ph365 casino app ph365
ph365 casino app ph365
Abpro Holdings Celebrates Closing of Business Combination with Nasdaq Bell RingingSEOUL, South Korea (AP) — The president of South Korea early Wednesday lifted the martial law he imposed on the country hours earlier, bending to political pressure after a tense night in which troops surrounded parliament and lawmakers voted to reject military rule. President Yoon Suk Yeol, who appeared likely to be impeached over his actions, imposed martial law late Tuesday out of frustration with the opposition, vowing to eliminate “anti-state” forces as he struggles against opponents who control parliament and that he accuses of sympathizing with communist North Korea. Police and military personnel were seen leaving the grounds of parliament following the bipartisan vote to overrule the president, and the declaration was formally lifted around 4:30 a.m. during a Cabinet meeting. Parliament acted swiftly after martial law was imposed, with National Assembly Speaker Woo Won Shik declaring that the law was “invalid” and that lawmakers would “protect democracy with the people.” In all, martial law was in effect for about six hours. The president’s surprising move harkened back to an era of authoritarian leaders that the country has not seen since the 1980s, and it was immediately denounced by the opposition and the leader of Yoon’s own conservative party. Lee Jae-myung , leader of the liberal Democratic Party, which holds the majority in the 300-seat parliament, said the party’s lawmakers would remain in the Assembly’s main hall until Yoon formally lifted his order. Woo applauded how troops quickly left the Assembly after the vote. “Even with our unfortunate memories of military coups, our citizens have surely observed the events of today and saw the maturity of our military,” Woo said. While announcing his plan to lift martial law, Yoon continued to criticize parliament’s attempts to impeach key government officials and senior prosecutors. He said lawmakers had engaged in “unscrupulous acts of legislative and budgetary manipulation that are paralyzing the functions of the state.” Jo Seung-lae, a Democratic lawmaker, claimed that security camera footage following Yoon’s declaration showed that troops moved in a way that suggested they were trying to arrest Lee, Woo and even Han Dong-hoon, the leader of Yoon’s People Power Party. Officials from Yoon’s office and the Defense Ministry did not respond to requests for comment early Wednesday. Seemingly hundreds of protesters gathered in front of the Assembly, waving banners and calling for Yoon’s impeachment. Some protesters scuffled with troops ahead of the lawmakers’ vote, but there were no immediate reports of injuries or major property damage. At least one window was broken as troops attempted to enter the Assembly building. One woman tried unsuccessfully to pull a rifle away from one of the soldiers, while shouting “Aren’t you embarrassed?” Under South Korea’s constitution, the president can declare martial law during “wartime, war-like situations or other comparable national emergency states” that require the use of military force to maintain peace and order. It was questionable whether South Korea is currently in such a state. When martial law is declared, “special measures” can be employed to restrict freedom of press, freedom of assembly and other rights, as well as the power of courts. The constitution also states that the president must oblige when the National Assembly demands the lifting of martial law with a majority vote. Following Yoon’s announcement of martial law, South Korea’s military proclaimed that parliament and other political gatherings that could cause “social confusion” would be suspended, South Korea’s Yonhap news agency said. The military said anyone who violated the decree could be arrested without a warrant. In Washington, the White House said the U.S. was “seriously concerned” by the events in Seoul. A spokesperson for the National Security Council said President Joe Biden’s administration was not notified in advance of the martial law announcement and was in contact with the South Korean government. Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said there was no effect on the more than 27,000 U.S. service members based in South Korea. The South Korean military also said that the country’s striking doctors should return to work within 48 hours, Yonhap said. Thousands of doctors have been striking for months over government plans to expand the number of students at medical schools. Soon after martial law was declared, the parliament speaker called on his YouTube channel for all lawmakers to gather at the National Assembly. He urged military and law enforcement personnel to “remain calm and hold their positions. All 190 lawmakers who participated in the vote supported the lifting of martial law. At one point, television footage showed police officers blocking the entrance of the National Assembly and helmeted soldiers carrying rifles in front of the building. An Associated Press photographer saw at least three helicopters, likely from the military, that landed inside the Assembly grounds, while two or three helicopters circled above the site. The leader of Yoon’s conservative party called the decision to impose martial law “wrong.” Lee, who narrowly lost to Yoon in the 2022 presidential election, said Yoon’s announcement was “illegal and unconstitutional.” Yoon said during a televised speech that martial law would help “rebuild and protect” the country from “falling into the depths of national ruin.” He said he would “eradicate pro-North Korean forces and protect the constitutional democratic order.” “I will eliminate anti-state forces as quickly as possible and normalize the country,” he said, while asking the people to believe in him and tolerate “some inconveniences.” Yoon — whose approval rating dipped in recent months — has struggled to push his agenda against an opposition-controlled parliament since taking office in 2022. His party has been locked in an impasse with the liberal opposition over next year’s budget bill. The opposition has also attempted to impeach three top prosecutors, including the chief of the central Seoul prosecutors’ office, in what the conservatives have called a vendetta against their criminal investigations of Lee, who has been seen as the favorite for the next presidential election in 2027 in opinion polls. During his televised announcement, Yoon also described the opposition as “shameless pro-North Korean anti-state forces who are plundering the freedom and happiness of our citizens.” He did not elaborate. Yoon has taken a hard line on North Korea over its nuclear ambitions, departing from the policies of his liberal predecessor, Moon Jae-in, who pursued inter-Korean engagement. Yoon has also dismissed calls for independent investigations into scandals involving his wife and top officials, drawing quick, strong rebukes from his political rivals. Yoon’s move was the first declaration of martial law since the country’s democratization in 1987. The country’s last previous martial law was in October 1979, following the assassination of former military dictator Park Chung-hee. Sydney Seiler, Korean chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, argued that the move was symbolic for Yoon to express his frustration with the opposition-controlled parliament. “He has nothing to lose,” said Seiler, comparing Yoon’s move to the Hail Mary pass in American football, with a slim chance of success. Now Yoon faces likely impeachment, a scenario that was also possible before he made the bold move, Seiler said. Natalia Slavney, research analyst at the Stimson Center’s 38 North website that focuses on Korean affairs, said Yoon’s imposition of martial law was “a serious backslide of democracy" that followed a “worrying trend of abuse” since he took office in 2022. South Korea “has a robust history of political pluralism and is no stranger to mass protests and swift impeachments,” Slavney said, citing the example of former President Park Geun-hye, the country’s first female president, who was ousted from office and imprisoned for bribery and other crimes in 2017 . Associated Press writers Hyung-jin Kim in Seoul, South Korea, and Matt Lee, Didi Tang and Tara Copp in Washington contributed to this report.
Valladolid loses again and Getafe ends winless run in La Liga
Arkansas WR Andrew Armstrong declares for NFL draft, skipping bowlShiffrin confirms she'll miss Beaver Creek World Cup racesThe hits keep coming for Justin Baldoni, as it’s been revealed that the disgraced actor’s own publicist couldn’t “stand” him and found him to be “unlikable,” even as she still allegedly agreed to help him wage a “smear campaign” against his co-star Blake Lively. The Daily Beast reported Wednesday that publicist Jennifer Abel’s apparent animosity towards Baldoni was revealed in text messages she exchanged with colleagues as she prepared to help him boost his public image and his work on the film, “It Ends With Us,” according to a new lawsuit filed against Baldoni and the publicist. Baldoni directed the dramatic film about domestic violence, based on Colleen Hoover’s best-selling novel, and starred as an attractive doctor who becomes abusive to his wife, played by Blake Lively. “I can’t stand (Baldoni),” Abel allegedly wrote in a Jan. 14, 2024, text message, the Daily Beast reported. “He’s so pompous.” In another message sent on the same day, Abel also wrote: “He needs to be humbled. When this movie flops, he’s going to try to blame every person around him for it.” “He may fire us because even if we put together an amazing campaign, it’s not going to change the fact that he’s so unlikable and unrealistic as a leading man,” Abel allegedly wrote in yet another text message, according to the Daily Beast. Abel is being sued by her former boss, Hollywood power publicist Stephanie Jones, for breach of contract and defamation, according to the Daily Beast and other outlets . The CEO alleged in the lawsuit filed Tuesday that Baldoni originally hired her PR company, Joneswork, to represent him, with Abel assigned to be the company’s point person for Baldoni and his studio, Wayfarer. Jones said that Baldoni signed a one-year contract with Joneswork for $25,000 a month, The Hollywood Reporter said . But in August, just as “It Ends With Us” was released theatrically, Baldoni dropped Jones’ firm and followed Abel to her newly launched PR firm. Jones alleges that she fired Abel after learning that Abel had been stealing documents from her firm as she prepared to start her own business, the New York Times also reported . When Abel left the company, she handed over her phone, which allowed Jones and her legal team to uncover a trove of messages that revealed that Abel had been working with Melissa Nathan, a crisis communications manager, on a retaliation campaign against Lively to boost Baldoni’s image, according to the Times and the Daily Beast. Jones’ lawsuit alleges that Abel and Nathan “secretly coordinated with Baldoni and Wayfarer to implement an aggressive media smear campaign” against Lively behind Jones’ back. Jones’ lawsuit was filed three days after Lively filed her own blockbuster complaint against Baldoni, alleging sexual harassment on the set of the film. In her complaint, filed with the California Civil Rights Department, Lively also alleged that Baldoni, Wayfarer and their public relationships representatives — Abel and Nathan — engaged in a “social manipulation” campaign to “destroy” her reputation, as The Hollywood Reporter explained. With the release of “It Ends With Us,” Baldoni allegedly feared that Lively’s allegations about his on-set behavior would be revealed, according to the New York Times. In response, Abel and Nathan began “to formulate a no-holds-barred strategy to discredit and suppress any potential revelations about Baldoni’s on-set behavior” to boost the actor’s profile. But even as Abel and Nathan sought to glorify Baldoni, Abel privately showed her disdain for him, according to the Daily Beast. Jones alleges that Abel and Nathan were motivated to carry out the alleged smear campaign by “avarice” and not because of “any sincere appreciation for Baldoni.” In the text exchange in which Abel called Baldoni “pompous,” she also complained that the actor wanted to go off on a “men’s retreat” over the summer, just as the film was being released. Over the past few years, Baldoni has built a personal brand around positioning himself as a #MeToo ally, who writes and speaks about the harm caused by toxic masculinity and men’s failure to embrace their vulnerability. In another series of text messages exchanged between Abel and an anonymous person on Jan. 13, 2024, the publicist described a kissing scene between Baldwin and Lively in the film as “so cringey,” the Daily Beast reported. When the recipient replied by saying, “Blake was probably grossed out too,” Abel allegedly responded: “Yeah and filed a cease and desist.” Related Articles Entertainment | ‘Morrison Hotel’ made famous by The Doors goes up in flames in LA Entertainment | Judge says woman accusing Jay-Z, Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs of raping her at age 13 can proceed anonymously Entertainment | ‘Baby Driver’ actor Hudson Meek dead at 16 Entertainment | Britney Spears spends Christmas with estranged son Jayden Entertainment | Hwang Dong-hyuk on killing off his ‘Squid Game’ characters and wanting to work with Jake Gyllenhaal Abel appears to be referring to the sexual harassment allegations Lively raised against Baldoni. In her complaint, Lively said she detailed her concerns about Baldoni during an “all-hands” meeting with him and producers in early January 2024. With her husband, Ryan Reynolds, also present, Lively alleged that Baldoni improvised unwanted kissing and intimate touching while filming scenes. She also claimed that he discussed his own sex life and porn addiction and that both he and Heath repeatedly entered her makeup trailer uninvited while she was undressed, including when she was breastfeeding. The Daily Beast said that Abel’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Jones’ lawsuit. Earlier in the week, Freedman categorically denied the allegations in Lively’s suit, writing in a statement that the suit is “completely false, outrageous, and intentionally salacious.” He also described it as “yet another desperate attempt to ‘fix’ (Lively’s) negative reputation which was garnered from her own remarks and actions during the campaign for the film.” Since news of Lively’s allegations against Baldoni broke over the weekend, the “Jane the Virgin” alum has faced cascading consequences, according to the New York Times. The powerhouse talent agency, William Morris Endeavor, dropped him as a client, while author Hoover and “It Ends With Us” cast members Jenny Slate and Brandon Sklenar voiced public support for Lively. Earlier this week, Liz Plank, who has co-hosted the “Man Enough” podcast with Baldoni and Heath, announced she would no longer be appearing on the show. Moreover, Vital Voices, a nonprofit dedicated to empowering women, rescinded an “ally” award it had presented to Baldoni earlier this month for “advocating on behalf of women and girls.”
Memphis says it won’t agree to federal oversight of police department ahead of investigation report
Tech Giant at a Crossroads. Can Nvidia Navigate Global Challenges?
Liverpool boss Arne Slot hailed “special” Mohamed Salah after seeing him fire the Premier League leaders to the brink of victory at Newcastle. The Reds ultimately left St James’ Park with only a point after Fabian Schar snatched a 3-3 draw at the end of a pulsating encounter, but Salah’s double – his 14th and 15th goals of the season – transformed a 2-1 deficit into a 3-2 lead before the Switzerland defender’s late intervention. The 32-year-old Egypt international’s future at Anfield remains a topic of debate with his current contract running down. Asked about Salah’s future, Slot said: “It’s difficult for me to predict the long-term future, but the only thing I can expect or predict is that he is in a very good place at the moment. Two goals and an assist for Mo tonight 👏 pic.twitter.com/tMXidgeA0P — Liverpool FC (@LFC) December 4, 2024 “He plays in a very good team that provides him with good opportunities and then he is able to do special things. “And what makes him for me even more special is that in the first hour or before we scored to make it 1-1, you thought, ‘He’s not playing his best game today’, and to then come up with a half-hour or 45 minutes – I don’t know how long it was – afterwards with an assist, two goals, having a shot on the bar, being a constant threat, that is something not many players can do if they’ve played the first hour like he did. “That is also what makes him special. If you just look at the goals, his finish is so clinical. He’s a special player, but that’s what we all know.” Salah did indeed endure a quiet opening 45 minutes by his standards and it was the Magpies who went in at the break a goal to the good after Alexander Isak’s stunning 35th-minute finish. Slot said: “The shot from Isak, I don’t even know if Caoimh (keeper Caoimhin Kelleher) saw that ball, as hard as it was.” Salah set up Curtis Jones to level five minutes into the second half and after Anthony Gordon has restored the hosts’ lead, levelled himself from substitute Trent Alexander-Arnold’s 68th-minute cross. He looked to have won it with a fine turn and finish – his ninth goal in seven league games – seven minutes from time, only for Schar to pounce from a tight angle in the 90th minute. Newcastle head coach Eddie Howe was delighted with the way his team took the game to the Reds four days after their disappointing 1-1 draw at Crystal Palace. Howe, who admitted his surprise that VAR official Stuart Attwell had not taken a dimmer view of a Virgil van Dijk shoulder barge on Gordon, said: “It’s mixed emotions. “Part of me feels we should have won it – a big part of me – but part of me is pleased we didn’t lose either because it was such a late goal for us. “Generally, I’m just pleased with the performance. There was much more attacking output, a much better feel about the team. “There was much better energy, and it was a really good performance against, for me, the best team we’ve played so far this season in the Premier League, so it was a big jump forward for us.”How to Quit Smoking For Good, According to Behavioral Therapists and Addiction ExpertsCroatia’s incumbent president wins most votes at polls but still faces runoffThere's nothing quite like slipping into a freshly dry-cleaned outfit — crisp, pristine and ready to conquer the day. But have you ever wondered about the process behind these immaculate results? Dryel At-Home Dry Cleaner Kit OGHom Steamer for Clothes, Handheld Clothing Steamer SALAV® Heavy Duty Commercial Full-Size Garment Steamer Woolite Extra Delicates Laundry Detergent Dirty Labs | Hand Wash and Delicates | Scent Free | 32 Loads Heritage Park Silk & Wool Fragrance Free Laundry Detergent Minky Homecare Outdoor Retractable Dual Clothesline Household Essentials Single Line Retractable Clothesline Whitmor 6026-2884 ClotheClothes Pins, S/50, Natural Wood, 50 40 Pack Clothes Pins Heavy Duty Amazon Basics Foldable Portable Laundry Drying Rack Honey-Can-Do Heavy Duty Gullwing Drying Rack, White Metal Despite its name, dry-cleaning isn't dry. Instead of water, your garments are bathed in a liquid solvent, typically perchloroethylene (PCE) — commonly known as PERC — that adeptly dissolves oil and grease without harming the fabric. Stains are pretreated with specialized agents before the clothes are submerged in PERC and gently agitated to remove dirt. Modern dry-cleaning machines operate in a closed-loop system, recovering nearly all the solvent to minimize environmental impact and reduce costs. After cleaning, any remaining stains are addressed, and the garments are pressed and given final touches. While effective, PERC and another closely related industrial solvent — trichloroethylene (TCE) — have been identified as potential health hazards. In response to these findings, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has taken significant steps to , which have been staples in the dry-cleaning industry for years. Dr. Paul Savage, founder and CEO at and a toxin expert, emphasizes the significance of this regulatory action, "The EPA's decision to ban TCE and PCE solvents is a watershed moment in public health policy. These carcinogenic chemicals, widely used in dry-cleaning and industrial applications, have been linked to cancers such as kidney, liver and testicular cancers, as well as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma," he explains. These risks are present, even at very low exposure levels. Furthermore, their widespread presence in the environment contaminates water, soil, air and even food, underscoring the urgent need for decisive action. , associate professor at Texas Christian University, explains, " have linked long-term exposure to increased cancer risks among dry-cleaning workers and nearby communities. Communities near dry-cleaning facilities using PERC have reported higher rates of cancer, prompting EPA action under the ." This regulatory crackdown has prompted a reevaluation of garment care routines. As the phaseout of these chemicals progresses over the next decade, the industry is expected to adopt safer, more sustainable alternatives. But in the meantime, what steps should you take to safeguard your health? Let's uncover the truth about what lingers in your clothes, explore how these changes impact your wardrobe and wellness and consider safer alternatives to dry-cleaning. PERC and TCE have long been integral to the dry-cleaning industry, thanks to their potent grease-busting properties. PCE has been the predominant solvent in dry-cleaning, prized for its chemical stability and nonflammable nature, which allow it to remove stains without damaging delicate fabrics. While TCE is less commonly used in dry-cleaning, it plays a significant role in industrial applications such as metal degreasing and as an ingredient in various cleaning products. However, exposure to PERC and TCE pose significant health risks: : Both chemicals are classified as probable human carcinogens. PCE exposure has been linked to cancers of the liver, kidney, brain and testicles, while TCE exposure is associated with . : Short-term exposure to high levels of these solvents can lead to dizziness, headaches and cognitive impairments. Chronic exposure may result in long-term neurological damage. : that PCE and TCE may adversely affect reproductive health and compromise immune system function. The health consequences are not the only concerns. The environmental persistence of PERC and TCE also presents dangers. Improper disposal and leaks can lead to soil and groundwater contamination, posing risks to ecosystems. Furthermore, the volatilization of these chemicals contributes to air quality degradation, affecting both indoor and outdoor environments. The EPA's ban will reduce the impact of PERC and TCE on several groups, including employees in the dry-cleaning sector who are regularly exposed to high levels of these chemicals and residents living near dry-cleaning businesses. As Galbadage notes, " PERC emissions contaminate indoor air and groundwater, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations living near dry-cleaning facilities. Phasing out PERC addresses these health inequities." Around are employed in the laundry and dry-cleaning industry in the U.S. These individuals can inhale toxic fumes, leading to delirium, severe respiratory issues and death, while chronic low-level exposure significantly increases cancer and other health risks. But what about consumers? Studies assessing PERC and TCE levels in dry-cleaned fabrics are few and far between. However, found that wool, polyester and cotton fabrics retained significant amounts of PCE after dry-cleaning, with levels increasing after multiple cleaning cycles. In contrast, silk fabrics didn't retain noticeable amounts. Furthermore, PCE slowly evaporated from the fabrics when exposed to normal room air conditions, indicating that the chemical lingers in clothing and is potentially released into the environment over time. The amount of PCE residue varied between different dry-cleaning establishments, suggesting that cleaning processes and equipment efficiency can influence chemical retention in fabrics. So, even though dry-cleaned clothes are considered “safe” to wear, the chemicals may still pose some risks, especially to those with sensitive skin or those who regularly dry-clean their clothes, leading to greater buildup. The controversy surrounding PERC and TCE isn't new. In the absence of federal regulations, some states have taken action. For example, California began phasing out PERC in dry-cleaning in 2007 after identifying it as a in 1991, with a deadline to stop using PERC in dry-cleaning processes by Jan. 1, 2023. Recognizing these hazards, the EPA has established a 10-year timeline for phasing out PCE in dry- cleaning. The agency has also banned all consumer uses and many commercial applications of TCE, with most prohibitions taking effect within a year. As Savage notes, "It’s encouraging to see the EPA take this step, but it’s important to recognize that the full elimination of PERC may take time. Consumers should proactively seek out eco-friendly cleaning options in the meantime." But why is there such an extended period to eliminate these chemicals? Several factors influence this extended timeline: The dry-cleaning industry predominantly comprises small, family-owned businesses. Immediate compliance with new regulations would require significant investments in alternative solvents and equipment, potentially imposing financial burdens that could jeopardize their operations. Identifying, testing and implementing safer alternatives to PERC and TCE is a complex process. Industries need adequate time to research and adopt practical and economically viable substitutes. Dry-cleaning machines and other industrial equipment represent substantial investments with long operational lifespans. Mandating an abrupt cessation of PERC and TCE use would render existing equipment obsolete, leading to financial losses. Transitioning to new chemicals or processes necessitates comprehensive employee training to ensure safe and effective use. The production and distribution networks for alternative chemicals and equipment need time to scale to meet increased demand. A phased approach ensures supply chains can adjust without causing shortages or delays. The timeline for phasing out PERC and TCE reflects a strategic effort to protect public health while allowing industries sufficient time to adapt. If you'd prefer to avoid traditional dry-cleaning as it transitions away from PERC and TCE, several safer and more sustainable alternatives are available for garment care. Commercial wet cleaning Commercial wet cleaning uses water and biodegradable detergents, making it suitable for delicate fabrics like wool and silk. It's an environmentally friendly method that eliminates the health risks of solvents. Specialized equipment allows for gentle agitation and precise control over variables like temperature and moisture, ensuring thorough cleaning without damaging your clothes. Liquid carbon dioxide cleaning This innovative technique employs pressurized liquid carbon dioxide (CO2) as a solvent. Garments are placed in a specialized machine where CO2 removes dirt and stains. The process is energy-efficient and avoids toxic chemicals. Additionally, the CO2 used is often captured as a by-product of existing industrial processes, further reducing environmental impact. Win win! Handwashing and line-drying Let's go old school and do the washing by hand! For many “dry-clean only” items, gentle handwashing with mild detergent is a safe alternative. After washing, flat drying helps maintain the garment's shape and quality. It's an economical, chemical-free method, but check care labels and test a small area first to ensure the fabric can handle water without damage. Steam cleaning Steam can remove odors and light stains. Handheld steamers or steam functions on irons can refresh garments without full washing. Steam cleaning is gentle on fabrics and reduces the need for chemical cleaners. It's particularly useful for items that wrinkle easily or have been in storage. At-home dry-cleaning kits These kits are a convenient way to freshen garments using your dryer. However, their effectiveness varies, and some may still contain chemicals of concern. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has evaluated products like and is less than impressed with their safety profiles. It's advisable to research specific products and consider their ingredients before use. Attempting to care for delicate “dry-clean-only” garments at home can be a bit daunting — one wrong move, and you could have a shredded silk or shrunken wool disaster on your hands. But with the correct methods, you can keep your wardrobe pristine without risking fabric fiascos. Here are our top picks for safely cleaning dry-clean-only clothing at home. In addition to in-dryer dry- cleaning kits, we've selected our favorite steamers, gentle detergents and accessories for line drying garments, as dry-clean-only fabrics typically shouldn't be thrown in the dryer. This is a convenient solution for refreshing delicate and dry-clean-only garments in 20 minutes. The starter kit includes a stain-removal pen to pretreat stains and eight cleaning cloths. Simply place a cloth in the dryer with one to five garments of similar material and tumble dry on medium heat. The kit also contains a scented wrinkle-releaser spray to remove static and wrinkles between cleanings. It works on most fabrics, including wool, linen, silk and denim. Nearly 500 Amazon reviews have rated this product 4.5 stars out of 5. , "This really works," and "The stain remover is incredibly effective." Another , "I'm beyond amazed. I put a cleaning sheet in with two filthy pairs of linen pants. 20 minutes later, the pants are fresh, clean and wrinkle free. I don't know how these possibly work, but they really really do." However, it's important to note that kits like these still include chemicals, although they're free from banned substances. Other Dryel products have scored poorly in EWG ingredient concern ratings, although not this one specifically. With over 51,000 reviews averaging 4.3 stars out of 5 and costing under $25, the is a solid choice. The 240ml water tank heats up in under 2 minutes and provides up to 15 minutes of continuous steam. Plus, the 9-foot power cord makes it convenient to use. Customers love its compact size, making it suitable for travel. However, note that while effective on light to medium fabrics, it may be less efficient on larger, heavier items. If you're looking for something that can handle heavy-duty cleaning, the is a better choice. This robust appliance has 1,800 watts of steam power and an extra-large 3-liter water tank, providing up to 90 minutes of continuous steam. This detergent is specifically formulated for delicate fabrics, with a hypoallergenic solution free from harsh ingredients like bleach, phosphates or enzymes. Leveraging bioenzyme technology, this detergent cleans delicate fabrics without compromising their quality. It's hyperconcentrated, nontoxic and biodegradable. This pH-neutral, hypoallergenic detergent is free from enzymes, ultraconcentrated and dermatologist-tested, making it a reliable choice for washing delicate garments, particularly silk and wool. Retractable clotheslines are perfect for indoor and outdoor use, providing flexibility and saving space. The is a heavy-duty, PVC-coated line with a massive 98 feet of drying space. If your space is smaller, the has 40 feet of drying space. This is a great addition to laundry rooms or even bedrooms when you need to hang up clothes inside. Clothespins are essential for securing garments to clotheslines, preventing them from falling or being thrown around by the wind. While there are lots of affordable options to choose between, these simple, classic wooden clothespins come in a pack of 50. Wooden clothespins sometimes break with frequent use. These stainless-steel pins are a good alternative (and they're ones that Yahoo Health Editor, Laura Williams, personally uses). Drying racks are versatile tools for flat-drying clothes so they keep their shape. They come in various designs to accommodate different spaces and laundry volumes. This lightweight yet sturdy rack offers ample space for drying clothes and folds flat for easy storage. This rack is ideal for large families and has multiple drying positions and a high capacity. What is PERC, and why is it being banned? "PERC refers to perchloroethylene, a harmful volatile organic compound (VOC) widely used as a solvent in dry-cleaning shops. However, it is also used by consumers as brake cleaners and adhesive products, as well as for many industrial processes," explains , associate specialist in air pollution exposure assessment and epidemiology at the UC Irvine Program in Public Health. It's also worth noting that PERC can degrade into TCE, another cancer-causing solvent. "The EPA's recent move to ban PERC is due to the chemical's casual link with many adverse health conditions including liver, kidney, brain and testicular cancer, as well as damage to the kidney, liver and immune system, neurotoxicity and reproductive toxicity," Masri continues. Is PERC completely banned in dry-cleaning? PERC is not yet banned, explains Masri. In December 2024, the EPA issued a final rule prohibiting many uses of PCE and for those uses that are not prohibited. This includes implementing a Workplace Chemical Protection Program and prescriptive controls to ensure safety in environments where PCE is still in use. Specifically for the dry-cleaning sector, the EPA has set a 10-year withdrawal period to eliminate the risk to individuals who work or spend considerable time at dry-cleaning facilities. "The EPA’s action focuses on phasing out PERC from dry-cleaning, with clear deadlines for industries to adopt safer alternatives. However, some facilities may temporarily continue to use PERC as they transition to modern technologies. The extent of the ban will also depend on enforcement timelines and compliance at the local level," explains Savage. Galbadage notes that using PCE in newly acquired dry-cleaning machines is prohibited after six months from the rule's issuance. Compliance dates for existing machines vary depending on their type, with older machines being phased out sooner than newer ones. Many dry-cleaners have already begun this transition. Therefore, while PCE is not entirely banned in dry-cleaning, its use is being systematically eliminated, with complete prohibition expected within the next decade. What is the EPA doing to enforce the ban? "Effective enforcement is key to the success of this initiative," says Savage. This year has seen the EPA , doubling financial penalties issued to polluters and initiating its first-ever arrest related to a climate change crime. "The EPA is enforcing the ban through stringent regulations, requiring industries to adopt safer alternatives and providing oversight to ensure compliance. They are also working with state and local agencies to monitor progress and implement penalties for noncompliance," Savage adds. Masri also notes that measures include mandatory recordkeeping, reporting and environmental monitoring. For example, chemical manufacturers and processors must maintain detailed records of significant adverse reactions to health or the environment caused by chemical substances. These records must be available for EPA inspection upon request. In 2024, the agency concluded over 1,850 civil cases and charged 121 criminal defendants, reflecting a commitment to reducing pollution and protecting public health. With the addition of 300 new employees, the EPA is now better equipped to enforce regulations concerning PERC and TCE in dry-cleaning and other sectors, ensuring compliance to protect public health and the environment. What can I do to minimize my exposure to PERC? You can significantly reduce your exposure to PERC by adopting these practices: : Opt for dry-cleaners using non-PERC methods, such as wet or liquid carbon dioxide cleaning, suggests Savage. : Galbadage recommends storing dry-cleaned garments in well-ventilated areas to dissipate residual PERC fumes. : Before bringing dry-cleaned items into your home, remove them from plastic bags and air them outdoors, says Savage. Masri adds, "Find out if you live downwind of a nearby dry-cleaning shop and purchase a if so." Look for one with an activated carbon filter. Some models combine these with HEPA filters to also capture particulate matter. Masri advises caution when using certain cleaning solvents, carpet cleaners and adhesives that may contain PCE. Opt for alternatives labeled as PCE-free or those using safer solvents. : Stay up-to-date with EPA guidelines and local regulations regarding PERC use and exposure. Because PCE can contaminate groundwater and drinking water supplies, Masri also recommends testing your water for contamination, especially if you rely on well water or live near industrial areas. Certified laboratories can perform these tests, and local health departments can guide testing procedures. , associate specialist in air pollution exposure assessment and epidemiology at the UC Irvine Program in Public Health Paul Savage, MD, founder and CEO at and a toxin expert , associate professor at Texas Christian University
Tom Werner Shares of cloud-based software provider Toast, Inc. ( NYSE: TOST ) have exploded recently. The company’s footprint in the restaurant industry has allowed it to grow at massive rates in recent years, and while its past growth rates are unsustainable, I If you liked this idea, sign up for a no-obligation free trial of my Seeking Alpha Marketplace service, Timely Trader ! I sift through various asset classes to find the best places for your capital, helping you maximize your returns. Timely Trader seeks to find winners before they become winners, and keep you out of losers. In addition, you get access to our community via chat, direct access to me, real-time price alerts, a model portfolio, and more. Sign up today! Josh Arnold has been covering financial markets for a decade, utilizing a combination of technical and fundamental analysis to identify potential winners early on in their growth cycles. Josh's focus is mainly on growth stocks. His goal is efficient and profitable use of capital, which overly rigid buy-and-hold strategies do not allow. Timely Trader Learn more. Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of TOST either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.Supermarket chain Jumbo has its use of artificial intelligence to detect shoplifting, citing concerns about customer experience and societal impacts. CEO Ton van Veen confirmed the decision, stating, “We tried to use technology to recognize deviant behavioral patterns, but we won’t continue with it.” Jumbo announced at the start of the year that it loses over 100 million euros annually due to shoplifting, a significant blow to the company’s bottom line. “That’s money we can’t pass on to customers in the form of lower prices,” said Van Veen. This year, Jumbo managed to reduce losses from theft by 30 million euros, cutting theft-related losses to 1 percent of total revenue. “We’ve reduced it by a third, but I believe it should be brought down to no more than half a percent of turnover,” Van Veen said. “These savings can then be passed on to our customers.” Jumbo had implemented AI trials to analyze customer behavior and identify potential shoplifters based on deviations in patterns. The experiment included analyzing surveillance footage and conducting targeted random checks at self-checkout counters. Despite these efforts, the initiative failed to meet expectations. “It does not enhance the shopping experience,” Van Veen said. “Customers are not potential thieves. They are absolutely welcome, even if someone forgets to scan an item occasionally. We don’t want to respond to the hardening of society with tougher measures.” Van Veen emphasized the importance of social interaction in combating theft, saying, “Social control and making eye contact with customers are key.” He further ruled out deploying body cameras for employees, a measure implemented by other supermarket chains such as Dirk earlier this year. “Bodycams are not the answer,” he stated. Instead, Jumbo is focusing on traditional security measures, including enhanced surveillance, stricter random checks at self-checkout counters, and increased employee presence on the shop floor. The company has also implemented measures such as issuing fines of 181 euros to shoplifters and frequently imposing store bans.
ph365 casino app ph365
Abpro Holdings Celebrates Closing of Business Combination with Nasdaq Bell RingingSEOUL, South Korea (AP) — The president of South Korea early Wednesday lifted the martial law he imposed on the country hours earlier, bending to political pressure after a tense night in which troops surrounded parliament and lawmakers voted to reject military rule. President Yoon Suk Yeol, who appeared likely to be impeached over his actions, imposed martial law late Tuesday out of frustration with the opposition, vowing to eliminate “anti-state” forces as he struggles against opponents who control parliament and that he accuses of sympathizing with communist North Korea. Police and military personnel were seen leaving the grounds of parliament following the bipartisan vote to overrule the president, and the declaration was formally lifted around 4:30 a.m. during a Cabinet meeting. Parliament acted swiftly after martial law was imposed, with National Assembly Speaker Woo Won Shik declaring that the law was “invalid” and that lawmakers would “protect democracy with the people.” In all, martial law was in effect for about six hours. The president’s surprising move harkened back to an era of authoritarian leaders that the country has not seen since the 1980s, and it was immediately denounced by the opposition and the leader of Yoon’s own conservative party. Lee Jae-myung , leader of the liberal Democratic Party, which holds the majority in the 300-seat parliament, said the party’s lawmakers would remain in the Assembly’s main hall until Yoon formally lifted his order. Woo applauded how troops quickly left the Assembly after the vote. “Even with our unfortunate memories of military coups, our citizens have surely observed the events of today and saw the maturity of our military,” Woo said. While announcing his plan to lift martial law, Yoon continued to criticize parliament’s attempts to impeach key government officials and senior prosecutors. He said lawmakers had engaged in “unscrupulous acts of legislative and budgetary manipulation that are paralyzing the functions of the state.” Jo Seung-lae, a Democratic lawmaker, claimed that security camera footage following Yoon’s declaration showed that troops moved in a way that suggested they were trying to arrest Lee, Woo and even Han Dong-hoon, the leader of Yoon’s People Power Party. Officials from Yoon’s office and the Defense Ministry did not respond to requests for comment early Wednesday. Seemingly hundreds of protesters gathered in front of the Assembly, waving banners and calling for Yoon’s impeachment. Some protesters scuffled with troops ahead of the lawmakers’ vote, but there were no immediate reports of injuries or major property damage. At least one window was broken as troops attempted to enter the Assembly building. One woman tried unsuccessfully to pull a rifle away from one of the soldiers, while shouting “Aren’t you embarrassed?” Under South Korea’s constitution, the president can declare martial law during “wartime, war-like situations or other comparable national emergency states” that require the use of military force to maintain peace and order. It was questionable whether South Korea is currently in such a state. When martial law is declared, “special measures” can be employed to restrict freedom of press, freedom of assembly and other rights, as well as the power of courts. The constitution also states that the president must oblige when the National Assembly demands the lifting of martial law with a majority vote. Following Yoon’s announcement of martial law, South Korea’s military proclaimed that parliament and other political gatherings that could cause “social confusion” would be suspended, South Korea’s Yonhap news agency said. The military said anyone who violated the decree could be arrested without a warrant. In Washington, the White House said the U.S. was “seriously concerned” by the events in Seoul. A spokesperson for the National Security Council said President Joe Biden’s administration was not notified in advance of the martial law announcement and was in contact with the South Korean government. Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said there was no effect on the more than 27,000 U.S. service members based in South Korea. The South Korean military also said that the country’s striking doctors should return to work within 48 hours, Yonhap said. Thousands of doctors have been striking for months over government plans to expand the number of students at medical schools. Soon after martial law was declared, the parliament speaker called on his YouTube channel for all lawmakers to gather at the National Assembly. He urged military and law enforcement personnel to “remain calm and hold their positions. All 190 lawmakers who participated in the vote supported the lifting of martial law. At one point, television footage showed police officers blocking the entrance of the National Assembly and helmeted soldiers carrying rifles in front of the building. An Associated Press photographer saw at least three helicopters, likely from the military, that landed inside the Assembly grounds, while two or three helicopters circled above the site. The leader of Yoon’s conservative party called the decision to impose martial law “wrong.” Lee, who narrowly lost to Yoon in the 2022 presidential election, said Yoon’s announcement was “illegal and unconstitutional.” Yoon said during a televised speech that martial law would help “rebuild and protect” the country from “falling into the depths of national ruin.” He said he would “eradicate pro-North Korean forces and protect the constitutional democratic order.” “I will eliminate anti-state forces as quickly as possible and normalize the country,” he said, while asking the people to believe in him and tolerate “some inconveniences.” Yoon — whose approval rating dipped in recent months — has struggled to push his agenda against an opposition-controlled parliament since taking office in 2022. His party has been locked in an impasse with the liberal opposition over next year’s budget bill. The opposition has also attempted to impeach three top prosecutors, including the chief of the central Seoul prosecutors’ office, in what the conservatives have called a vendetta against their criminal investigations of Lee, who has been seen as the favorite for the next presidential election in 2027 in opinion polls. During his televised announcement, Yoon also described the opposition as “shameless pro-North Korean anti-state forces who are plundering the freedom and happiness of our citizens.” He did not elaborate. Yoon has taken a hard line on North Korea over its nuclear ambitions, departing from the policies of his liberal predecessor, Moon Jae-in, who pursued inter-Korean engagement. Yoon has also dismissed calls for independent investigations into scandals involving his wife and top officials, drawing quick, strong rebukes from his political rivals. Yoon’s move was the first declaration of martial law since the country’s democratization in 1987. The country’s last previous martial law was in October 1979, following the assassination of former military dictator Park Chung-hee. Sydney Seiler, Korean chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, argued that the move was symbolic for Yoon to express his frustration with the opposition-controlled parliament. “He has nothing to lose,” said Seiler, comparing Yoon’s move to the Hail Mary pass in American football, with a slim chance of success. Now Yoon faces likely impeachment, a scenario that was also possible before he made the bold move, Seiler said. Natalia Slavney, research analyst at the Stimson Center’s 38 North website that focuses on Korean affairs, said Yoon’s imposition of martial law was “a serious backslide of democracy" that followed a “worrying trend of abuse” since he took office in 2022. South Korea “has a robust history of political pluralism and is no stranger to mass protests and swift impeachments,” Slavney said, citing the example of former President Park Geun-hye, the country’s first female president, who was ousted from office and imprisoned for bribery and other crimes in 2017 . Associated Press writers Hyung-jin Kim in Seoul, South Korea, and Matt Lee, Didi Tang and Tara Copp in Washington contributed to this report.
Valladolid loses again and Getafe ends winless run in La Liga
Arkansas WR Andrew Armstrong declares for NFL draft, skipping bowlShiffrin confirms she'll miss Beaver Creek World Cup racesThe hits keep coming for Justin Baldoni, as it’s been revealed that the disgraced actor’s own publicist couldn’t “stand” him and found him to be “unlikable,” even as she still allegedly agreed to help him wage a “smear campaign” against his co-star Blake Lively. The Daily Beast reported Wednesday that publicist Jennifer Abel’s apparent animosity towards Baldoni was revealed in text messages she exchanged with colleagues as she prepared to help him boost his public image and his work on the film, “It Ends With Us,” according to a new lawsuit filed against Baldoni and the publicist. Baldoni directed the dramatic film about domestic violence, based on Colleen Hoover’s best-selling novel, and starred as an attractive doctor who becomes abusive to his wife, played by Blake Lively. “I can’t stand (Baldoni),” Abel allegedly wrote in a Jan. 14, 2024, text message, the Daily Beast reported. “He’s so pompous.” In another message sent on the same day, Abel also wrote: “He needs to be humbled. When this movie flops, he’s going to try to blame every person around him for it.” “He may fire us because even if we put together an amazing campaign, it’s not going to change the fact that he’s so unlikable and unrealistic as a leading man,” Abel allegedly wrote in yet another text message, according to the Daily Beast. Abel is being sued by her former boss, Hollywood power publicist Stephanie Jones, for breach of contract and defamation, according to the Daily Beast and other outlets . The CEO alleged in the lawsuit filed Tuesday that Baldoni originally hired her PR company, Joneswork, to represent him, with Abel assigned to be the company’s point person for Baldoni and his studio, Wayfarer. Jones said that Baldoni signed a one-year contract with Joneswork for $25,000 a month, The Hollywood Reporter said . But in August, just as “It Ends With Us” was released theatrically, Baldoni dropped Jones’ firm and followed Abel to her newly launched PR firm. Jones alleges that she fired Abel after learning that Abel had been stealing documents from her firm as she prepared to start her own business, the New York Times also reported . When Abel left the company, she handed over her phone, which allowed Jones and her legal team to uncover a trove of messages that revealed that Abel had been working with Melissa Nathan, a crisis communications manager, on a retaliation campaign against Lively to boost Baldoni’s image, according to the Times and the Daily Beast. Jones’ lawsuit alleges that Abel and Nathan “secretly coordinated with Baldoni and Wayfarer to implement an aggressive media smear campaign” against Lively behind Jones’ back. Jones’ lawsuit was filed three days after Lively filed her own blockbuster complaint against Baldoni, alleging sexual harassment on the set of the film. In her complaint, filed with the California Civil Rights Department, Lively also alleged that Baldoni, Wayfarer and their public relationships representatives — Abel and Nathan — engaged in a “social manipulation” campaign to “destroy” her reputation, as The Hollywood Reporter explained. With the release of “It Ends With Us,” Baldoni allegedly feared that Lively’s allegations about his on-set behavior would be revealed, according to the New York Times. In response, Abel and Nathan began “to formulate a no-holds-barred strategy to discredit and suppress any potential revelations about Baldoni’s on-set behavior” to boost the actor’s profile. But even as Abel and Nathan sought to glorify Baldoni, Abel privately showed her disdain for him, according to the Daily Beast. Jones alleges that Abel and Nathan were motivated to carry out the alleged smear campaign by “avarice” and not because of “any sincere appreciation for Baldoni.” In the text exchange in which Abel called Baldoni “pompous,” she also complained that the actor wanted to go off on a “men’s retreat” over the summer, just as the film was being released. Over the past few years, Baldoni has built a personal brand around positioning himself as a #MeToo ally, who writes and speaks about the harm caused by toxic masculinity and men’s failure to embrace their vulnerability. In another series of text messages exchanged between Abel and an anonymous person on Jan. 13, 2024, the publicist described a kissing scene between Baldwin and Lively in the film as “so cringey,” the Daily Beast reported. When the recipient replied by saying, “Blake was probably grossed out too,” Abel allegedly responded: “Yeah and filed a cease and desist.” Related Articles Entertainment | ‘Morrison Hotel’ made famous by The Doors goes up in flames in LA Entertainment | Judge says woman accusing Jay-Z, Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs of raping her at age 13 can proceed anonymously Entertainment | ‘Baby Driver’ actor Hudson Meek dead at 16 Entertainment | Britney Spears spends Christmas with estranged son Jayden Entertainment | Hwang Dong-hyuk on killing off his ‘Squid Game’ characters and wanting to work with Jake Gyllenhaal Abel appears to be referring to the sexual harassment allegations Lively raised against Baldoni. In her complaint, Lively said she detailed her concerns about Baldoni during an “all-hands” meeting with him and producers in early January 2024. With her husband, Ryan Reynolds, also present, Lively alleged that Baldoni improvised unwanted kissing and intimate touching while filming scenes. She also claimed that he discussed his own sex life and porn addiction and that both he and Heath repeatedly entered her makeup trailer uninvited while she was undressed, including when she was breastfeeding. The Daily Beast said that Abel’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Jones’ lawsuit. Earlier in the week, Freedman categorically denied the allegations in Lively’s suit, writing in a statement that the suit is “completely false, outrageous, and intentionally salacious.” He also described it as “yet another desperate attempt to ‘fix’ (Lively’s) negative reputation which was garnered from her own remarks and actions during the campaign for the film.” Since news of Lively’s allegations against Baldoni broke over the weekend, the “Jane the Virgin” alum has faced cascading consequences, according to the New York Times. The powerhouse talent agency, William Morris Endeavor, dropped him as a client, while author Hoover and “It Ends With Us” cast members Jenny Slate and Brandon Sklenar voiced public support for Lively. Earlier this week, Liz Plank, who has co-hosted the “Man Enough” podcast with Baldoni and Heath, announced she would no longer be appearing on the show. Moreover, Vital Voices, a nonprofit dedicated to empowering women, rescinded an “ally” award it had presented to Baldoni earlier this month for “advocating on behalf of women and girls.”
Memphis says it won’t agree to federal oversight of police department ahead of investigation report
Tech Giant at a Crossroads. Can Nvidia Navigate Global Challenges?
Liverpool boss Arne Slot hailed “special” Mohamed Salah after seeing him fire the Premier League leaders to the brink of victory at Newcastle. The Reds ultimately left St James’ Park with only a point after Fabian Schar snatched a 3-3 draw at the end of a pulsating encounter, but Salah’s double – his 14th and 15th goals of the season – transformed a 2-1 deficit into a 3-2 lead before the Switzerland defender’s late intervention. The 32-year-old Egypt international’s future at Anfield remains a topic of debate with his current contract running down. Asked about Salah’s future, Slot said: “It’s difficult for me to predict the long-term future, but the only thing I can expect or predict is that he is in a very good place at the moment. Two goals and an assist for Mo tonight 👏 pic.twitter.com/tMXidgeA0P — Liverpool FC (@LFC) December 4, 2024 “He plays in a very good team that provides him with good opportunities and then he is able to do special things. “And what makes him for me even more special is that in the first hour or before we scored to make it 1-1, you thought, ‘He’s not playing his best game today’, and to then come up with a half-hour or 45 minutes – I don’t know how long it was – afterwards with an assist, two goals, having a shot on the bar, being a constant threat, that is something not many players can do if they’ve played the first hour like he did. “That is also what makes him special. If you just look at the goals, his finish is so clinical. He’s a special player, but that’s what we all know.” Salah did indeed endure a quiet opening 45 minutes by his standards and it was the Magpies who went in at the break a goal to the good after Alexander Isak’s stunning 35th-minute finish. Slot said: “The shot from Isak, I don’t even know if Caoimh (keeper Caoimhin Kelleher) saw that ball, as hard as it was.” Salah set up Curtis Jones to level five minutes into the second half and after Anthony Gordon has restored the hosts’ lead, levelled himself from substitute Trent Alexander-Arnold’s 68th-minute cross. He looked to have won it with a fine turn and finish – his ninth goal in seven league games – seven minutes from time, only for Schar to pounce from a tight angle in the 90th minute. Newcastle head coach Eddie Howe was delighted with the way his team took the game to the Reds four days after their disappointing 1-1 draw at Crystal Palace. Howe, who admitted his surprise that VAR official Stuart Attwell had not taken a dimmer view of a Virgil van Dijk shoulder barge on Gordon, said: “It’s mixed emotions. “Part of me feels we should have won it – a big part of me – but part of me is pleased we didn’t lose either because it was such a late goal for us. “Generally, I’m just pleased with the performance. There was much more attacking output, a much better feel about the team. “There was much better energy, and it was a really good performance against, for me, the best team we’ve played so far this season in the Premier League, so it was a big jump forward for us.”How to Quit Smoking For Good, According to Behavioral Therapists and Addiction ExpertsCroatia’s incumbent president wins most votes at polls but still faces runoffThere's nothing quite like slipping into a freshly dry-cleaned outfit — crisp, pristine and ready to conquer the day. But have you ever wondered about the process behind these immaculate results? Dryel At-Home Dry Cleaner Kit OGHom Steamer for Clothes, Handheld Clothing Steamer SALAV® Heavy Duty Commercial Full-Size Garment Steamer Woolite Extra Delicates Laundry Detergent Dirty Labs | Hand Wash and Delicates | Scent Free | 32 Loads Heritage Park Silk & Wool Fragrance Free Laundry Detergent Minky Homecare Outdoor Retractable Dual Clothesline Household Essentials Single Line Retractable Clothesline Whitmor 6026-2884 ClotheClothes Pins, S/50, Natural Wood, 50 40 Pack Clothes Pins Heavy Duty Amazon Basics Foldable Portable Laundry Drying Rack Honey-Can-Do Heavy Duty Gullwing Drying Rack, White Metal Despite its name, dry-cleaning isn't dry. Instead of water, your garments are bathed in a liquid solvent, typically perchloroethylene (PCE) — commonly known as PERC — that adeptly dissolves oil and grease without harming the fabric. Stains are pretreated with specialized agents before the clothes are submerged in PERC and gently agitated to remove dirt. Modern dry-cleaning machines operate in a closed-loop system, recovering nearly all the solvent to minimize environmental impact and reduce costs. After cleaning, any remaining stains are addressed, and the garments are pressed and given final touches. While effective, PERC and another closely related industrial solvent — trichloroethylene (TCE) — have been identified as potential health hazards. In response to these findings, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has taken significant steps to , which have been staples in the dry-cleaning industry for years. Dr. Paul Savage, founder and CEO at and a toxin expert, emphasizes the significance of this regulatory action, "The EPA's decision to ban TCE and PCE solvents is a watershed moment in public health policy. These carcinogenic chemicals, widely used in dry-cleaning and industrial applications, have been linked to cancers such as kidney, liver and testicular cancers, as well as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma," he explains. These risks are present, even at very low exposure levels. Furthermore, their widespread presence in the environment contaminates water, soil, air and even food, underscoring the urgent need for decisive action. , associate professor at Texas Christian University, explains, " have linked long-term exposure to increased cancer risks among dry-cleaning workers and nearby communities. Communities near dry-cleaning facilities using PERC have reported higher rates of cancer, prompting EPA action under the ." This regulatory crackdown has prompted a reevaluation of garment care routines. As the phaseout of these chemicals progresses over the next decade, the industry is expected to adopt safer, more sustainable alternatives. But in the meantime, what steps should you take to safeguard your health? Let's uncover the truth about what lingers in your clothes, explore how these changes impact your wardrobe and wellness and consider safer alternatives to dry-cleaning. PERC and TCE have long been integral to the dry-cleaning industry, thanks to their potent grease-busting properties. PCE has been the predominant solvent in dry-cleaning, prized for its chemical stability and nonflammable nature, which allow it to remove stains without damaging delicate fabrics. While TCE is less commonly used in dry-cleaning, it plays a significant role in industrial applications such as metal degreasing and as an ingredient in various cleaning products. However, exposure to PERC and TCE pose significant health risks: : Both chemicals are classified as probable human carcinogens. PCE exposure has been linked to cancers of the liver, kidney, brain and testicles, while TCE exposure is associated with . : Short-term exposure to high levels of these solvents can lead to dizziness, headaches and cognitive impairments. Chronic exposure may result in long-term neurological damage. : that PCE and TCE may adversely affect reproductive health and compromise immune system function. The health consequences are not the only concerns. The environmental persistence of PERC and TCE also presents dangers. Improper disposal and leaks can lead to soil and groundwater contamination, posing risks to ecosystems. Furthermore, the volatilization of these chemicals contributes to air quality degradation, affecting both indoor and outdoor environments. The EPA's ban will reduce the impact of PERC and TCE on several groups, including employees in the dry-cleaning sector who are regularly exposed to high levels of these chemicals and residents living near dry-cleaning businesses. As Galbadage notes, " PERC emissions contaminate indoor air and groundwater, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations living near dry-cleaning facilities. Phasing out PERC addresses these health inequities." Around are employed in the laundry and dry-cleaning industry in the U.S. These individuals can inhale toxic fumes, leading to delirium, severe respiratory issues and death, while chronic low-level exposure significantly increases cancer and other health risks. But what about consumers? Studies assessing PERC and TCE levels in dry-cleaned fabrics are few and far between. However, found that wool, polyester and cotton fabrics retained significant amounts of PCE after dry-cleaning, with levels increasing after multiple cleaning cycles. In contrast, silk fabrics didn't retain noticeable amounts. Furthermore, PCE slowly evaporated from the fabrics when exposed to normal room air conditions, indicating that the chemical lingers in clothing and is potentially released into the environment over time. The amount of PCE residue varied between different dry-cleaning establishments, suggesting that cleaning processes and equipment efficiency can influence chemical retention in fabrics. So, even though dry-cleaned clothes are considered “safe” to wear, the chemicals may still pose some risks, especially to those with sensitive skin or those who regularly dry-clean their clothes, leading to greater buildup. The controversy surrounding PERC and TCE isn't new. In the absence of federal regulations, some states have taken action. For example, California began phasing out PERC in dry-cleaning in 2007 after identifying it as a in 1991, with a deadline to stop using PERC in dry-cleaning processes by Jan. 1, 2023. Recognizing these hazards, the EPA has established a 10-year timeline for phasing out PCE in dry- cleaning. The agency has also banned all consumer uses and many commercial applications of TCE, with most prohibitions taking effect within a year. As Savage notes, "It’s encouraging to see the EPA take this step, but it’s important to recognize that the full elimination of PERC may take time. Consumers should proactively seek out eco-friendly cleaning options in the meantime." But why is there such an extended period to eliminate these chemicals? Several factors influence this extended timeline: The dry-cleaning industry predominantly comprises small, family-owned businesses. Immediate compliance with new regulations would require significant investments in alternative solvents and equipment, potentially imposing financial burdens that could jeopardize their operations. Identifying, testing and implementing safer alternatives to PERC and TCE is a complex process. Industries need adequate time to research and adopt practical and economically viable substitutes. Dry-cleaning machines and other industrial equipment represent substantial investments with long operational lifespans. Mandating an abrupt cessation of PERC and TCE use would render existing equipment obsolete, leading to financial losses. Transitioning to new chemicals or processes necessitates comprehensive employee training to ensure safe and effective use. The production and distribution networks for alternative chemicals and equipment need time to scale to meet increased demand. A phased approach ensures supply chains can adjust without causing shortages or delays. The timeline for phasing out PERC and TCE reflects a strategic effort to protect public health while allowing industries sufficient time to adapt. If you'd prefer to avoid traditional dry-cleaning as it transitions away from PERC and TCE, several safer and more sustainable alternatives are available for garment care. Commercial wet cleaning Commercial wet cleaning uses water and biodegradable detergents, making it suitable for delicate fabrics like wool and silk. It's an environmentally friendly method that eliminates the health risks of solvents. Specialized equipment allows for gentle agitation and precise control over variables like temperature and moisture, ensuring thorough cleaning without damaging your clothes. Liquid carbon dioxide cleaning This innovative technique employs pressurized liquid carbon dioxide (CO2) as a solvent. Garments are placed in a specialized machine where CO2 removes dirt and stains. The process is energy-efficient and avoids toxic chemicals. Additionally, the CO2 used is often captured as a by-product of existing industrial processes, further reducing environmental impact. Win win! Handwashing and line-drying Let's go old school and do the washing by hand! For many “dry-clean only” items, gentle handwashing with mild detergent is a safe alternative. After washing, flat drying helps maintain the garment's shape and quality. It's an economical, chemical-free method, but check care labels and test a small area first to ensure the fabric can handle water without damage. Steam cleaning Steam can remove odors and light stains. Handheld steamers or steam functions on irons can refresh garments without full washing. Steam cleaning is gentle on fabrics and reduces the need for chemical cleaners. It's particularly useful for items that wrinkle easily or have been in storage. At-home dry-cleaning kits These kits are a convenient way to freshen garments using your dryer. However, their effectiveness varies, and some may still contain chemicals of concern. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has evaluated products like and is less than impressed with their safety profiles. It's advisable to research specific products and consider their ingredients before use. Attempting to care for delicate “dry-clean-only” garments at home can be a bit daunting — one wrong move, and you could have a shredded silk or shrunken wool disaster on your hands. But with the correct methods, you can keep your wardrobe pristine without risking fabric fiascos. Here are our top picks for safely cleaning dry-clean-only clothing at home. In addition to in-dryer dry- cleaning kits, we've selected our favorite steamers, gentle detergents and accessories for line drying garments, as dry-clean-only fabrics typically shouldn't be thrown in the dryer. This is a convenient solution for refreshing delicate and dry-clean-only garments in 20 minutes. The starter kit includes a stain-removal pen to pretreat stains and eight cleaning cloths. Simply place a cloth in the dryer with one to five garments of similar material and tumble dry on medium heat. The kit also contains a scented wrinkle-releaser spray to remove static and wrinkles between cleanings. It works on most fabrics, including wool, linen, silk and denim. Nearly 500 Amazon reviews have rated this product 4.5 stars out of 5. , "This really works," and "The stain remover is incredibly effective." Another , "I'm beyond amazed. I put a cleaning sheet in with two filthy pairs of linen pants. 20 minutes later, the pants are fresh, clean and wrinkle free. I don't know how these possibly work, but they really really do." However, it's important to note that kits like these still include chemicals, although they're free from banned substances. Other Dryel products have scored poorly in EWG ingredient concern ratings, although not this one specifically. With over 51,000 reviews averaging 4.3 stars out of 5 and costing under $25, the is a solid choice. The 240ml water tank heats up in under 2 minutes and provides up to 15 minutes of continuous steam. Plus, the 9-foot power cord makes it convenient to use. Customers love its compact size, making it suitable for travel. However, note that while effective on light to medium fabrics, it may be less efficient on larger, heavier items. If you're looking for something that can handle heavy-duty cleaning, the is a better choice. This robust appliance has 1,800 watts of steam power and an extra-large 3-liter water tank, providing up to 90 minutes of continuous steam. This detergent is specifically formulated for delicate fabrics, with a hypoallergenic solution free from harsh ingredients like bleach, phosphates or enzymes. Leveraging bioenzyme technology, this detergent cleans delicate fabrics without compromising their quality. It's hyperconcentrated, nontoxic and biodegradable. This pH-neutral, hypoallergenic detergent is free from enzymes, ultraconcentrated and dermatologist-tested, making it a reliable choice for washing delicate garments, particularly silk and wool. Retractable clotheslines are perfect for indoor and outdoor use, providing flexibility and saving space. The is a heavy-duty, PVC-coated line with a massive 98 feet of drying space. If your space is smaller, the has 40 feet of drying space. This is a great addition to laundry rooms or even bedrooms when you need to hang up clothes inside. Clothespins are essential for securing garments to clotheslines, preventing them from falling or being thrown around by the wind. While there are lots of affordable options to choose between, these simple, classic wooden clothespins come in a pack of 50. Wooden clothespins sometimes break with frequent use. These stainless-steel pins are a good alternative (and they're ones that Yahoo Health Editor, Laura Williams, personally uses). Drying racks are versatile tools for flat-drying clothes so they keep their shape. They come in various designs to accommodate different spaces and laundry volumes. This lightweight yet sturdy rack offers ample space for drying clothes and folds flat for easy storage. This rack is ideal for large families and has multiple drying positions and a high capacity. What is PERC, and why is it being banned? "PERC refers to perchloroethylene, a harmful volatile organic compound (VOC) widely used as a solvent in dry-cleaning shops. However, it is also used by consumers as brake cleaners and adhesive products, as well as for many industrial processes," explains , associate specialist in air pollution exposure assessment and epidemiology at the UC Irvine Program in Public Health. It's also worth noting that PERC can degrade into TCE, another cancer-causing solvent. "The EPA's recent move to ban PERC is due to the chemical's casual link with many adverse health conditions including liver, kidney, brain and testicular cancer, as well as damage to the kidney, liver and immune system, neurotoxicity and reproductive toxicity," Masri continues. Is PERC completely banned in dry-cleaning? PERC is not yet banned, explains Masri. In December 2024, the EPA issued a final rule prohibiting many uses of PCE and for those uses that are not prohibited. This includes implementing a Workplace Chemical Protection Program and prescriptive controls to ensure safety in environments where PCE is still in use. Specifically for the dry-cleaning sector, the EPA has set a 10-year withdrawal period to eliminate the risk to individuals who work or spend considerable time at dry-cleaning facilities. "The EPA’s action focuses on phasing out PERC from dry-cleaning, with clear deadlines for industries to adopt safer alternatives. However, some facilities may temporarily continue to use PERC as they transition to modern technologies. The extent of the ban will also depend on enforcement timelines and compliance at the local level," explains Savage. Galbadage notes that using PCE in newly acquired dry-cleaning machines is prohibited after six months from the rule's issuance. Compliance dates for existing machines vary depending on their type, with older machines being phased out sooner than newer ones. Many dry-cleaners have already begun this transition. Therefore, while PCE is not entirely banned in dry-cleaning, its use is being systematically eliminated, with complete prohibition expected within the next decade. What is the EPA doing to enforce the ban? "Effective enforcement is key to the success of this initiative," says Savage. This year has seen the EPA , doubling financial penalties issued to polluters and initiating its first-ever arrest related to a climate change crime. "The EPA is enforcing the ban through stringent regulations, requiring industries to adopt safer alternatives and providing oversight to ensure compliance. They are also working with state and local agencies to monitor progress and implement penalties for noncompliance," Savage adds. Masri also notes that measures include mandatory recordkeeping, reporting and environmental monitoring. For example, chemical manufacturers and processors must maintain detailed records of significant adverse reactions to health or the environment caused by chemical substances. These records must be available for EPA inspection upon request. In 2024, the agency concluded over 1,850 civil cases and charged 121 criminal defendants, reflecting a commitment to reducing pollution and protecting public health. With the addition of 300 new employees, the EPA is now better equipped to enforce regulations concerning PERC and TCE in dry-cleaning and other sectors, ensuring compliance to protect public health and the environment. What can I do to minimize my exposure to PERC? You can significantly reduce your exposure to PERC by adopting these practices: : Opt for dry-cleaners using non-PERC methods, such as wet or liquid carbon dioxide cleaning, suggests Savage. : Galbadage recommends storing dry-cleaned garments in well-ventilated areas to dissipate residual PERC fumes. : Before bringing dry-cleaned items into your home, remove them from plastic bags and air them outdoors, says Savage. Masri adds, "Find out if you live downwind of a nearby dry-cleaning shop and purchase a if so." Look for one with an activated carbon filter. Some models combine these with HEPA filters to also capture particulate matter. Masri advises caution when using certain cleaning solvents, carpet cleaners and adhesives that may contain PCE. Opt for alternatives labeled as PCE-free or those using safer solvents. : Stay up-to-date with EPA guidelines and local regulations regarding PERC use and exposure. Because PCE can contaminate groundwater and drinking water supplies, Masri also recommends testing your water for contamination, especially if you rely on well water or live near industrial areas. Certified laboratories can perform these tests, and local health departments can guide testing procedures. , associate specialist in air pollution exposure assessment and epidemiology at the UC Irvine Program in Public Health Paul Savage, MD, founder and CEO at and a toxin expert , associate professor at Texas Christian University
Tom Werner Shares of cloud-based software provider Toast, Inc. ( NYSE: TOST ) have exploded recently. The company’s footprint in the restaurant industry has allowed it to grow at massive rates in recent years, and while its past growth rates are unsustainable, I If you liked this idea, sign up for a no-obligation free trial of my Seeking Alpha Marketplace service, Timely Trader ! I sift through various asset classes to find the best places for your capital, helping you maximize your returns. Timely Trader seeks to find winners before they become winners, and keep you out of losers. In addition, you get access to our community via chat, direct access to me, real-time price alerts, a model portfolio, and more. Sign up today! Josh Arnold has been covering financial markets for a decade, utilizing a combination of technical and fundamental analysis to identify potential winners early on in their growth cycles. Josh's focus is mainly on growth stocks. His goal is efficient and profitable use of capital, which overly rigid buy-and-hold strategies do not allow. Timely Trader Learn more. Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of TOST either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.Supermarket chain Jumbo has its use of artificial intelligence to detect shoplifting, citing concerns about customer experience and societal impacts. CEO Ton van Veen confirmed the decision, stating, “We tried to use technology to recognize deviant behavioral patterns, but we won’t continue with it.” Jumbo announced at the start of the year that it loses over 100 million euros annually due to shoplifting, a significant blow to the company’s bottom line. “That’s money we can’t pass on to customers in the form of lower prices,” said Van Veen. This year, Jumbo managed to reduce losses from theft by 30 million euros, cutting theft-related losses to 1 percent of total revenue. “We’ve reduced it by a third, but I believe it should be brought down to no more than half a percent of turnover,” Van Veen said. “These savings can then be passed on to our customers.” Jumbo had implemented AI trials to analyze customer behavior and identify potential shoplifters based on deviations in patterns. The experiment included analyzing surveillance footage and conducting targeted random checks at self-checkout counters. Despite these efforts, the initiative failed to meet expectations. “It does not enhance the shopping experience,” Van Veen said. “Customers are not potential thieves. They are absolutely welcome, even if someone forgets to scan an item occasionally. We don’t want to respond to the hardening of society with tougher measures.” Van Veen emphasized the importance of social interaction in combating theft, saying, “Social control and making eye contact with customers are key.” He further ruled out deploying body cameras for employees, a measure implemented by other supermarket chains such as Dirk earlier this year. “Bodycams are not the answer,” he stated. Instead, Jumbo is focusing on traditional security measures, including enhanced surveillance, stricter random checks at self-checkout counters, and increased employee presence on the shop floor. The company has also implemented measures such as issuing fines of 181 euros to shoplifters and frequently imposing store bans.
-
"> -
"> -
"> -
">
