligence company earlier this year alleging it had betrayed its founding aims as a nonprofit research lab benefiting the public good rather than pursuing profits. Musk has since escalated the dispute, adding new claims and asking for a court order that would stop OpenAI’s plans to convert itself into a for-profit business more fully. The world's richest man, whose companies include Tesla, SpaceX and social media platform X, last year started his own rival AI company, xAI. Musk says it faces unfair competition from OpenAI and its close business partner Microsoft, which has supplied the huge computing resources needed to build AI systems such as ChatGPT. “OpenAI and Microsoft together exploiting Musk’s donations so they can build a for-profit monopoly, one now specifically targeting xAI, is just too much,” says Musk's filing that alleges the companies are violating the terms of Musk’s foundational contributions to the charity. OpenAI filed a response Friday opposing Musk’s requested order, saying it would “debilitate OpenAI’s business” and mission to the advantage of Musk and his own AI company and is based on “far-fetched” legal claims. A hearing is set for January before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California. At the heart of the dispute is a 2017 internal power struggle at the fledgling startup that led to Altman becoming OpenAI's CEO. Musk also sought to be CEO and in an email outlined a plan where he would “unequivocally have initial control of the company” but said that would be temporary. He grew frustrated after two other OpenAI co-founders said he would hold too much power as a major shareholder and chief executive if the startup succeeded in its goal to achieve better-than-human AI known as artificial general intelligence , or AGI. Musk has long voiced concerns about how advanced forms of AI could threaten humanity. “The current structure provides you with a path where you end up with unilateral absolute control over the AGI," said a 2017 email to Musk from co-founders Ilya Sutskever and Greg Brockman. “You stated that you don't want to control the final AGI, but during this negotiation, you've shown to us that absolute control is extremely important to you.” In the same email, titled “Honest Thoughts,” Sutskever and Brockman also voiced concerns about Altman's desire to be CEO and whether he was motivated by “political goals.” Altman eventually succeeded in becoming CEO, and has remained so except for a period last year when he was fired and then reinstated days later after the board that ousted him was replaced. OpenAI published the messages Friday in a blog post meant to show its side of the story, particularly Musk's early support for the idea of making OpenAI a for-profit business so it could raise money for the hardware and computer power that AI needs. It was Musk, through his wealth manager Jared Birchall, who first registered “Open Artificial Intelligence Technologies, Inc.,” a public benefit corporation, in September 2017. Then came the “Honest Thoughts” email that Musk described as the “final straw.” “Either go do something on your own or continue with OpenAI as a nonprofit,” Musk wrote back. OpenAI said Musk later proposed merging the startup into Tesla before resigning as the co-chair of OpenAI's board in early 2018. Musk didn't respond to emailed requests for comment sent to his companies Friday. Asked about his frayed relationship with Musk at a New York Times conference last week, Altman said he felt “tremendously sad” but also characterized Musk’s legal fight as one about business competition. “He’s a competitor and we’re doing well,” Altman said. He also said at the conference that he is “not that worried” about the Tesla CEO’s influence with President-elect Donald Trump. OpenAI said Friday that Altman plans to make a $1 million personal donation to Trump’s inauguration fund, joining a number of tech companies and executives who are working to improve their relationships with the incoming administration. —————————— The Associated Press and OpenAI have a licensing and technology agreement allowing OpenAI access to part of the AP’s text archives. This story has been updated to correct the name of the company registered in 2017. It was Open Artificial Intelligence Technologies, Inc., not Open Artificial Technologies Technologies, Inc.NoneThe left loves to virtue signal and pretend that they are the party of tolerance and compassion, but all you ever need to do is give them a little rope and they will run with it to show you who they truly are. After 1,200 Jews were murdered and hundreds more taken hostage by terrorists in the pogrom of Oct. 7, it took mere days for the left to let their antisemitism shine. Whether they were tearing down posters of hostages or finding Jewish students at American colleges to terrorize , it became pretty clear that far too many on the left in America sympathized and sided with Hamas. More recently, we have seen the left lionize the deranged assassin Luigi Mangione, swooning over him after he killed United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson in cold blood. One of the leading 'progressive' publications even said that such political violence is 'normal' and that we should get used to it . Given this context, it comes as no surprise that the left is embracing assassination as a political weapon and we're starting to see it on display in some of the most 'liberal' places in America. This week in Seattle, a roadside construction sign displayed a horrific message both celebrating Mangione's actions and threatening other American CEOs. BREAKING: An electronic traffic sign in Seattle, Washington, was programmed to display the text “ONE LESS CEO, MANY MORE TO GO.” It is still unknown who is responsible for programming the sign. pic.twitter.com/r82Fjv4YaC The Seattle Department of Transportation denied that this sign was operated by the city government. It appears it was operated by a private contractor . The electronic message board was being used by construction and development company 601 Holdings LLC while it builds a hotel and apartment building nearby, The Seattle Times reported. William Choi, a spokesperson for the developer, said they rented the message board from National Barricade, which programs the displayed messages. A person who answered the phone at National Barricade said they didn't know anything about the message when contacted by The Seattle Times. Choi said that the sign's message can be changed using a keyboard, which is locked and requires a password to access. He added that no one at 601 Holdings LLC knows the code to operate the keyboard. 'We are appalled at the message and had no part in changing the display,' Choi told The Seattle Times . 'We're not political.' Meanwhile, in New York City, a different type of threat is unfolding. Instead of tearing down hostage posters, this time the left is putting posters up. Wanted posters. Wanted posters of healthcare CEOs are reportedly starting to pop up in NYC, per Reddit: pic.twitter.com/YH1K4nSEnD From Fox5 New York : The posters, which have drawn significant attention, were highlighted in a TikTok video posted Tuesday. They name various health care industry executives and include statements like 'Denying medical care for corporate profit' and 'Healthcare CEOs should not feel safe,' printed in bold capital letters alongside their pictures. The NYPD says they're aware of the posters and advised companies to increase security measures for their executives. 'We are aware of the posters and are investigating these incidents,' a spokesperson from the NYPD’s Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Public Information, told FOX Business. Yeah, we're sure that the police in Seattle and New York are going to get to the bottom of this right away. [Sarcasm font] This kind of garbage has happened before in Seattle. They won’t do anything about it. The same city where the hostage posters were routinely torn down. And still are. https://t.co/AtAXOrxOcX Whoever is responsible for these vile messages, one thing we have learned from the left's antisemitic demonstrations after Oct. 7 is that these efforts are generally organized and funded. It's highly unlikely that these signs and posters are the result of 'lone wolves,' though that is possible. Someone is behind this. We need to expose whoever it is. Who is funding the bounties? Pull this thread. And if there was any doubt that these types of messages are being glorified by an increasing number of leftists, all you have to do is look at some of the truly vile responses on Twitter to the tweets above from Libs of TikTok and Unusual Whales. The reputations of insurance companies and their CEOs, generally speaking, not good, at all. There is a rebellion underway. What will be the response, not legally, but ethically and morally? https://t.co/bLepG54RFa We know what the response to this person should be. An FBI investigation. It got much worse from other, more anonymous accounts. Anyone have printable copies? 🖤 #AbolishTheCEOs https://t.co/GPP20iWYwI Love it. Hope it expands https://t.co/usahmia5Qh See I’m okay with this https://t.co/UfQa5uGMF8 Eat the rich pic.twitter.com/J4HTFdISye Healthcare CEOs have killed so many people. People are angry. Rightly so. It’s a call for systemic change, not violence. Yikes. No, Peter Lombard. It is an explicit call for violence. And you know it. Not only do you know it, you cheer it on. If there were comments like these on Twitter, we can't imagine what kind of violence was being advocated over on BlueSky. Frankly, we almost don't want to know (even though we probably should). Thankfully, sanity is still the dominant mindset on Twitter and most people were calling out the left for showing everyone who they are. This is insane and this doesn’t end well. https://t.co/KyrK0OhiYt The FBI may have had a point when it announced domestic terrorism as one of our biggest threats. They just got the party wrong. They blamed people silently praying outside of abortion clinics instead of people openly calling for murder. Disgusting https://t.co/O6aWCUP9ac Democrats truly are sick people. https://t.co/jcz5DXj8ub It is tempting to offer the qualification 'Not all Democrats,' but we can't really do that until we see some of them speaking out against this. Instead, we get AOC and Elizabeth Warren saying horrific things like, 'Violence is not the answer, BUT ...' The "tolerant, loving" left... https://t.co/mBPRcbwOXu The left gets more violent and revolting by the day. It’s not ok to kill or hurt people because you don’t like their jobs or politics!! Brownshirts are how the Nazis got started and it really feels like the left is heading down the same ugly path. This is encouraging anarcho-terrorist activity. It sounds a lot like one of AOC's favorite phrases: 'Stochastic terrorism.' Because the left loves projection. Scum. Not the ceos, but the people posting these and perpetuating violence Blue cities are woke cesspools No argument here. These people are morally bankrupt. https://t.co/QsLe7PFGfw No argument against that either. The peace loving left never fail to call for violence. Yep. It's just what they do. Of course, many on Twitter also claimed that these acts were just a 'psyop.' Because Twitter loves to call everything a psyop. But when you have the media excusing assassins and Democrat politicians justifying political violence, is it any surprise that leftists would feel emboldened in their actions to call for more violence? Sure, it could be a psyop. But we think Occam's Razor is far more likely. The left is doing this because they are being encouraged to do it. This is who they are.

Eagles seek 7th straight win while Rams try to keep pace in crowded NFC West raceJimmy Carter Passes Away With One Final Parting Gift for Trump

S outh Africa finished their 2024 campaign as they started it: with victory over Wales. This was the most expected of successes against Wales, whose staggering sequence of losses continued in Cardiff. The home side have developed into a team of inveterate losers; it’s easy to look at the Springboks in a diametrically opposed light. Easy, but inaccurate. For all the success of the Springboks under Rassie Erasmus, including two World Cups (one as director of rugby but never anything but the main man) and the 2024 Rugby Championship, they don’t have the winning runs that the All Blacks and England under Eddie Jones clocked up this century. Victory at the Principality was about the result, not the performance, although they were brutally brilliant in the first 20 minutes when the game was in effect taken away from Wales. Here we saw a glimpse of where this team are going. The speed of ruck enabled both second-rows, Franco Mostert and Eben Etzebeth, to blast through retreating Welsh defence for glorious tries.

'Let's not panic': Canada picks up the pieces after ugly Latvia loss at world juniorsKyiv claims ‘crazy’ Russia fired nuke-capable missileLeading CEOs from the tech industry are reportedly courting favor with President-elect Donald Trump , indicating a significant change in corporate America’s approach towards his upcoming term. What Happened : High-profile business leaders have been visiting Trump at his Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago, marking a stark contrast to the reception he received following his 2016 election victory. Among the attendees were Amazon’s Jeff Bezos , Apple’s Tim Cook , Google’s Sundar Pichai , and TikTok’s CEO Shou Zi Chew . Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg had a meeting with Trump last month. Trump, who secured his election victory with 49.8 percent of the vote, shared his enthusiasm on Truth Social, saying that “EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE MY FRIEND!!!” He also observed a marked shift in attitude compared to his first term, noting that there seems to be a greater willingness to cooperate this time around. Former Microsoft CEO Bill Gates is also said to have requested a visit. Also Read: Why Trump Wants Debt Ceiling Killed Before He Takes Office In a post on Truth Social on Friday, Trump said that Gates had asked to come to Mar-a-Lago. The 78-year-old Republican encouraged him to visit. "Where are you? When are you coming to the ‘Center of the Universe,' Mar-a-Lago. Bill Gates asked to come, tonight. We miss you and x! New Year's Eve is going to be AMAZING!!!" Trump wrote. He signed it "DJT." Why It Matters : This change in corporate America’s stance towards Trump could be motivated by a desire for influence or a fear of potential backlash. Major corporations such as Amazon, Meta, OpenAI, and Perplexity have pledged to donate $1 million each to Trump’s inaugural fund. This shift underlines the importance of political engagement for these tech giants, who are likely seeking to ensure their interests are represented in the upcoming administration. Read Next Here's How Ray Dalio Thinks Trump's Second Term Could Reshape the US and the World This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Virginia reacts to death of former President Jimmy Carter

The Sterling Group Names Two New PartnersTake Profits In WM Technology (Rating Downgrade)

The AP Top 25 men’s college basketball poll is back every week throughout the season! Get the poll delivered straight to your inbox with AP Top 25 Poll Alerts. Sign up here . ATLANTA (AP) — Ahmad Robinson scored 21 points as Mercer beat Georgia State 71-68 on Saturday. Robinson had nine rebounds, 10 assists, and three steals for the Bears (7-6). Tyler Johnson went 7 of 15 from the field (3 for 10 from 3-point range) to add 19 points. Cam Bryant shot 4 for 7, including 3 for 6 from beyond the arc to finish with 11 points. The Bears outscored the Panthers 10-4 over the final 4 1/2 minutes. The Panthers (4-9) were led in scoring by Cesare Edwards, who finished with 20 points and two steals. Georgia State also got 14 points from Malachi Brown. Zarigue Nutter also put up 14 points and four assists. The Panthers prolonged their losing streak to six straight. ___ The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .

What medical experts think of RFK Jr.’s health department nominationThe Sterling Group Names Two New Partners

is jilibet legit
is jilibet legit HOUSTON , Dec. 19, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- The Sterling Group, a Houston -based, operationally focused middle market private equity firm, is pleased to announce that John Griffin and Claudine Lussier have been promoted to Partner. "We are excited to recognize the extraordinary contributions of John and Claudine," said Brad Staller , Partner at The Sterling Group. "Each has played a critical part in Sterling's success to date. We are thrilled to celebrate their accomplishments and welcome them as Partners." John Griffin , Partner, joined Sterling in 2018 from McKinsey & Company's Houston office where he focused on strategic and operational initiatives for industrial and energy companies. John has been a leader on the PrimeFlight Aviation, West Star Aviation, Fencing Supply Group, Tangent Technologies, and Lynx FBO Network investment teams. John has also been a key member of the firm's Operations Committee, which drives continuous improvement in Sterling's own value creation capabilities. Claudine Lussier , Partner, Human Capital, joined Sterling in 2017 to lead Human Capital at Sterling and its portfolio companies. During Claudine's time at Sterling, she has contributed to a significant build-out of the team and has driven a dramatic improvement in Sterling's ability to drive value creation through the Human Capital lever. Claudine is a critical business partner to investment teams and management teams alike. To learn more about a career at The Sterling Group, please visit www.sterling-group.com/careers/ About The Sterling Group Founded in 1982, The Sterling Group is a private equity and private credit investment firm that targets investments in basic manufacturing, distribution, and industrial services companies. Typical enterprise values of these companies at initial formation range from $100 million to $750 million . Sterling has sponsored the buyout of 73 platform companies and numerous add-on acquisitions for a total transaction value of over $24 billion . Sterling currently has $9.4 billion of assets under management. For further information, please visit www.sterling-group.com . Past performance is no guarantee of future results and all investments are subject to loss. View original content: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-sterling-group-names-two-new-partners-302336718.html SOURCE The Sterling Group, L.P.Digital e-readers have transformed the reading landscape in three significant ways: mobility, sustainability, and abundance. However, as many have predicted, has this medium truly changed the future of reading? Bibliophiles remain loyal to printed materials. They often use digital e-readers primarily as a backup. According to Google statistics, around 83% of readers are more likely to purchase a printed version of a new, popular, or classic book. At the same time, they use their e-readers to hold free or mediocre books they plan to read at a leisurely pace. Printed books have been a cornerstone of education and entertainment for centuries. “Paper” and “writing sources” have documented history and facilitated communication throughout the ages. Without writing, much of our past would remain unknown. Historians feel a responsibility to honor our history by preserving the art of writing on paper, and I believe this will never change. Books offer an immersive experience that many readers find comforting and nostalgic. The rustle of pages, the smell of paper, the need for beautiful bookmarks, and the tangible weight of a book provide a sensory experience that digital devices cannot replicate. Even with the rise of digital media, traditional books continue to thrive. As the population ages, will this change? Does the younger generation appreciate printed materials in the same way? Or will sustainability concerns outweigh the need for paper? Will books become mere fuel for future generations? Imagine a post-catapultic world where burning books is the new form of heating and electricity. Older people may cringe at this thought, while younger people might hold their e-readers high and say, we stored those books in here. What does it matter if we burn books when we need to save the world? Perspective and time are everything. There are notable advantages to printed books. They require no batteries or electricity, making them reliable in any setting, such as a cabin in the woods or a campsite where fire is the only light source. Books add an aesthetic value to a space, serving as decor and conversation starters. As e-readers become more prevalent, the value of printed books will increase. Like many other antiquated objects, they may become a symbol of wealth and prosperity. I suggest keeping your books in sealed plastic, which may become valuable. E-readers have revolutionized how we access and consume written content. Devices like the Kindle, Nook, and Kobo offer readers a portable library at their fingertips. With the ability to store thousands of books in a single device, e-readers cater to the modern reader’s mobility, convenience, and variety needs. However, they do not provide the exact immersive experience. E-ink technology simulates a paper-like feel, and with its lightweight and compact design, e-readers are perfect for on-the-go reading. And their long battery life makes them suitable for quick trips to the cabin. Features like adjustable font sizes, backlighting, and text-to-speech enhance accessibility for a broader audience, allowing all readers to access a vast array of books and publications. The rise of digital reading has also significantly impacted writing. It has changed how authors create and distribute their work. Independent authors can now self-publish and reach global audiences, allowing diverse voices to be heard. They can maintain creative control and receive a larger share of royalties. Writers can engage directly with their audience through social media and digital platforms, fostering a more interactive marketing strategy. For now, the coexistence of traditional books and e-readers reflects a broader trend in the media landscape, where digital and analog formats complement rather than replace one another. However, this ongoing battle will likely grow and change as the world gains more access to digital services and the need for sustainability rises to the forefront of global discussion. Global warming will take a back seat in the next few years, so it is unlikely that there will be an enormous shift in the reading world. Whether one prefers the classic charm of a hardcover or the sleek efficiency of an e-reader, the battle rages on, and no one knows for sure. Regardless, the love for reading and writing continues to thrive. Books and e-readers do not win readers’ hearts; the stories within them do. Image by from Writing has always been her passion and a voice for those who cannot speak. She considers herself fortunate to write every day and says her mantra is, "I drink coffee, write, and I know about people and technology." Her writing is diverse and can be found online on websites like LifeHack, You Have a Calling, Medium, TechCrunch and, She Knows.

Gandey (Giridih): The counting of votes for the 2024 Jharkhand Assembly elections begins on Saturday, with all eyes on the Gandey constituency in Giridih district. A crucial seat in the state, Gandey has witnessed intense competition this year, particularly between Kalpana Soren of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) and Muniya Devi of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The outcome is uncertain, as both parties have invested heavily in the region, with local issues and national politics fueling the electoral battle. In a state-wide election that saw a strong voter turnout of 68.01%, Gandey recorded an impressive 73.36% participation, underscoring the significance of this contest. Voting was conducted from 7 am to 6 pm on Wednesday, marking the end of an intense electoral exercise. Kalpana Soren, the sitting MLA and wife of Chief Minister Hemant Soren, is seeking re-election from Gandey. She has a solid track record, having won the seat in a by-election in May 2024 by a comfortable margin of over 27,000 votes. With strong local support, she remains a formidable contender, despite facing opposition from the BJP. Muniya Devi, a newcomer to mainstream politics, has been fielded by the BJP. Though relatively unknown at the state level, she has local experience, having served as the District Council member and president of the Jamua Council. Her entry into the BJP in 2023 has brought a fresh perspective to the party’s campaign in the region. Representing the Jharkhand Loktantrik Congress Morcha (JLKM), Md Aqueel Akhtar is seen as a lesser-known figure in the Gandey contest. His limited presence on the ground has made him less influential compared to the leading contenders. Bangladeshi Infiltration: One of the key issues dominating the Gandey election is the alleged infiltration of Bangladeshi nationals into the Santhal Pargana region. Hemant Soren has raised concerns about how this issue is affecting the tribal demographic. He has accused the BJP-led central government of not addressing illegal immigration, further politicizing the matter. Corruption Allegations: Corruption has been a major talking point for the BJP, with allegations against the ruling JMM government. The BJP has also criticized JMM's monthly cash transfer scheme, calling it ineffective and a tool for political manipulation, while JMM defends it as essential welfare for the poor. In the 2019 Jharkhand Assembly elections, the seat was won by Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmad of JMM, who defeated BJP’s Jai Prakash Verma by 8,855 votes.Amazon Offering Kindle Unlimited For Just 99p in the UK



A 7-year-old rivalry between tech leaders Elon Musk and Sam Altman over who should run OpenAI and prevent an artificial intelligence "dictatorship" is now heading to a federal judge as Musk seeks to halt the ChatGPT maker's ongoing shift into a for-profit company. Musk, an early OpenAI investor and board member, sued the artificial intelligence company earlier this year alleging it had betrayed its founding aims as a nonprofit research lab benefiting the public good rather than pursuing profits. Musk has since escalated the dispute, adding new claims and asking for a court order that would stop OpenAI’s plans to convert itself into a for-profit business more fully. The world's richest man, whose companies include Tesla, SpaceX and social media platform X, last year started his own rival AI company, xAI. Musk says it faces unfair competition from OpenAI and its close business partner Microsoft, which has supplied the huge computing resources needed to build AI systems such as ChatGPT. “OpenAI and Microsoft together exploiting Musk’s donations so they can build a for-profit monopoly, one now specifically targeting xAI, is just too much,” says Musk's filing that alleges the companies are violating the terms of Musk’s foundational contributions to the charity. OpenAI filed a response Friday opposing Musk’s requested order, saying it would “debilitate OpenAI’s business” and mission to the advantage of Musk and his own AI company and is based on “far-fetched” legal claims. A hearing is set for January before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California. At the heart of the dispute is a 2017 internal power struggle at the fledgling startup that led to Altman becoming OpenAI's CEO. Musk also sought to be CEO and in an email outlined a plan where he would “unequivocally have initial control of the company” but said that would be temporary. He grew frustrated after two other OpenAI co-founders said he would hold too much power as a major shareholder and chief executive if the startup succeeded in its goal to achieve better-than-human AI known as artificial general intelligence , or AGI. Musk has long voiced concerns about how advanced forms of AI could threaten humanity. “The current structure provides you with a path where you end up with unilateral absolute control over the AGI," said a 2017 email to Musk from co-founders Ilya Sutskever and Greg Brockman. “You stated that you don't want to control the final AGI, but during this negotiation, you've shown to us that absolute control is extremely important to you.” In the same email, titled “Honest Thoughts,” Sutskever and Brockman also voiced concerns about Altman's desire to be CEO and whether he was motivated by “political goals.” Altman eventually succeeded in becoming CEO, and has remained so except for a period last year when he was fired and then reinstated days later after the board that ousted him was replaced. OpenAI published the messages Friday in a blog post meant to show its side of the story, particularly Musk's early support for the idea of making OpenAI a for-profit business so it could raise money for the hardware and computer power that AI needs. It was Musk, through his wealth manager Jared Birchall, who first registered “Open Artificial Intelligence Technologies, Inc.,” a public benefit corporation, in September 2017. Then came the “Honest Thoughts” email that Musk described as the “final straw.” “Either go do something on your own or continue with OpenAI as a nonprofit,” Musk wrote back. OpenAI said Musk later proposed merging the startup into Tesla before resigning as the co-chair of OpenAI's board in early 2018. Musk didn't respond to emailed requests for comment sent to his companies Friday. Asked about his frayed relationship with Musk at a New York Times conference last week, Altman said he felt “tremendously sad” but also characterized Musk’s legal fight as one about business competition. “He’s a competitor and we’re doing well,” Altman said. He also said at the conference that he is “not that worried” about the Tesla CEO’s influence with President-elect Donald Trump. OpenAI said Friday that Altman plans to make a $1 million personal donation to Trump’s inauguration fund, joining a number of tech companies and executives who are working to improve their relationships with the incoming administration. —————————— The Associated Press and OpenAI have a licensing and technology agreement allowing OpenAI access to part of the AP’s text archives. This story has been updated to correct the name of the company registered in 2017. It was Open Artificial Intelligence Technologies, Inc., not Open Artificial Technologies Technologies, Inc.NoneThe left loves to virtue signal and pretend that they are the party of tolerance and compassion, but all you ever need to do is give them a little rope and they will run with it to show you who they truly are. After 1,200 Jews were murdered and hundreds more taken hostage by terrorists in the pogrom of Oct. 7, it took mere days for the left to let their antisemitism shine. Whether they were tearing down posters of hostages or finding Jewish students at American colleges to terrorize , it became pretty clear that far too many on the left in America sympathized and sided with Hamas. More recently, we have seen the left lionize the deranged assassin Luigi Mangione, swooning over him after he killed United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson in cold blood. One of the leading 'progressive' publications even said that such political violence is 'normal' and that we should get used to it . Given this context, it comes as no surprise that the left is embracing assassination as a political weapon and we're starting to see it on display in some of the most 'liberal' places in America. This week in Seattle, a roadside construction sign displayed a horrific message both celebrating Mangione's actions and threatening other American CEOs. BREAKING: An electronic traffic sign in Seattle, Washington, was programmed to display the text “ONE LESS CEO, MANY MORE TO GO.” It is still unknown who is responsible for programming the sign. pic.twitter.com/r82Fjv4YaC The Seattle Department of Transportation denied that this sign was operated by the city government. It appears it was operated by a private contractor . The electronic message board was being used by construction and development company 601 Holdings LLC while it builds a hotel and apartment building nearby, The Seattle Times reported. William Choi, a spokesperson for the developer, said they rented the message board from National Barricade, which programs the displayed messages. A person who answered the phone at National Barricade said they didn't know anything about the message when contacted by The Seattle Times. Choi said that the sign's message can be changed using a keyboard, which is locked and requires a password to access. He added that no one at 601 Holdings LLC knows the code to operate the keyboard. 'We are appalled at the message and had no part in changing the display,' Choi told The Seattle Times . 'We're not political.' Meanwhile, in New York City, a different type of threat is unfolding. Instead of tearing down hostage posters, this time the left is putting posters up. Wanted posters. Wanted posters of healthcare CEOs are reportedly starting to pop up in NYC, per Reddit: pic.twitter.com/YH1K4nSEnD From Fox5 New York : The posters, which have drawn significant attention, were highlighted in a TikTok video posted Tuesday. They name various health care industry executives and include statements like 'Denying medical care for corporate profit' and 'Healthcare CEOs should not feel safe,' printed in bold capital letters alongside their pictures. The NYPD says they're aware of the posters and advised companies to increase security measures for their executives. 'We are aware of the posters and are investigating these incidents,' a spokesperson from the NYPD’s Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Public Information, told FOX Business. Yeah, we're sure that the police in Seattle and New York are going to get to the bottom of this right away. [Sarcasm font] This kind of garbage has happened before in Seattle. They won’t do anything about it. The same city where the hostage posters were routinely torn down. And still are. https://t.co/AtAXOrxOcX Whoever is responsible for these vile messages, one thing we have learned from the left's antisemitic demonstrations after Oct. 7 is that these efforts are generally organized and funded. It's highly unlikely that these signs and posters are the result of 'lone wolves,' though that is possible. Someone is behind this. We need to expose whoever it is. Who is funding the bounties? Pull this thread. And if there was any doubt that these types of messages are being glorified by an increasing number of leftists, all you have to do is look at some of the truly vile responses on Twitter to the tweets above from Libs of TikTok and Unusual Whales. The reputations of insurance companies and their CEOs, generally speaking, not good, at all. There is a rebellion underway. What will be the response, not legally, but ethically and morally? https://t.co/bLepG54RFa We know what the response to this person should be. An FBI investigation. It got much worse from other, more anonymous accounts. Anyone have printable copies? 🖤 #AbolishTheCEOs https://t.co/GPP20iWYwI Love it. Hope it expands https://t.co/usahmia5Qh See I’m okay with this https://t.co/UfQa5uGMF8 Eat the rich pic.twitter.com/J4HTFdISye Healthcare CEOs have killed so many people. People are angry. Rightly so. It’s a call for systemic change, not violence. Yikes. No, Peter Lombard. It is an explicit call for violence. And you know it. Not only do you know it, you cheer it on. If there were comments like these on Twitter, we can't imagine what kind of violence was being advocated over on BlueSky. Frankly, we almost don't want to know (even though we probably should). Thankfully, sanity is still the dominant mindset on Twitter and most people were calling out the left for showing everyone who they are. This is insane and this doesn’t end well. https://t.co/KyrK0OhiYt The FBI may have had a point when it announced domestic terrorism as one of our biggest threats. They just got the party wrong. They blamed people silently praying outside of abortion clinics instead of people openly calling for murder. Disgusting https://t.co/O6aWCUP9ac Democrats truly are sick people. https://t.co/jcz5DXj8ub It is tempting to offer the qualification 'Not all Democrats,' but we can't really do that until we see some of them speaking out against this. Instead, we get AOC and Elizabeth Warren saying horrific things like, 'Violence is not the answer, BUT ...' The "tolerant, loving" left... https://t.co/mBPRcbwOXu The left gets more violent and revolting by the day. It’s not ok to kill or hurt people because you don’t like their jobs or politics!! Brownshirts are how the Nazis got started and it really feels like the left is heading down the same ugly path. This is encouraging anarcho-terrorist activity. It sounds a lot like one of AOC's favorite phrases: 'Stochastic terrorism.' Because the left loves projection. Scum. Not the ceos, but the people posting these and perpetuating violence Blue cities are woke cesspools No argument here. These people are morally bankrupt. https://t.co/QsLe7PFGfw No argument against that either. The peace loving left never fail to call for violence. Yep. It's just what they do. Of course, many on Twitter also claimed that these acts were just a 'psyop.' Because Twitter loves to call everything a psyop. But when you have the media excusing assassins and Democrat politicians justifying political violence, is it any surprise that leftists would feel emboldened in their actions to call for more violence? Sure, it could be a psyop. But we think Occam's Razor is far more likely. The left is doing this because they are being encouraged to do it. This is who they are.

Eagles seek 7th straight win while Rams try to keep pace in crowded NFC West raceJimmy Carter Passes Away With One Final Parting Gift for Trump

S outh Africa finished their 2024 campaign as they started it: with victory over Wales. This was the most expected of successes against Wales, whose staggering sequence of losses continued in Cardiff. The home side have developed into a team of inveterate losers; it’s easy to look at the Springboks in a diametrically opposed light. Easy, but inaccurate. For all the success of the Springboks under Rassie Erasmus, including two World Cups (one as director of rugby but never anything but the main man) and the 2024 Rugby Championship, they don’t have the winning runs that the All Blacks and England under Eddie Jones clocked up this century. Victory at the Principality was about the result, not the performance, although they were brutally brilliant in the first 20 minutes when the game was in effect taken away from Wales. Here we saw a glimpse of where this team are going. The speed of ruck enabled both second-rows, Franco Mostert and Eben Etzebeth, to blast through retreating Welsh defence for glorious tries.

'Let's not panic': Canada picks up the pieces after ugly Latvia loss at world juniorsKyiv claims ‘crazy’ Russia fired nuke-capable missileLeading CEOs from the tech industry are reportedly courting favor with President-elect Donald Trump , indicating a significant change in corporate America’s approach towards his upcoming term. What Happened : High-profile business leaders have been visiting Trump at his Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago, marking a stark contrast to the reception he received following his 2016 election victory. Among the attendees were Amazon’s Jeff Bezos , Apple’s Tim Cook , Google’s Sundar Pichai , and TikTok’s CEO Shou Zi Chew . Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg had a meeting with Trump last month. Trump, who secured his election victory with 49.8 percent of the vote, shared his enthusiasm on Truth Social, saying that “EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE MY FRIEND!!!” He also observed a marked shift in attitude compared to his first term, noting that there seems to be a greater willingness to cooperate this time around. Former Microsoft CEO Bill Gates is also said to have requested a visit. Also Read: Why Trump Wants Debt Ceiling Killed Before He Takes Office In a post on Truth Social on Friday, Trump said that Gates had asked to come to Mar-a-Lago. The 78-year-old Republican encouraged him to visit. "Where are you? When are you coming to the ‘Center of the Universe,' Mar-a-Lago. Bill Gates asked to come, tonight. We miss you and x! New Year's Eve is going to be AMAZING!!!" Trump wrote. He signed it "DJT." Why It Matters : This change in corporate America’s stance towards Trump could be motivated by a desire for influence or a fear of potential backlash. Major corporations such as Amazon, Meta, OpenAI, and Perplexity have pledged to donate $1 million each to Trump’s inaugural fund. This shift underlines the importance of political engagement for these tech giants, who are likely seeking to ensure their interests are represented in the upcoming administration. Read Next Here's How Ray Dalio Thinks Trump's Second Term Could Reshape the US and the World This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Virginia reacts to death of former President Jimmy Carter

The Sterling Group Names Two New PartnersTake Profits In WM Technology (Rating Downgrade)

The AP Top 25 men’s college basketball poll is back every week throughout the season! Get the poll delivered straight to your inbox with AP Top 25 Poll Alerts. Sign up here . ATLANTA (AP) — Ahmad Robinson scored 21 points as Mercer beat Georgia State 71-68 on Saturday. Robinson had nine rebounds, 10 assists, and three steals for the Bears (7-6). Tyler Johnson went 7 of 15 from the field (3 for 10 from 3-point range) to add 19 points. Cam Bryant shot 4 for 7, including 3 for 6 from beyond the arc to finish with 11 points. The Bears outscored the Panthers 10-4 over the final 4 1/2 minutes. The Panthers (4-9) were led in scoring by Cesare Edwards, who finished with 20 points and two steals. Georgia State also got 14 points from Malachi Brown. Zarigue Nutter also put up 14 points and four assists. The Panthers prolonged their losing streak to six straight. ___ The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .

What medical experts think of RFK Jr.’s health department nominationThe Sterling Group Names Two New Partners

jollibee 6 pcs www jilibet.com

Copyright © 2015 jilibet slots All Rights Reserved.