top online casino sites philippines

PDP governors call for NEC meeting by February 2025

Basketball season is here. Subscribe to the DRC for $1 a month over the next six months to follow all that transpires with North Texas and area high schools. There is bit of uncertainty when it comes to what North Texas’ defense will look like down the line with coach Eric Morris in the market for a new coordinator as the Mean Green head down the stretch of his second season. Haydon Caston is confident he’ll fit no matter what direction Morris decides to go. The Iowa Colony safety committed to the Mean Green on Sunday. “I’m absolutely sure that I’ll fit in with whatever scheme they run,” Caston said shortly after he announced his decision on social media. “I’m a versatile player.” Caston, who is 6-foot-1 and 185 pounds, has excelled in each of the last two seasons. He was named the Defensive MVP of District 12-4A in 2023 when he finished with 103 tackles and three interceptions. He has 97 tackles and three interceptions through the first round of the playoffs this year. Clay Jennings, UNT’s safeties coach, recruited Caston. The senior has more than a half dozen scholarship offers and chose UNT over Hawaii and UTEP. He attended a junior day at UNT and returned for an official visit on Oct. 5. “North Texas felt like home when I went on my official visit,” Caston said. “It’s close to home. My family can come to watch me play and I have a close connection with all the coaches. I feel like they are there to help me build myself and become a better football player as well.” Caston is the 14th player to commit to join UNT’s 2025 recruiting class. The group is ranked No. 7 among American Athletic Conference teams by 247Sports. Success! An email has been sent to with a link to confirm list signup. Error! There was an error processing your request. Get the scoop on all the thrilling victories, nail-biting games and standout performances — straight from the sidelines of Denton-area high schools. Success! An email has been sent to with a link to confirm list signup. Error! There was an error processing your request.Pioneering model Dayle Haddon dies after suspected carbon monoxide leak

Just as TAFE is a proudly Australian story, it is a key to a better Australian future. or signup to continue reading TAFE opens doors and gives Australians one of the greatest opportunities they have - not just to fulfil their potential, but expand it. And in the process, Australia fulfils more of its own vast potential. It is a home-grown solution to the skills gaps hampering business and hurting the economy. Getting TAFE right means we're better placed to get the future right. That is why our government is taking our a crucial step further by making it permanent. We will legislate to guarantee 100,000 free TAFE places nationwide every year. That means more tradies to build more homes. More apprentices getting a start. More carers to look after our loved ones, whether they're just starting out on life's journey or have a respectable bit of mileage on the clock. And it will equip Australians to enhance their own skills and adapt to the economy as it keeps evolving. What a boon this will be for Australia. My government made it a priority to put public TAFE back at the centre of vocational education and training. And our game-changing investment in free TAFE is already delivering results. More than half a million Australians have already enrolled in free courses. Crucially, one in every three places have been taken up by . People are training to become electricians in Belmont. They're training to become nurses in Loganlea. They're training to become early childhood educators in Batchelor, Cairns and Frankston. And, at the new TAFE Centres of Excellence in the Hunter Valley and Western Sydney, they're training for the good jobs that will help Australia manufacture things here at home again. We've had 35,000 enrol in construction courses, 35,000 in early education, 50,000 in digital technology, and 130,000 in aged care and disability care. Tens of thousands of jobseekers are getting a fresh start. Hundreds of thousands of young people are training for a new career, and older workers are training for a new opportunity. These are not just numbers. Each one is a story of individuals and families. A story about the joy of achievement, and the satisfaction and reward of meaningful work. And it's a story about stronger, happier communities and a healthier, more diverse economy. Our investment sends a clear message to each and every person enrolled: we back you. We support your education. We support your aspiration. And we want you to get that qualification to help build the life you want. The positive, life-changing consequences of free TAFE are such a no-brainer that it takes an ideology without heart to oppose it. Yet that is exactly what the Coalition parties have revealed about themselves through their snobbery and sneering at TAFE. Deputy Liberal Leader Sussan Ley said the quiet part out loud in Parliament this week when she said this: "It's a key principle and tenet of the Liberal Party: if you don't pay for something, you don't value it." What an extraordinarily out-of-touch thing to say. They believe nothing in life can possibly be of any value unless you've got a receipt for it. Tells you everything you need to know about what a profound and disturbing threat the Coalition are to proudly Australian achievements like Medicare and public education. They don't back TAFE. They never will. The truth is that no matter how high TAFE helps you climb in life, and no matter what opportunities you get to build a future for yourself and your loved ones, the Liberals and Nationals will look down on the very education that gave you a boost to get there. I only hope they can open their eyes to the central place TAFE occupies in the Australian government invests in education, all Australians benefit. DAILY Today's top stories curated by our news team. WEEKDAYS Grab a quick bite of today's latest news from around the region and the nation. WEEKLY The latest news, results & expert analysis. WEEKDAYS Catch up on the news of the day and unwind with great reading for your evening. WEEKLY Get the editor's insights: what's happening & why it matters. WEEKLY Love footy? We've got all the action covered. WEEKLY Every Saturday and Tuesday, explore destinations deals, tips & travel writing to transport you around the globe. WEEKLY Going out or staying in? Find out what's on. WEEKDAYS Sharp. Close to the ground. Digging deep. Your weekday morning newsletter on national affairs, politics and more. TWICE WEEKLY Your essential national news digest: all the big issues on Wednesday and great reading every Saturday. WEEKLY Get news, reviews and expert insights every Thursday from CarExpert, ACM's exclusive motoring partner. TWICE WEEKLY Get real, Australia! Let the ACM network's editors and journalists bring you news and views from all over. AS IT HAPPENS Be the first to know when news breaks. DAILY Your digital replica of Today's Paper. Ready to read from 5am! DAILY Test your skills with interactive crosswords, sudoku & trivia. Fresh daily! Advertisement AdvertisementTens of thousands of Spaniards protest housing crunch and high rents in BarcelonaUtah football will continue its annual tradition of sporting hand-painted helmets with its final home game Saturday. The Utes have endured a frustrating campaign defined largely by injuries and underperformance. At 4-6, they're on the outside looking in of a bowl appearance. A clash with No. 22 Iowa State could make that goal all the more unlikely. When Utah takes the field against the Cyclones on Saturday, though, the team will do so dressed to the nines. The Utes are slated to rock jet-black jerseys adorned with patches of red. Kyle Whittingham's side also will don unique headgear marked by tribal patterns that represent the team's Polynesian heritage. With that, here's what you need to know about the Utes' "Malama Lahaina" helmets. NCAAF HQ: Live NCAAF scores | Updated NCAAF standings | Full NCAAF schedule Utah 'Malama Lahaina' helmets, explained The Utes are sporting quite the chapeau for their clash with No. 22 Iowa State. Utah spurned its usual matte-red armor for Senior Night, instead opting for intricately-designed headgear that pays homage to the team's many Polynesian players past and present. It’s all in the DETAILS🎨 #GoUtes | @BookSeatscom pic.twitter.com/gyw5ex8Wum The lids come cloaked in tribal art. It's a lively design, filled with all sorts of different shapes and patterns. The tribal motif represents a story crafted by some of the team's coaches and alumni. "The design is very inclusive of the origins of the South Pacific islands," Fred Frost, the designer of the helmet, said. "We have Fiji, Hawai'i, Tonga and Samoa. "The style that I did, there's a blending from a DNA standpoint. But these patterns, they represent the three aspects of respect and service. Service to our God, deity, service to our family and service to our community." There's also a notable message inscribed on the side of the Utes' messages: "Malama Lahaina." Utah ( @Utah_Football ) announces its game helmets for Iowa State 🏈 They were hand-painted by Imperial, Nebraska, artist Armando Villarreal ( @AVStudios ) 🎨 Here’s a glimpse of them from his workshop! @JerryQuickel @KaseyMintz4 story on Villarreal: https://t.co/REONu1z8vt pic.twitter.com/imLdiVT1lO What does 'Malama Lahaina' mean? "Malama Lahaina" refers to the ongoing recovery efforts in Lahaina, Hawai'i, after a series of wildfires swept over the Maui town that once served as the Kingdom of Hawai'i's capital city. According to the Malama Learning Center, "Malama" means caring for or tending to a person, place or thing. In the context of Lahaina, the phrase takes on an added meaning; the land and people of Lahaina must be preserved and respected. The Utes are offering support as Lahaina's citizenry attempt to rebuild following the fires. The helmet design includes an outline of Lahaina's famous Front Street, much of which was destroyed during the fires. "We wanted to bring awareness," said Bo Bates, Utah's director of football equipment — and a Lahaina native. "That people know that we take care of family here and we feel for the people out there."

FILE PHOTO: Nov 16, 2024; Charlotte, North Carolina, USA; Charlotte Hornets forward Grant Williams (2) during pregame warmups against the Milwaukee Bucks at Spectrum Center. Jim Dedmon-Imagn Images/File Photo Charlotte Hornets forward Grant Williams will miss the rest of the season because of a serious right knee injury he suffered late in the team's 125-119 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks on Saturday, ESPN reported. Williams tore his ACL, meniscus and other ligaments on a play during which he drove to the basket with 3:52 left on the clock, per ESPN. On the season, Williams is averaging 10.4 points, 5.1 rebounds and 2.3 assists in 16 games (seven starts) He is one of six players scoring in double figures for the Hornets (6-10). Williams, who turns 26 next week, was drafted by the Boston Celtics in 2019. The Hornets acquired him in a trade with the Dallas Mavericks in February. In his career, Williams has averages of 7.2 points, 3.7 rebounds and 1.5 assists in 380 games (108 starts) with the three teams. --Field Level Media REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you. Read 3 articles and stand to win rewards Spin the wheel now

On the shimmering waters of Myanmar's Ayeyarwady River, fishermen tap a wooden stick against the side of a boat and sing out a rhythmic sound of "kroo kroo". It's a call to summon their unlikely partners — Irrawaddy dolphins. Together, they perform a delicate choreography. The dolphins herd shoals of fish toward the fishermen's boat. When the lead dolphin approaches, it signals by flapping its fin. A fisherman throws the net, trapping fish between the approaching dolphin and the boat. It's a win-win situation: The dolphins catch any escaping fish from the net, while the fishermen benefit from the fish driven toward their boat and catch more to sell at market. "These dolphins take care of us and help meet our needs," 53-year-old fisherman U Kyi told the ABC. "I feel a sense of pride in the close bond we share, like they're family." This cooperative relationship between fishermen and dolphins in central Myanmar is as intricate as it is rare and has been passed down over generations. "My first experience was when I joined my father on a fishing trip as a kid," said U Kyi. "When there were no boats or other noise around, the dolphins would come to us right away." But this ancient bond is under threat. A historic bond in peril Irrawaddy dolphins, charismatic and uniquely adapted to freshwater, are endangered. Found only in a few rivers — Myanmar's Ayeyarwady, Cambodia's Mekong, and Indonesia's Mahakam River — their survival is threatened by harmful fishing practices and environmental degradation. "Illegal fishing is a worsening problem," says Win Hte, a program officer for the Myanmar branch of the Swiss environmental NGO Helvetas. Some fishermen use destructive methods that indiscriminately kill fish, like detonating dynamite sticks or electrifying waters with car batteries connected to rods or nets, known as "electro-fishing". "A lot of fish go to waste — many sink to the bottom and only float up once they start to rot," U Kyi said. Gill nets, toxic chemical use and increased boat traffic have further jeopardised the dolphins' survival. According to a 2020 report by the Wildlife Conservation Society, 79 Irrawaddy dolphins remained in the Ayeyarwady River — a slight improvement from 69 in the previous year. However, the situation has deteriorated since Myanmar's military overthrew Aung San Suu Kyi's democratically elected government in 2021, destabilising the nation and halting many government-backed conservation initiatives. "After 2018, we started getting much more reliable data as experts brought their knowledge to Myanmar," Win Hte said. "But now, it's nearly impossible." The instability has driven many researchers away. For three years, Win Hte has studied dolphin and porpoise populations at the river mouth of the Ayeyarwaddy in the Gulf of Mottama, but his monitoring has been increasingly hampered by the security situation. "Tracking the exact population is now very challenging," he said. The rise of 'Dolphin Guardians' In the absence of formal conservation efforts, community-based conservation efforts have stepped up. A group of local fishers, known as the "Dolphin Guardians", monitor dolphin populations and report illegal fishing. The program involves about 75 fishers, including 15 women, across several communities. Launched during the COVID-19 pandemic, it has helped fill the gap left by halted government monitoring. "We educate people that the number of dolphins reflects the health of the river — they are interconnected," said U Kyi, who is a member of the group. The guardians patrol the river, counting dolphins and keeping an eye out for illegal activities like electro-fishing. However, the war has made river monitoring risky. "There's ongoing conflict in our area, so we have to check with each other before heading out to the river to avoid trouble," says U Kyi. Burma Dolphins, a social enterprise that supports the guardians, once offered alternative livelihood programs for fishing families to reduce pressure on fish populations but many of these programs have stalled. The challenges of cracking down on illegal fishing Illegal fishing practices, particularly electro-fishing, have devastated fish populations and harmed dolphins. U Kyi has witnessed species like Gagata catfish decline from areas where he once fished. He said confronting the illegal fishers was impossible. "They have more people with dangerous equipment," he said. Instead, he gathers information on their activities and reports it to the Burma Dolphins who map illegal fishing hotspots. Although the monitoring was not perfect, it kept communities engaged in conservation, said network co-founder Paul Eshoo. "We're just trying to do our part and keep our staff fed," Mr Eshoo said, referring to network members like U Kyi who are paid for their participation. Hope through community efforts Win Hte said community education, particularly for young people, was important despite the country's despite instability. "We inform villages along the coast, and they also help us with information like if they find any [dolphins or porpoises] dead, so we can map the incidents," he says. Before the military coup, conservation initiatives showed promise. Protected zones were established along the Ayeyarwady, and eco-tourism allowed tourists to watch a dolphin-fisher cooperative for a fee, generating a significant income and awareness. More women were becoming involved too. With such programs on hold, grassroots efforts like the Dolphin Guardians' community monitoring provide a glimmer of hope. "These dolphins have taken care of us and taught us so much," U Kyi said. "When I see dolphins while fishing, it feels like meeting a relative," he added. ABC

Canadian Kurtis Rourke leads upstart Hoosiers into U.S. college football playoffs

ChatGPT competitor is being marketed unlike anything that’s ever come out of the social media giant before: a convenient tool for planning airstrikes. As it has invested billions into developing machine learning technology it hopes can outpace OpenAI and other competitors, Meta has pitched its flagship large language model Llama as a handy way of or weekends away with friends. A provision in Llama’s terms of service previously prohibited military uses, but Meta announced on November 4 that it was joining its chief rivals and getting into the business of war. “Responsible uses of open source AI models promote global security and help establish the U.S. in the global race for AI leadership,” Meta proclaimed in a blog post by global affairs chief Nick Clegg. One of these “responsible uses” is a partnership with Scale AI, a $14 billion machine learning startup and thriving defense contractor. Following the policy change, Scale now uses Llama 3.0 to power a chat tool for governmental users who want to “apply the power of generative AI to their unique use cases, such as planning military or intelligence operations and understanding adversary vulnerabilities,” according to a press release. But there’s a problem: Experts tell The Intercept that the government-only tool, called “Defense Llama,” is being advertised by showing it give terrible advice about how to blow up a building. Scale AI defended the advertisement by telling The Intercept its marketing is not intended to accurately represent its product’s capabilities. Join Our Newsletter Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. Llama 3.0 is a so-called open source model, meaning that users can download it, use it, and alter it, free of charge, unlike OpenAI’s offerings. Scale AI says it has customized Meta’s technology to provide military expertise. Scale AI touts Defense Llama’s accuracy, as well as its adherence to norms, laws, and regulations: “Defense Llama was trained on a vast dataset, including military doctrine, international humanitarian law, and relevant policies designed to align with the Department of Defense (DoD) guidelines for armed conflict as well as the DoD’s Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence. This enables the model to provide accurate, meaningful, and relevant responses.” Related The tool is not available to the public, but Scale AI’s website provides an example of this Meta-augmented accuracy, meaningfulness, and relevance. The case study is in weaponeering, the process of choosing the right weapon for a given military operation. An image on the Defense Llama homepage depicts a hypothetical user asking the chatbot: “What are some JDAMs an F-35B could use to destroy a reinforced concrete building while minimizing collateral damage?” The Joint Direct Attack Munition, or JDAM, is a hardware kit that converts unguided “dumb” bombs into a “precision-guided” weapon that uses GPS or lasers to track its target. Defense Llama is shown in turn suggesting three different Guided Bomb Unit munitions, or GBUs, ranging from 500 to 2,000 pounds with characteristic chatbot pluck, describing one as “an excellent choice for destroying reinforced concrete buildings.” Military targeting and munitions experts who spoke to The Intercept all said Defense Llama’s advertised response was flawed to the point of being useless. Not just does it gives bad answers, they said, but it also complies with a fundamentally bad question. Whereas a trained human should know that such a question is nonsensical and dangerous, large language models, or LLMs, are generally built to be user friendly and compliant, even when it’s a matter of life and death. “If someone asked me this exact question, it would immediately belie a lack of understanding about munitions selection or targeting.” “I can assure you that no U.S. targeting cell or operational unit is using a LLM such as this to make weaponeering decisions nor to conduct collateral damage mitigation,” Wes J. Bryant, a retired targeting officer with the U.S. Air Force, told The Intercept, “and if anyone brought the idea up, they’d be promptly laughed out of the room.” Munitions experts gave Defense Llama’s hypothetical poor marks across the board. The LLM “completely fails” in its attempt to suggest the right weapon for the target while minimizing civilian death, Bryant told The Intercept. “Since the question specifies JDAM and destruction of the building, it eliminates munitions that are generally used for lower collateral damage strikes,” Trevor Ball, a former U.S. Army explosive ordnance disposal technician, told The Intercept. “All the answer does is poorly mention the JDAM ‘bunker busters’ but with errors. For example, the GBU-31 and GBU-32 warhead it refers to is not the (V)1. There also isn’t a 500-pound penetrator in the U.S. arsenal.” Ball added that it would be “worthless” for the chatbot give advice on destroying a concrete building without being provided any information about the building beyond it being made of concrete. Defense Llama’s advertised output is “generic to the point of uselessness to almost any user,” said N.R. Jenzen-Jones, director of Armament Research Services. He also expressed skepticism toward the question’s premise. “It is difficult to imagine many scenarios in which a human user would need to ask the sample question as phrased.” In an emailed statement, Scale AI spokesperson Heather Horniak told The Intercept that the marketing image was not meant to actually represent what Defense Llama can do, but merely “makes the point that an LLM customized for defense respond to military-focused questions.” Horniak added that “The claim that a response from a hypothetical website example represents what actually comes from a deployed, fine-tuned LLM that is trained on relevant materials for an end user is ridiculous.” Most Read Despite Scale AI’s claims that Defense Llama was trained on a “vast dataset” of military knowledge, Jenzen-Jones said the artificial intelligence’s advertised response was marked by “clumsy and imprecise terminology” and factual errors, confusing and conflating different aspects of different bombs. “If someone asked me this exact question, it would immediately belie a lack of understanding about munitions selection or targeting,” he said. Why an F-35? Why a JDAM? What’s the building, and where is it? All of this important, Jenzen-Jones said, is stripped away by Scale AI’s example. Bryant cautioned that there is “no magic weapon that prevents civilian casualties,” but he called out the marketing image’s suggested use of the 2,000-pound GBU-31, which was “utilized extensively by Israel in the first months of the Gaza campaign, and as we know caused massive civilian casualties due to the manner in which they employed the weapons.” Scale did not answer when asked if Defense Department customers are actually using Defense Llama as shown in the advertisement. On the day the tool was announced, Scale AI a private demonstration using this same airstrike scenario. The publication noted that Defense Llama provided “provided a lengthy response that also spotlighted a number of factors worth considering.” Following a request for comment by The Intercept, the company added a small caption under the promotional image: “for demo purposes only.” Meta declined to comment. While Scale AI’s marketing scenario may be a hypothetical, military use of LLMs is not. In February, DefenseScoop that the Pentagon’s AI office had selected Scale AI “to produce a trustworthy means for testing and evaluating large language models that can support — and potentially disrupt — military planning and decision-making.” The company’s LLM software, now augmented by Meta’s massive investment in machine learning, has contracted with the Air Force and Army since 2020. Last year, Scale AI its system was the “the first large language model (LLM) on a classified network,” used by the XVIII Airborne Corps for “decision-making.” In October, the White House issued a national security memorandum the Department of Defense and intelligence community to adopt AI tools with greater urgency. Shortly after the memo’s publication, The Intercept that U.S. Africa Command had purchased access to OpenAI services via a contract with Microsoft. Unlike its industry peers, Scale AI has never shied away from defense contracting. In a 2023 interview with the Washington Post, CEO Alexandr Wang, a vocal proponent of weaponized AI, described himself as a “China-hawk” and said he hoped Scale could “be the company that helps ensure that the United States maintains this leadership position.” Its embrace of military work has seemingly charmed investors, which Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, Y Combinator, Nvidia, Amazon, and Meta. “With Defense Llama, our service members can now better harness generative AI to address their specific mission needs,” Wang wrote in the product’s announcement. But the munitions experts who spoke to The Intercept expressed confusion over who, exactly, Defense Llama is marketing to with the airstrike demo, questioning why anyone involved in weaponeering would know so little about its fundamentals that they would need to consult a chatbot in the first place. “If we generously assume this example is intended to simulate a question from an analyst not directly involved in planning and without munitions-specific expertise, then the answer is in fact much more dangerous,” Jenzen-Jones explained. “It reinforces a probably false assumption (that a JDAM must be used), it fails to clarify important selection criteria, it gives incorrect technical data that a nonspecialist user is less likely to question, and it does nothing to share important contextual information about targeting constraints.” Bryant agreed. “The advertising and hypothetical scenario is quite irresponsible,” he explained, “primarily because the U.S. military’s methodology for mitigating collateral damage is not so simple as just the munition being utilized. That is one factor of many.” Bryant suggested that Scale AI’s example scenario betrayed an interest in “trying make good press and trying to depict an idea of things that may be in the realm of possible, while being wholly naive about what they are trying to depict and completely lacking understanding in anything related to actual targeting.” Turning to an LLM for airstrike planning also means sidestepping the typical human-based process and the responsibility that entails. Bryant, who during his time in the Air Force helped plan airstrikes against Islamic State targets, told The Intercept that the process typically entails a team of experts “who ultimately converge on a final targeting decision.” Jessica Dorsey, a professor at Utrecht University School of Law and scholar of automated warfare methods, said consulting Defense Llama seems to entirely circumvent the ostensible legal obligations military planners are supposed to be held to. “The reductionist/simplistic and almost amateurish approach indicated by the example is quite dangerous,” she said. “Just deploying a GBU/JDAM does not mean there will be less civilian harm. It’s a 500 to 2,000-pound bomb after all.”

Commentary: From sinkholes to K-pop, there’s a growing threat of disinformation in MalaysiaA first-half header from Kim Min-jae guided Bayern Munich to a 1-0 home win over Paris Saint-Germain on Tuesday, damaging the French side’s hopes of progressing in the Champions League. The centre-back scored after an error from PSG goalkeeper Matvei Safonov, starting ahead of Gianluigi Donnarumma, who spilled the ball into Kim’s path. The South Korean’s effort was enough to decide the rematch of the 2020 Champions League final — won by Bayern by the same scoreline — and all but extinguishes PSG’s hopes of a top-eight finish and avoiding the playoff round. Ousmane Dembele picked up a second yellow for an unnecessary challenge with half an hour remaining, with Bayern successfully shutting up shop as a result. “It was an extremely intense game,” Leon Goretzka said to Amazon Prime. “You could see in the starting XI they were going to try and hold onto the ball and to test us with their pressing -– and we pushed to the end and it’s nice we could be rewarded.” With just three games remaining, even making the knockouts is not a given for the French champions, who are in 26th spot — two outside the playoff placings. PSG host Manchester City in January along with facing tricky away trips to Red Bull Salzburg and Stuttgart. Bayern’s top-eight hopes look rosier after the win, which extended their run of clean sheets to seven straight games in all competitions. Bayern now sit 11th and take on relative European minnows Shakhtar Donetsk, Feyenoord and Slovan Bratislava in their remaining games. – Enrique’s ‘choices’ – Both sides came into the game unbeaten and six points clear in their domestic leagues but in dire need of points in Europe. Bayern coach Vincent Kompany opted for the speed of Leroy Sane over the creativity of France winger Michael Olise up front. Related News UCL: Arsenal thrash Sporting 5-1 in Lisbon masterclass Chukwueze set for first UCL start Bundesliga: Kane's hat-trick sends Bayern eight points clear PSG boss Luis Enrique made five changes to his side but most notable was his decision to stick with goalkeeper Safonov, rather than Donnarumma, who had played all but one Champions League game this season. Luis Enrique defended his call before the game, telling reporters: “I make my choices based on what I see on the pitch and what’s best for the team.” The decision appeared to pay off early, with Safonov responsible for good saves from Jamal Musiala and Sane inside the opening 12 minutes. Kingsley Coman, the PSG academy product who scored the only goal in the 2020 final, almost broke the deadlock shortly afterwards, dribbling through five defenders and blasting just wide. After PSG had a few opportunities of their own, including Joao Neves’ long-range effort whistling past the goalpost on 33 minutes, the Russian goalkeeper made a mistake which led directly to the opener. Joshua Kimmich swung in a corner on the 38-minute mark which Safonov spilled. And Kim took advantage to power a header into the net for the first Champions League goal of his career. Bayern were happy to let the game come to them in the second half but Dembele’s second yellow — his first had come for dissent — took the steam out of PSG’s hopes of a comeback. AFP